• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...


(a) Examine the design argument for the existence of God. In this essay, I will be focusing on the different variations of the design argument, as expressed by Paley, as well as the version expressed by Hume, through Cleanthes, and its modern version in the form of the Anthropic Principle. I will describe the ideas of design 'qua regularity' and design 'qua order'; explaining what each means. I will also attempt to deconstruct the design argument and identify both its strengths and weaknesses, though this will form part (b) of my essay. I will then draw my own conclusion in response to the design argument. The design argument is also known as the teleological argument.1 This argument attempts to prove the existence of God, using analogy. The teleological argument is that of an a posteriori2 nature, as its basic form comes from the idea that we can deduce knowledge from what we know or have sense of, in this case, the existence of the universe. Even before the Greek philosophers, people have presumed that the natural order of the universe - and the way in which it works, i.e.the changing season, the intricacy of an eyeball, the complexity of the human brain - serves as evidence of a designer (who is often asserted to be God). The design argument has been expressed in two ways - 'design qua regularity', and 'design qua purpose'. Firstly, we will focus on design qua regularity. This aspect looks at design in relation to the order and regularity in the universe. Philosophers who support the argument would believe that it is evident that there is some sort of order in the universe - for example, the rotation of the planets - and that it cannot have occurred by random chance. This therefore suggests existence of a creator: God. St. Thomas Aquinas3 argues from design qua regularity in the fifth of his five ways, identifying that the way in which 'natural bodies' act in a regular fashion provides the ...read more.


inorganic world has provided the basic necessities required to sustain life * The progress of evolution towards the emergence of intelligent human life13 Basically, Tennant argues that because life is as it is - because we can see it for what it is and because we can survive in our universe as it is - there must have been a creator of this life and of the universe. 'The fact is, we are here, and here by the grace of some pretty felicitous arrangements. Our existence cannot of itself explain these arrangements. One could shrug the matter aside with the comment that we are certainly very lucky that the universe just happens to possess the necessary conditions for life is flourish, but that this is a meaningless quirk of fate. Again, it is a question of personal judgement.'14 Tennant also used the idea of aesthetic15 appreciation to further consolidate his argument. He stated that humans have the ability to appreciate the beauty of our world - and things such as art, music and literature - and this aesthetic appreciation is not a necessity. Tennant argues that it is not vital to regard things as beautiful and certainly not necessary for evolutionary survival, and yet, humans do - so there must have been a 'divine creator' of the universe, who determined that humans would have specific attributes in addiction to those required for basic survival. Although Tennant regarded his argument as valid, it was not particularly appreciated by people at that time. It was the developments in cosmology, theoretical physics and pure mathematics, which urged philosophers - such as Richard Swinburne - to re-examine it. Swinburne argues, using probability16, that it is much more likely for the universe to have been created through design as opposed to having been created by random chance. Swinburne again reiterated that the complexity and the order of the universe support the theory that there must have been some form of design: and he concludes that this design's simplest explanation is that of God. ...read more.


This may be argued against by the fact that the chances of the universe forming as it has done were infinitesimal; however, do we actually have the knowledge to predict that if the slightest thing had changed, the whole universe would be entirely different? Or that perhaps human life wouldn't have evolved at all? If there was a God who created the world for us to appreciate things such as aesthetics, what were his18 motives? What did he want of humans? What is the meaning of life? The truth is, the Anthropic Principle causes us to ask more questions: what sort of God created humankind? And there is no logical explanation as to why there was a single, personal, transcendent God with qualities such as being omnipotent, omniscient etc. To make that much of a presumption without justification cannot be valid - where is any evidence for such a being? In conclusion, I think both the Design Argument and the Anthropic Principle - although based upon probability rather than reality or evidence - can be understood and accepted by most philosophers and humans: the universe really is complex, and how is it so that our universe may have just fallen into place in such a precise way? It seems unlikely; and the universe now - in its current form - certainly points to the idea of a designer. However, whether this designer was/is God is another argument and personally I find the way in which Paley, for example, manages to jump from the idea of a designer to the idea of God rather illogical. How can there be a Theistic God when it is evident that we have suffering in the world? ... 'This world, for all he knows, is very faulty and imperfect compared to a superior standard; and was only the first rude essay of some infant deity who afterwards abandoned it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Discuss the teleological argument for the existence of God. How viable is this argument?

    things in themselves as our understanding imposes such categories as unity and plurality, cause and effect. Working with this view, some thinkers have suggested that the argument from design fails because, order is 'mind imposed' rather than 'God imposed'." (Davies, 1993)

  2. Good and Evil

    who do evil to them, no one-not even Jesus has the moral right to forgive evil done to others. But other Christians do have a more sophisticated defence for this argument. They argue that victims should be encouraged to forgive all evil done to them because it is psychologically healthy to do so.

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    end, so this proves the existence of a designer, or divine being. He says that things do what they do by design, not luck. HE used the analogy of the archer and the arrow, to explain that anything lacking knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless directed by an intelligent

  2. Assess Nietzsche's critique of religion.

    Nietzsche doesn't like this - why do people follow the saint? Philosophy has been anti-Christian because it has made us question the soul. Even Christian philosophers undermine Christianity eg. Descartes. Before people believed in souls like they believed in grammar.

  1. "If God made the world, then he must be absent without leave!" Write an ...

    Similarly, If there was not enough energy, even then the Earth would not exist, because the speed of the force would be too less. Therefore, exactly the accurate amount of energy is needed. In the same way, if the universe were one hundred miles closer to the sun, or even

  2. Belief has been described as TOK essay

    The question is how does natural science defines belief? When we say we belief, in natural science it means that we are certain of things that can indirectly or directly be seen , proven and duplicable. For example, when Sir Isaac Newton claims that the world has a gravitational force,

  1. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    or the other: "The watch may have been made with the aid of some blind screwdrivers (or even a blind watchmaking machine), but they were guided by a watchmaker with some very clear sight". (Is there a God?, p.63) It seems unfair for Dawkins to discount Paley as 'gloriously wrong'.

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    field you would assume that it had always been there, but if you were to find a watch in a field you would assume that it had been designed and put there for a reason because of its complexity. This is similar to the universe in that it must have been created by God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work