• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the major features of the ontological argument for the existence of God. (b) To what extent do the strengths of this argument overcome its weaknesses?

Extracts from this document...


2. (a) Examine the major features of the ontological argument for the existence of God. (b) To what extent do the strengths of this argument overcome its weaknesses? The ontological argument for the existence of God was originally set out in eleventh century by St. Anselm in his Proslogian. Anselm was a Benedictine monk, Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the great medieval theologians. It has received a lot of both support and criticism from leaning philosophers. The argument is appeals to those who already believe in the existence of God than to an atheist. The argument is entirely a priori; it seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of that concept alone, and show existence as an attribute/characteristic of God, in the same way omnipotence and benevolence are considered to be. Anselm presented his argument in two stages, with the main idea behind them being that epistemology is ontology, so that if we can conceive of X then X must exist. Anslem defined God as 'a being than which nothing greater can be conceived', and thus cannot just exist merely in peoples thoughts. He must exist separate from our thought, in reality. To explain this he used the analogy of the painter, " For when a painter thinks ahead to what he will paint, he has that picture in his thought, but he does not yet think it exists, because he has not done it yet. ...read more.


In the 20th Century there have been two main philosophers who have worked noteably on the Ontological Argument, Norman Malcolm and Alvin Plantinga. Malcolm's theory is based on the premise that the classical Christian theist view of God is right. His work focuses on the idea of God having necessary existence. His theory was if God is 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived'. He cannot be brought into existence or happen to come into existence, because this would lead to a greater being than God, but this being would then be God as it can be conceived of as the greatest being. Therefore God is either necessary or impossible but along with Anselm's ideas this means God has to exists, with belief or not. Malcolm believes that unless God's necessary existence presents us with a logical contradiction, we have to accept it. Alvin Plantinga's notion of God's existence is through his form of the argument through the idea of possible worlds. This is the notion of the world as it is today is just a chance event and that our presence here is not necessary but was possible, if it were impossible we would not be here. A possible world is the complete way something can be. ...read more.


Immanuel Kant opposed the version of the argument put forward by Rene Descartes. He objected to the claim the denying God's existence was the same as deny triangles angles add up to 180 degrees, which is a contradiction. He states that if one dismisses the idea of the angles adding up and that of triangle its self, there is no contradiction left. This appears to deal with Descartes but Kant has a second point to defeat Anselm, 'existence is not a predicate', he says that just because someone says X exists it does not tell you anything about X. Thus the statement 'X exists' is telling us a property about X, then 'X does not exist' denies that it has this property, but how can God lack this if it does not lack anything? Thomas Aquians' compliant about the Ontological argument is it does not base the statement 'God exists' on a secure basis. It does not refer to any a posteriori criteria because it is based entirely on a logical argument. This is not going to convince an atheist because they have to start with the assumption the God does exist. 1 Pasted from www.faithnet.org.uk/kes 2 Intrinsic maximum - can not be bettered Drew Dyson 13SW: Religious Studies ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    This means that the ones with the best characteristics would breed together, and the best genes from each one would be combined to form an even better being. "...man should be able to improve the fleetness of his greyhounds through careful and methodical selection."

  2. Present the strengths and weaknesses of Augustine's and Ireneaus' theodicy

    After looking at Augustine's theodicy for evil and suffering I have come to a conclusion that evil could not have created itself from nothing, it has created itself from what God has created. It might be logical to believe that evil had come from Adam and Eve as they were the first people on earth, but God created those humans.

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    to explain this 'Why is there something rather then nothing' so for a sufficient reason for the worlds existence, there must be a being that can create existence, this must be God Leibniz's argument is sometimes known as the argument from 'sufficient reason' This is similar to Aquinas's third cause.

  2. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    greater being (one just like God that you said did not exist, except this one would exist). Existence must be one of God's attributes because to remove it, you would still be able to fathom a greater God (one which does exist).

  1. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    You Must Refer To Christianity in Your Answer. For this section of the essay I will first cover the several different points of views that are widely upheld by others, and then cover my own belief. The three beliefs given by others are that philosophers have tried to prove or disprove the existence of God either by existence of the world, experience of the world or reason.

  2. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Existence isn't a great-making property because it is not a property at all; it is rather a metaphysically necessary condition for the instantiation of any properties. So in summary, Kant argued that existence was not a predicate and that necessary existence does not work either.

  1. "The Design Argument fails because of its weaknesses" Examine and comment on this claim

    You cannot link a watch towards something, which is a far more superior, and multitasking being. Like many of these assumptions they are lacking concrete evidence to prove it, it is just a theory and therefore weakens the argument towards the existence of a creator.

  2. Does God Exist?

    which nothing can be concieved', Anslem is suggested that if you concieve something greater in the mind there is a possibility that it exists in reality, would make it's existence greater for example in terms of being more powerful and freer etc in comparison to just being a figment of someones imagination.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work