• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the key features of the cosmological argument.

Extracts from this document...


Examine the key features of the cosmological argument. The cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument. It explores the existence of the universe as proof of God. The claim is that the universe cannot account for its own existence and so the argument seeks causes that have their solution in the existence of God. It is important to discuss three of Thomas Aquinas' five ways written in his summa theologica, as they are key features of the argument. The Kalam theory will also be mentioned, as it is a key feature and a strength; this theory was derived from the Muslim school of theology. William Craig's modern version argues that the universe had a first cause, and that the first cause was a personal creator - God. Thomas Aquinas' understanding of creation was based on the Genesis account. Which basically read - god created 'ex nihilo' - out of nothing. Aquinas wrote in his 'summa theologica', a book containing over 4000 pages, his arguments for the existence of God. However their compact form has made them popular, and they have become known as 'five ways'. All these points are a posteriori as they are all based on observation and experience of the universe. The first way is 'the unmoved mover', St Thomas Aquinas studying the works of Greek philosopher, Aristotle, concluded from common observation that an object that is in motion, for example planets or a rolling stone is put into motion by some other object or force. ...read more.


A contingent being is an object that cannot exist without a necessary being causing its existence. Aquinas believed that the existence of contingent beings would ultimately necessitate a being, which must exist for all the contingent beings to exist. In other words, contingent beings are caused; not every being can be contingent. So there must exist a being, which is necessary to cause contingent beings, therefore this infers that the necessary being is God. Aquinas believes this because if all beings were contingent, then at one time nothing would have existed. This is because there would have been a time prior to all things coming into existence, but if that is the case then nothing would have been able to exist because everything contingent would have had to have a prior cause. Thus all beings cannot be contingent. The main reasoning for Thomas Aquinas' five ways being a strength to the cosmological argument is that they are a posteriori. They are based on experience and observation of the universe, because of this they seem to make perfect sense to us, as our surroundings and the universe are the only things we really understand and can relate to. The Kalam argument has its roots in medieval Arabic philosophy and theology. The Arabic word means 'natural theology' or 'philosophical theism'. The Kalam arguments try to demonstrate that the existence of an actual infinite is impossible and that even if it were possible, the universe itself is not actually infinite and hence, must have a beginning. ...read more.


Concerning the limitation of the physical realm to provide answers to such questions, Leibniz writes: ' you will never find in those states a full reason why there should be any world rather than none.... it is evident that the reason must be sought elsewhere'. So if the answer as to why this present universe exists cannot be found in the material realm, then it must according to Leibniz, lie elsewhere and it must be something different from that which is found in the world. Now the fact that there is something rather than nothing means that things have a tendency towards existence. If things have a tendency towards existence then ' that series of things will be forthcoming, which in actual fact affords the greatest quantity of reality'. The cosmological argument offers an explanation of why anything exists and why it has this type of order, it seems that it is a strong argument, as it has universal appeal because it is based on that which we all experience - the world. The cosmological argument bases itself on experience of the world and therefore can be related to religious theories and is compatible with scientific ones, thus making it appeal to an even wider audience, also it is up for negotiation and many different versions of theories have been made up inside this one argument inferring it has many strengths. However the cosmological argument does have many weaknesses stated by people like David Hume and A. Kenny. Ellen Hooper 12 DB ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    for beginners as a writing of all of the main theological teachings of that time. It is considered to be the best work of Roman Catholic theology, and is studied at many universities and colleges. Accordingly in this book he proposed '5 ways' to prove the existence of a necessary God.

  2. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    If God exists but does not have a cause of his existence then if God is thought to have a cause for existence that this is false, in which case the cosmological argument is unsound. If God is thought to have a cuase than this is false, i.e.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    suggest that there is a divine-law giver who wrote all of these rules; "It is impossible to think of a command without a commander." Owen's point was that since rules do not write themselves, they must either be brute facts requiring no explanation or put there by God.

  2. Examine the key features of the Cosmological for the existence of God. For what ...

    He developed his 'Five Ways' and the first three ways were used to prove the existence of God, they were Motion, Causation and Contingency. The first way is based on motion. Whatever is moved must be moved by another, which itself was moved.

  1. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    He also noted that it is possible that the experiences that he recorded could have been induced through the influence of drugs or alcohol. Referring back to the question, is religious experience all in the mind of the believer, William James argues that religious experiences cannot simply be discounted - no more then everyday ones can be.

  2. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    He argues that there are not many similarities with the world and a machine. He then argued it does not always necessarily mean similar effects, similar causes. He questioned if this was a sound idea and maybe we could get a different cause from similar effects.

  1. Bereshit, the first word in Genesis translates to "in a beginning"

    Indeed, the earth of the Yahwist was "an arid, plantless, uninhabited wilderness"21 which is remarkably similar to the parched alluvial plains of Mesopotamia. Another example of these influences is God's artisanship. He forms "the man from the dust of the ground" (2:7)

  2. Examine the key features of the cosmological argument for the existence of God St ...

    They also relied on something else for their own existence; an example of this is man relying on reproduction to continue the human race. However if all beings were contingent then there would have been a time when nothing existed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work