Evolutionism vs Creationism

        Creationists believe in God. What is God? God is an imaginary spiritual force. It’s highly unlikely that God is involved in the evolution. Bible states “So God created man in his own image”. (Genesis 1:27) Since many evidences are proving that humans evolved from Homo sapiens then what does God look like? Is he a Homo sapient? Many believe that God look like the humans today. Does God exist? Though no one can prove God does not exist but no one can prove the existence of God. If God did not interfere with the process and something else did, then it’s more ridiculous. Why did a stranger (or bunch or strangers) teach some savage animals and help them evolve to another form? If the stranger stayed on earth, he/she/it must have started an advanced civilization. Is it like Harry Potter’s magical world that is invisible to all “muggles” (humans) Even if the stranger(s) did not stay, he/she/it must have left something to prove its existence. However these evidences were never found. It bothers people because why do creationist add imaginary factors to an important illumination of human origin. Especially when evolutionist theory can explain the process without it. It’s not reasonable to believe in imaginary factors that were never proven.

        To most of people, Darwin’s theory is more reasonable and acceptable explanation. Darwin proved that every organism on this planet is going through a mild change over time. All living things developed from one simple life form, or from a few simple forms. Many different and complex life forms developed as a result of adoption to various environments. This theory can be used to explain many changes that occur on our planet. Scientists such as Leakey’s family have found evidences such as fossil and DNA samples to prove this theory. Leakey proved that our ancestors have high adaptability toward their environment. Ever since the stage of Homo erectus, our ancestors showed great ability in term of learning using things around them. It’s possible that they evolved by increasing amount of knowledge they have.

        How come some Homo erectus evolved to Homo sapiens while others did not? Darwin said: “Organisms change to fit into the surrounding environment.” By using the example of the long necked turtles, it’s possible to derive an explanation for why some Homo erectus changed to Homo sapiens while some did not. On an island where foods are all preserved in holes, there is a group of turtles living on it. Only turtles that have long neck can get the food and survive. As time passing by, every turtle on that island evolved and developed long neck due to the environment. If you view this change from the “big picture”, it’s possible to see that not all turtles evolved. Only those turtles who are/were on that island evolved to long necked turtles. This example can be used to explain why some Homo erectus evolved to Homo sapiens while some did not. The evolutionist theory is “during that period of time, in some areas had catastrophe which forced animals in that area to change or killed them. Therefore Homo erectus in those areas changed/evolved while others did not. What are those catastrophes? It’s still unknown.