• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine different way in which good is used in Meta-Ethics.

Extracts from this document...


Examine different way in which good is used in Meta-Ethics. There are many different theories in Meta Ethics, which help us understand the meaning and use of 'good'. The theories in question are Ethical Non-naturalism, Ethical Naturalism and Ethical Non cognitivism. These theories are also known as Definism, intuitionism and emotivism. In Ethical Naturalism, or Definism, right and wrong, good and bad are all taken and understood as facts. Any ethical naturalist statements must be verifiable. An example of this is: 'Princess Diana died in 1997'. This statement is a factual statement, in that it did occur and that it can be verified. However another statement can also be considered as factual in the eyes of an ethical naturalist: 'Princess Diana was a kind and caring person.' An ethical naturalist would find that this statement is verifiable in much the same way as the first statement, 'princess Diana died in 1997'. This is because one can find out whether princess Diana was kind and caring by investigating her character and her attitude towards people or whether her actions had kind and caring consequences. ...read more.


He also talks about his open and closed question. This when a question answer itself. For example, ' Bryan has a sister, but is she female?' now a sister is a female sibling and therefore the question 'but is she female?' is already answered. Therefore this question is a closed question as it is answered already. An open question on the other hand does not answer the question, for example, 'I hate chocolate, but do you?' this is a question which does not have an answer within it and so it is open for more answers. Another great disadvantage with this theory is that because the statements are opinions and most of them are verified by opinions, it could be right/good one day and wrong/bad the next. As a result of his critiscim towards ethical naturalists, Moore comes up with his own moral theory, Ethical Non-naturalism. Moore states that we cannot describe what 'good' is and so how can we decide what id\s good and what is not. ...read more.


As the outcome of your actions may not be a very good one, this is not a 'good' thing to do. Moore's conclusion: 'If I am asked 'what is good?' my answer is good is good, and that is the end of the matter.' Good can also be determined by emotion. This is where Ethical non-cognitivism (emotivism) comes in. emotivism is when a moral judgement is expressed in a statement. For example, 'Hitler was an evil man' is someone's judgment saying I don't like him. In short, emotivism is someone's statement being simply based on emotions, and purely reflecting on the feelings of the person saying it. In addition an ethical statement gives us know knowledge, as it is a personal theory. The English philosopher, A.J Ayer states that their function is purely emotive. He also comes up with the 'Boo, Hurrah' theory, i.e., Mary thinks stealing is wrong, Tyler thinks stealing is right, in another words they are saying boo for stealing and hurrah for stealing. An emotive statement is an expression of approval or disapproval. Saori Yoshimoto 12J ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain the difference between Meta ethics and Normative ethics.

    The second is the deontological theory. This is the rightness of an action does not depend solely on its consequences since there may be certain features of the action itself which determine whether it is right or wrong. For instance: a fair and legal election, a new president is elected in a central African state.

  2. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    Emotivism is followed by many philosophers; despite their varying views on the subject it has meaning to them in different ways. However why do people adopt Emotivism? The Philosopher "Thomson" sees two reasons why people adopt Emotivism. The first is that they are lead to it by Moral right.

  1. Explain how Meta-Ethics differs from Normative Ethics.

    An action may be good because the action is generous, but Moore would argue that good isn't identical to generosity. When good is added to a sentence its affect is different from normal adjectives. 'A good red hat', the good adds a quality to the description.

  2. Explain what is meant by meta-ethics (33)b) "Words such as ...

    The naturalist F.H Bradley believed that a moral perspective was determined from self-realisation and from observing your own position in society. He did not agree with hedonism because he believed pleasure provided no final self-understanding. He concluded that the best approach was to pursue self-realisation within the community.

  1. Gap between reason and emotion

    where "the ethical goal of each of us should be the promotion of our own self-interests" (Woolman, Michael). Nevertheless it can at the same time be a way to justifying a moral decision. As shown from this case study, emotion aroused by the Japanese mother must be filled with desperation and loss.

  2. Utilitarianism is a good ethical theory. Why and why not?

    And how certain can you be that your perception of how happy it will make other people is not simply a personal opinion. It was indeed Hitler's personal opinion that the only solution to the "problem" of the Jews was to brutally murder them, to benefit the Aryan "master" race.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    This message is clear, so, if the Roman Catholic Church says it's wrong, and the Anglican Church says, most of the time, abortion is wrong, surely that makes abortion totally wrong? But the factions of the same religion have interpreted the same message differently, in quite a substantial way.

  2. "Medical research in the U.K. is being suffocated by excessive governance and ethical review".

    It remains to be seen that the members already in committees would accept these changes. Indeed it may result in a loss of the members that cannot spare longer hours or greater work loads or who have been serving out of public dedication and not for financial gain.4 The report

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work