• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Aristotle's idea of the four causes.

Extracts from this document...


Explain Aristotle's idea of the four causes. Aristotle explained that things could be seen in four different ways. He named these the four causes. These were the material, formal, efficient and the final cause. "Aition" is the nearest translation for the word cause, which means a responsible explanatory factor. The material cause, this answers the question what is it made of? One example could be a clay pot, this is made from clay. But Aristotle argued that the material is not enough on it's own to make it what it is. ...read more.


The efficient cause is the thing that happens to bring about certain results. For instance in my example of a clay pot it would be the person who gas made the clay pot, the act of the person forming the shape of their clay pot. This is the cause that brings the substance of the object into a particular form. In the efficient cause "potentiality" is turned into "actuality" the person sees the potentiality of the clay and actualises it by making it into a clay pot. The efficient cause connects the material cause to the formal cause. ...read more.


The question to ask when discussing the final cause is, what is it for? Aristotle also said that the final cause for everything in the universe is the "prime mover" or the "first cause". Aristotle argued that man's ultimate purpose is to love and desire God, the prime mover. The prime mover was explained as being unmoved and separate; he was eternal and a passive being. "There must be a mover which moves them without being moved eternal and a substance and actual." For this reason Aristotle thought God to be a Deistic God. Aristotle came to the conclusion that everything in the universe was attracted to the prime mover. Kirsty Densham 12.5 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Aristotle believed that everything has a cause. He saw four different explanations for ...

    The prime Mover is eternal and infinite. In this way, it is possible to think of the reason of a person living on after their death, but not in any recognisably individual form. But Aristotle argued that there was no evidence for Plato's belief in the World of the Idea.

  2. Compare Aristotle's idea of the Prime Mover to the Judaeo Christian idea of God ...

    Everything wants to imitate God's perfection, and, therefore, everything is drawn to him. Corresponding to this idea, the Prime Unmoved Mover is immune to the process of change itself, and so must be a supreme object of desire as anything eternal or immutable appears perfect.

  1. Explain what Aristotle meant by the 'final cause'.

    He believed that a universe as a whole has a purpose too. However there are many people who would disagree with that statement. Aristotle criticizes Plato for his belief in the world of Forms when he has no sturdy evidence of their existence.

  2. Explain what Aristotle meant by the 'final cause'.

    People would have no morals and not have to live there life for any reason. If there is no purpose, God would be insignificant. Aristotle doesn't make it clear if purpose applies generally to humans or objects or to each individual.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work