• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine and consider the significance of modern teaching about a suffering God.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

CONOR MCGLOIN EXAMINE AND CONSIDER THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MODERN TEACHING ABOUT A SUFFERING GOD. (12 marks) Before tackling the question, it is important to have an understanding of what 'modern' teaching regarding a suffering God entails, and similarly what 'traditional' teaching entails. Up until the twentieth century, Christian theology in general stated that God was not capable of suffering. The twentieth century, however, saw a huge change in theologian's views regarding the nature of a suffering God - indeed, there was a complete reversal of previous opinions. For centuries, the orthodox view of God was that he could not suffer. There were (and still are) compelling reasons to hold this belief. The idea of God suffering has certain negative connotations. In order to suffer, there must be a cause for suffering, and if God can be affected, and hurt (for the idea of suffering certainly entails the idea of hurt) by some other being or event, surely he is not all powerful. The idea of suffering also raises the question of whether it means God changes, and how that fits with the Christian belief that God is perfect. In traditional Christian thinking, God is considered the perfect being, or entity. Now, if a perfect being changes in someway, surely this indicates a change away from perfection. ...read more.

Middle

This argument also raised questions concerning the empathetic nature of God. In order to be empathetic, God must share our suffering with us. This a major change in theological thinking, but there are problems regarding the nature of such a change. It could be said that the Church was simply changing its doctrine in order to accommodate a changing world. The Church must be careful not to change for the wrong reasons, as it would undermine its influence, and the respect it has. In the twentieth century, theologians also undertook the restudying of the Old Testament. New conclusions were drawn regarding the nature of God. He was seen, in the Old Testament, as a 'passionate' God, who understood the needs of his people and responded accordingly. He is seen to be angry at times, and is capable of punishing those who anger him. These are all seemingly emotional capabilities, and seem to indicate that God is able to relate to his people because he actually feels what they feel. This meant the Church had to reassess how they looked upon the nature of a suffering God, especially in relation to the study of the bible. Another significant problem raised during the twentieth century is that of religious plagiarism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The question of whether the Church was just finally succumbing to pressure from its followers has to be asked, though. This is, after all, a massive change in the belief system of the Church. It is also important to examine the argument concerning the nature of, and connection, between emotions. Christians often talk about God loving his people. The human perception of love is of an extremely strong emotion, and one that invariably involves suffering as well. If God is not capable of suffering with us, modern theologians said, surely God cannot be capable of experiencing love for us. Love will always involve suffering, and God must understand this emotion in order to love. The change in theologian thinking appears to have made God's love for us seem more certain than before. There is one more counter-argument to the modern teaching regarding God's impassibility. Christians believe God to be perfect, but if God is perfect, yet still suffers, is there any hope of a life free from suffering? Perhaps this new teaching could be considered as damning humans to a life of suffering, rather than giving them the opportunity to believe in a life free from pain. The change in the Church's teaching regarding a suffering God has undoubtedly seen a huge change in theology. It has shown itself to be a constantly changing and evolving thing, and has seemingly shown God to still be relevant in a modern world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Christianity - Ideas on suffering

    We do not question this. We seek to better ourselves and to focus our minds on the glory of God. Islam means submission ... believers are to accept the will of God in the blessings or in the suffering, and in equal measure knowing that each is the will of

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Freud also described the nature of society as being at conflict with our most basic needs and desires. Once such example was the ambivalence of the Oedipus complex. Were the conflicts such as the Oedipus complex unbridled in society, our society would not be able to operate.

  1. Is God really there? If he is, does he care? And if he does, ...

    Virtue is not given, it has to be achieved. St. Augustine (354-430) would completely disagree with Iranaeus' argument. He believed that God did not create evil but its occurrence just serves as a privation of good. He believed that all suffering was due to humanity who had abused God's gift of free will.

  2. Compare and contrast two of the following and evaluate their significance for understanding religious ...

    Not only this but symbols are seen to many as being neither adequate nor appropriate as a symbol is intended to point the way to understanding something.

  1. The God Question

    This theory is not as concrete as it seems for, if we devote our lives to a non existent God then we have wasted the only lifetime we have, and by denying our true beliefs we can decimate our psyche.

  2. What is meant by the problem of suffering?

    An alternative theodicy, written by John Hick, is based on the work of Irenaeus. It starts from a different perspective and fits better with the modern evolutionary theory. Humans were not originally living in perfect harmony with themselves, nature and God but were evolving from animal existence into a stage where they would be capable of being aware of God.

  1. Arguments about god.

    God was angry, but the clothes were symbols of his love for us. Nowadays, we recognize love as a feeling of affection towards someone. Whether they're a friend, relation, lover or even an animal. Behind love there is an entity telling us that love is good and we feel warm inside when we're around people we love.

  2. The Nature of God.

    Another example is the cosmological watch argument. If you found a watch lying on the floor you wouldn't think that it evolved because it is far too complicated to have evolved by chance. Then look at the human eye, this is by far more complicated than a watch or computer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work