• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Even if conventional war is acceptable in Catholic teaching, the possession and use of nuclear weapons could never be

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Even if conventional war is acceptable in Catholic teaching, the possession and use of nuclear weapons could never be" There are two obvious stances on this question. The first is that nuclear war with its potential for continuing destruction and damage to future generations can never be acceptable. The second is that which prevailed at the end of the second World War which was that it was acceptable in order to prevent further and prolonged mass destruction of both Japanese and European civilians and Army personnel in particular prisoners of war. To some degree I tend to agree that it was acceptable at that time because the prolonged effects were unknown and they were unpredictable at that time. ...read more.

Middle

However the criteria also require that 'the methods used in the war must be morally legitimate' and in view of the long term consequences that can be seen as doubtful; the criteria also require that 'it must not result in disproportionate evils to the enemy population to the home population or the international community'. Again, I wonder whether in the light of later events whether this criteria was fulfilled. However, some Catholics will agree on conventional wars but not nuclear wars, this is because nuclear wars are never to be justified. Nuclear war can cause innocent deaths in seconds after the explosion while conventional war can be controlled to not kill the innocent. ...read more.

Conclusion

Unilateral disarmament and militarily disarmament can be done to reduce threats of war from each nation to another reducing risk of using violence to solve problems, especially nuclear weapons, which can cause deaths as well as damage to nations. In conclusion, I think that if conventional war is acceptable or not acceptable nuclear war should never be allowed anyways, this is because it causes innocent deaths and too much damage to the victims, however, if nuclear war is a possibility of ending a conflict conventional war or any other solution should be considered and used first, it should be considered like a just war. Haakam Sandhu Poetry Re ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Christian views on a just war.

    I feel that it gets the point across in a much better way, as nobody is killed or hurt. So all these teaching are ways in which Christians can either use violence under controlled circumstances or different ways in using violence.

  2. Domestic violence.

    It is thought that frontal lobes especially the orbit omedial areas, are involved with the inhibition of inappropriate behaviors (Volavka 1995). Frontal lobe dysfunction has been found in criminal and violent subjects in a direct positive relationship with severity and frequency of violence.

  1. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    Having said that America and the United Kingdom are both members of the United Nations. It is, of course, illegal for one member of the United Nations to engage in combat with another, except in self-defence in response to an actual attack.

  2. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    Britain fought against Germany because they were being unfair. 3) The war was declared to prevent Hitler from entering other areas. 4) Britain had tried to previously appease Germany, but it had not worked. 5) Peace was re-established. Most Christians also believe that wars are permitted if they are holy wars.

  1. War in the modern world includes terrorism and the threat of nuclear war. ...

    Where there was hatred, there is now understanding, where there was a strife there is now peace. The teachings of the New Testament show that a Christian is different to unbelievers. They are a "light set up upon a hill" and an example worthy to emulate.

  2. For a Christian, Nuclear War Can Never Be Justified

    Another reason for them to justify the keeping and using these weapons, is that if they did not keep or use these weapons, and a group of fundamentalists from that country got hold of such weapons. This group could now have enough power to take over this country with no nuclear weapons.

  1. Victims of War

    to do hence you should help victims of war because you never; it could be you who is longing for help one day. Lastly, Christian use an incentive of getting to heaven in order to help motivate them to help people; Matthew 24:34-36 explains to

  2. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    as "advocacy for health to create the essential conditions for health... enabling all people to achieve their full health potential; and mediating between the different interests in society in pursuit of health". The three strategies of health promotion are supported by five key areas for action: * Building healthy public

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work