• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Explain how Act and Rule Utilitarianism differ.'

Extracts from this document...


'Explain how Act and Rule Utilitarianism differ.'(33) Utilitarian morals focus much more on actions rather than individuals. The primary concerns of these moral theories are what the right moral thing to be done is, leaving the moral individuals as simply those people that perform that moral action. Therefore any Utilitarian principle has to be based on the principle of utility which states that doing a good action or the right thing is morally right when it maximises the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Utilitarians usually agree that utility in terms of good is measured in pleasure and in terms of evil is measured in pain. Utilitarians believe that the right action is the one that has the best results for the most individuals; they use this principle to determine what the correct moral thing to do in circumstances. Utilitarianism seeks to find a way in which you can promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number. The earliest form that we see of this is Act Utilitarianism, which is when what is right is concluded by fulfilling a particular set of actions, this was put forward by Jeremy Bentham but was later challenged by John Stuart-Mill with Rule Utilitarianism. ...read more.


For Bentham pleasures and pain were numbers which were assigned to certain criteria, the same as the benefits criteria (as above). The person then faced with the particular moral issue was then meant to assign these criteria to the situation and determine which action had the greatest balance of pleasure over evil. Bentham clearly believed that, this made morality a science, and since Bentham's method was primarily focused on the amount of pleasure and pain that was measured it is known as Quantitative Utilitarianism. Bentham seems to imply that both pleasure and pain are equal in value, since he believes that they thrown into an equation, much like mathematics and come out with the correct moral answer. A disagreement among many Utilitarians is whether the action each is so unique that it can be judged independently from all the other actions or whether the rules of moral behaviour can be applied. This theory that claims that each action is unique is Act Utilitarianism. The circumstances that surround each action are different from any other action, therefore for every action that is made a different set of consequences must be calculated. ...read more.


Mill who believed in Rule Utilitarianism said that over time, the general rules or principles of moral behaviour can be developed. So that there will be types of actions that over long periods of time will maximise utility. For example, telling the truth for long periods of time will maximise the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Rule Utilitarians believe that we can predict which actions will cause the greatest happiness for the greatest number, therefore making them our general moral rules. This means that if a person is performing an action then they do not have to calculate the consequences of this action, they just have to follow a set of principle rules. Thus, meaning that the actions of Rule Utilitarians will be much less time consuming and easier. Although they save time, they do however have to establish which actions will be the one that will maximise the greatest utility. There are both Act and Rule Utilitarians, even though these two versions of utilitarianism show different ways in which you should calculate moral behaviour, neither version have provided enough proof to reject the alternative reproach. Both Act and Rule Utilitarianism make perfect sense in how you should act in moral situations but neither shows any flaws in either of the approaches. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    The morality that Ross circumscribes is one that is noble and even possible. William Frankena also brings about an interesting point, among others, but one stands out. That it seems right that we promote the most good that we can while trying to prevent as much evil as possible.

  2. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    However there are claims that the contributors to virtue theory have certain prejudices. For example Aristotle was said to have been sexist and ageist. Therefore some of his views may have stemmed from this prejudice, which would essentially make some of his views unacceptable in today's society.

  1. What are the main features of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? Examine and consider ...

    When making an ethical decision, Bentham felt it obligatory to weigh up the possible outcomes of one's actions in terms of the duration, likelihood, proximity, productivity and the number of people that will be affected by it. The Hedonic Calculus allows contemplation over an action dependent on its consequences.

  2. Utilitarianism is a contrast to classic approaches to ethics. One of the main features ...

    One of the problems with the Hedonic Calculus was that it judged the quantity of happiness i.e. the number of people but not the quality of the happiness therefore problems arise in assessing it's value. Different pleasures bring different amounts of happiness to different people but in Bentham�s theory all pleasures are equal.

  1. If an action is done as a result of affection, rather than as a ...

    Once under an obligation, we ought to attempt to fulfil it. If no obligation exists, then it becomes a matter of inclination or of taste, which we should do.

  2. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    Otherwise the action is wrong. (Business Ethics 1999) To put this more simply, it is a moral principle that when a course of action produces greatest balance of benefits over harms for everybody that are affected. Then this action is morally right, otherwise, it is wrong.

  1. Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

    For Bentham an action is good or bad depending on the amount of pleasure shared by a number of people. He was clearly only concerned with quantity of pleasure. Bentham believed that all types of pleasure were equal; therefore quality was not an issue.

  2. Explain the main differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism.

    As a result, although act utilitarianism takes into account individual situations, it has the ability to justify virtually any action, whereas rule utilitarianism follows the principle that by applying a certain rule (such as do not lie) to a specific situation, the greatest happiness for the community is upheld, and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work