• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine and consider the significance of modern teaching about a suffering God.

Extracts from this document...


CONOR MCGLOIN EXAMINE AND CONSIDER THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MODERN TEACHING ABOUT A SUFFERING GOD. (12 marks) Before tackling the question, it is important to have an understanding of what 'modern' teaching regarding a suffering God entails, and similarly what 'traditional' teaching entails. Up until the twentieth century, Christian theology in general stated that God was not capable of suffering. The twentieth century, however, saw a huge change in theologian's views regarding the nature of a suffering God - indeed, there was a complete reversal of previous opinions. For centuries, the orthodox view of God was that he could not suffer. There were (and still are) compelling reasons to hold this belief. The idea of God suffering has certain negative connotations. In order to suffer, there must be a cause for suffering, and if God can be affected, and hurt (for the idea of suffering certainly entails the idea of hurt) by some other being or event, surely he is not all powerful. The idea of suffering also raises the question of whether it means God changes, and how that fits with the Christian belief that God is perfect. In traditional Christian thinking, God is considered the perfect being, or entity. Now, if a perfect being changes in someway, surely this indicates a change away from perfection. ...read more.


This argument also raised questions concerning the empathetic nature of God. In order to be empathetic, God must share our suffering with us. This a major change in theological thinking, but there are problems regarding the nature of such a change. It could be said that the Church was simply changing its doctrine in order to accommodate a changing world. The Church must be careful not to change for the wrong reasons, as it would undermine its influence, and the respect it has. In the twentieth century, theologians also undertook the restudying of the Old Testament. New conclusions were drawn regarding the nature of God. He was seen, in the Old Testament, as a 'passionate' God, who understood the needs of his people and responded accordingly. He is seen to be angry at times, and is capable of punishing those who anger him. These are all seemingly emotional capabilities, and seem to indicate that God is able to relate to his people because he actually feels what they feel. This meant the Church had to reassess how they looked upon the nature of a suffering God, especially in relation to the study of the bible. Another significant problem raised during the twentieth century is that of religious plagiarism. ...read more.


The question of whether the Church was just finally succumbing to pressure from its followers has to be asked, though. This is, after all, a massive change in the belief system of the Church. It is also important to examine the argument concerning the nature of, and connection, between emotions. Christians often talk about God loving his people. The human perception of love is of an extremely strong emotion, and one that invariably involves suffering as well. If God is not capable of suffering with us, modern theologians said, surely God cannot be capable of experiencing love for us. Love will always involve suffering, and God must understand this emotion in order to love. The change in theologian thinking appears to have made God's love for us seem more certain than before. There is one more counter-argument to the modern teaching regarding God's impassibility. Christians believe God to be perfect, but if God is perfect, yet still suffers, is there any hope of a life free from suffering? Perhaps this new teaching could be considered as damning humans to a life of suffering, rather than giving them the opportunity to believe in a life free from pain. The change in the Church's teaching regarding a suffering God has undoubtedly seen a huge change in theology. It has shown itself to be a constantly changing and evolving thing, and has seemingly shown God to still be relevant in a modern world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Arguments about god.

    Many new words were created (e.g. ontology, omnipotent) to try to describe feelings or spiritual things. Verification/Falsification True Christians cannot easily be persuaded to change their viewpoints on their belief. John Hick - the road, is a parable, and like all parables has narrow limitations. It only makes one point, which is in Christian life, they

  2. Holocaust Theology

    Every time in Jewish History that innocent Jews have been prosecuted the same question arises, how could God let this happen? Thus, like Rubenstien, Fackenheim total rejects any theory which maintains that the Holocaust was a punishment meted out by God to the Jewish people because of their sins.

  1. Outline the teaching about the Kingdom of God in the Parable's of Mark's Gospel.

    And so the 'seed' grows. It grows by grace. The Parable of the Mustard Seed This parable is probably the simplest to understand from all the parables about the Kingdom of God. It shows that the mustard seed is the smallest seed of all but when it is planted, it grows taller than all other plants.

  2. Bertrand Russell and Atheism.

    The "designer" was natural selection. At best, the above arguments are inconclusive. The presence of evil and suffering in our world, however, is not in doubt - and weighs strongly against the existence of a beneficent God. Personally, I stand behind science.

  1. Is God really there? If he is, does he care? And if he does, ...

    you must never eat from the tree which gives the knowledge of good and evil. If you eat from that tree then you will die!" Genesis 2:16-18 As you can see, God lets man decide for himself whether he should obey him, and through giving him this decision, evil entered

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    However Davis has contested this idea because sometimes it is never illogical to aim for something outside of our reach because it helps us to better ourselves such as an A in a philosophy exam. Even if one accepts all of these premises of the moral argument, it could never be argued that this proves the existence of God.

  1. Outline the teaching about the kingdom of god in the parables of Marks gospel.

    This is when all the birds come and rest on the large branches in the shade and make nests. The story of the mustard seed is a parable because it is trying to get across a moral point that just because something is small or inadequate should not under-estimate it.

  2. Describe the teaching of the religion you are studying about the sanctity of life ...

    Scientists have shown that no new genetic material is added after fertilisation and this is one of the reasons why some Christians believe humans get a soul at fertilisation. There are many different opinions. On the other hand there are Christians who believe the Bible says nothing about abortions and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work