• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain and discuss one critique of the link between religion and morality

Extracts from this document...


Explain and discuss one critique of the link between religion and morality One critique of the link between religion and morality comes from Professor Chung, who believed he was a moral atheist and that you do not have to be religious to be moral, and that religion does not automatically mean that you possess moral authority. His position argues that religion in fact corrupts a person's morality and makes them less moral. Professor Chung first points out that although in our society religious rules and societies morals are closely interlinked it does not mean that religious people are qualified to decide the correct moral action one should take in a certain situation. He believes that although religious leaders regard themselves as experts they are in reality limited and not moral at all as they are being lead not by what the believe to be morally right but by a set of rules the believe they must follow. Most world religions have deontological morality systems which they must follow for example the Ten Commandments which Christians and Jews obey. These are a set of rules that they are told they should obey throughout their lives in order to live a morally good life. Therefore in situations Christians and Jews should turn to these commandments and the other commandments in the form of teachings in their holy book to decide moral dilemmas. ...read more.


Another example is the Serbian Orthodox who were lead by their religious moral teachings to murder Muslim Bosnians or the violence in Northern Ireland of Christians killing people from a different denominations of Christianity. Surely it would be generally agreed upon that these acts of murder are all morally wrong, yet it was religion that motivated them, therefore the critique is that religious morality can promote immoral acts, and therefore should not be used as a basis for morality, and the link is again weakened. It could be argued that these are all exceptions of misinterpretations of the teachings although I personally do not accept this as an excuse because it was religion that motivated the immoral acts and therefore it should take part of the blame for them. Further criticism from Professor Chung is that in every day life the vast majority of decisions made are very straight forward and based on common sense and not religious moral systems. This again weakens the link as it shows that religion does not come into the vast majority of decisions made, even by religious people. A religious believer could defend this saying it is more practical and when it comes to big important moral decisions such as abortion or murder it is religion that people turn to for their moral guidance. ...read more.


This furthermore weakens this link as it shows that morality is not from birth linked to religion. Professor Chung's final part of his attack on the link between morality and religion is based on the religious idea of God. If God is omnipotent which most religions believe he is then he has the power to stop a person committing immoral acts, and if he does not then he is responsible for that person's actions due to aiding and abetting the person through divine negligence. This would result in a person losing their moral responsibility and this is exactly the opposite of what religion believes, so it is self contradicting and again the link is weakened. In conclusion it is clear that Professor Chung has a strong argument against the link between religion and morality. He points out on more than one occasion that religious moral codes are not only impractical and often lead to immoral acts, but are self contradicting and often ignored by religious believers. Moreover he also points out that a person does not have to be religious to be moral, and therefore how can religion shape morality if some people are not religious but still moral. This clearly shows that morality comes from human nature and not religion, and therefore his argument is very effective, and in my opinion disproves the link of morality and religion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    Bertrand Russell argues this point: 'I say quite deliberately that the Christian religion, as organized in its churches, has been and still is the principle enemy of moral progress in the world.' Ethics and religion can be linked by three possibilities.

  2. Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality.

    Another weakness in relativism is that it appears that morals are created by man to suit different ways of life. This could be by tradition or adapting to circumstances. Jeremy Bentham wrote in 1789 'All human actions are motivated by the desire to obtain pleasure and avoid pain'.

  1. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    On the other hand, choosing to spend that money on unnecessary clothes and goods, whilst being aware of the Bengali child's situation, seems immoral. In the way we live our everyday lives, we are choosing the latter, and are thus seriously guilty of moral wrongdoing, according to Singer.

  2. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    That is to say that our genes are 'selfish', which at the genetic level is good, while altruism is bad would be evolutionarily hazardous. An altruistic gene would not survive whereas a selfish gene would endow its possessor with the qualities needed to survive.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    Utilitarianism does not find it morally necessary to uphold the sanctity of life. This creates a dilemma in which it could be ok to sacrifice human life in order to pleasure other humans. This is clearly not practical, so what if I turn to another theory, what about Situation ethics.

  2. Explain how a Hindu marriage service might guide a couple in their married life?

    This is often seen as a good way of resolving the solution. Explain how a Hindu might respond to someone who was thinking about euthanasia Most Hindus believe that all of life is sacred; they believe that everything should be done to make ill people more comfortable, but this should not involve the taking of a life.

  1. Describe the teachings of the religion which you are studying about war and pacifism.

    The holy war was called on by Pope Urban II and was very violent, this makes people ask questions about there religion because both of the religions promote peace yet are fighting a violent war. Some Christians totally disagree with violence however because they are pacifists and this means you

  2. Free essay

    Describe the Christian teachings about the way in which believers should treat people who ...

    us to be a bigger person and treat everyone as an equal and as some of the quotes I have mentioned say to help them as much as we possibly can this is a part of a Christian believers life as they should stick to this as a day to day ritual.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work