• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making? Virtues are the essence of the human spirit and the content of our character. Virtue theory enhances this. Virtue theory focuses on the importance of the person, and the development of that person's character, rather than the actions of the individual and the consequences of his or her actions. Becoming virtuous requires practice. With enough practice the individual will begin to cultivate the virtues simply through habit, and as such become virtuous, which then benefits society. Aristotle and Macintyre both apply virtue theory to moral decision making. Both philosophers have different views of virtue ethics; however their arguments are both formed around the basic concepts of virtue theory. Virtue theory is linked to moral decision making by Aristotle and Macintyre. Virtues are human qualities and express what type of character we have, and moral decision making can affect the character that we are developing, whether we do the right or wrong thing is various situations. Aristotle's views on virtue theory are all led back to the highest good; Eudaimonia. To understand its role in virtue ethics we look to Aristotle's function argument. Aristotle recognizes that actions are not pointless because they have an aim. Every action aims at some good. Furthermore, some things are done for their own sake and some for the sake of others. Aristotle then observes that when an object has a function the good of the object is when it performs its function well. For example, the knife has a function, to cut, and it performs its function well when it cuts well. ...read more.

Middle

He uses Homeric, Athenian and Medieval virtues to express and demonstrates ethical reasoning. He concludes that these differences are attributable to different practices that generate different conceptions of the virtues. Each account of virtue requires a prior account of social and moral features in order to be understood. Thus, for example, in order to understand Homeric virtue you need to look at its social role in Greek society. The ways in which we act will influence the way other act, mainly our friends. In return the way we act allows others to judge our characters. Similarly to Aristotle, Macintyre believes the virtues which make up our character, should be at the midpoint between vice and deficiency. These points will affect the moral decisions made by an individual, as it allows them to understand that reason is required, and situations must be understood fully before coming to consequential rash decisions.. This view equally maintained by Aristotle. Macintyre used an analogy about series of natural disasters that turn the public against the natural sciences. Much information about the sciences is lost and science only survives by children learning small pieces of science. As such Macintyre says that this is like the state of morality. Virtues, then, are exercised within practices that are coherent. The virtues enable us to achieve these goods. There is an end (or telos) that transcends all practices and it constitutes the good of a whole human life. That end is the virtue of integrity or constancy. These two writers have both, in their own way, argued for a radical change in the way we think about morality and they way make moral decisions. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in another country abortion may be banned due to the religion that they follow. The dilemma comes around because it is hard to say which country has the correct morals, and is abortion right or wrong? A major weakness of the virtue theory is that because it is not rule based, it is in many people's opinions too flexible. There is no real clear correct solution when it comes to making decisions and this makes it hard when it comes to decision making, because for specific moral dilemmas there is not an absolute right action. Therefore the norms of society can become the desires of the society. Secondly, you can't know if an individual is truly virtuous or not. For example, if an elderly person collapsed on the pavement, and an individual ran out to help the elderly person get back up, how do you know what that individuals motive was when helping the elderly person. It may have truly been to help, as that individual may be truly virtuous. However, for certain people their motive would be so that they look good, and appear virtuous, and doing acts to appear virtuous defines virtue ethics. In conclusion virtue theory is useful in some instances with decision making, however not useful in other instances. It is a very unclear theory which needs clear understanding before being used to make decisions. Despite being different to other ethical theories, and focusing solely on the character, there is no way to resolve conflicts within virtue theory, and there is no way to determine right actions. Therefore in terms of decision making is has limited utility. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain Virtue ethics. Virtue ethics is of little practical use to someone with a ...

    Virtue ethics cannot be separated from principles and rules as a different system. We only know honesty is a virtue because we see the principle that says we have a duty to tell the truth. Without rules and principle we cannot recognize whether to admire a characteristic as a virtue.

  2. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    However, it could be contended that atheists with no belief in a particular God still live a moral life. It could be said that religion is one of the main causes for war and the injustices that take place in the world.

  1. Explain how Macintyre's or Aristotle's account of a life lived in accordance with virtues ...

    He says that when our soul succeeds in controlling our desires, we engage our moral virtues. When our soul concentrates on intellectual matters, we engage our intellectual virtues. He tells us, every action and feeling must be done in the right amount.

  2. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    It shows to me that total spending on education in these countries had increased, therefore as a result of higher educated people, therefore any debt being paid of twice as quickly as before. The story is similar with spending on health, which has risen by 70 per cent than what

  1. Explain how a Hindu marriage service might guide a couple in their married life?

    Men and women are believed to have a religious duty to marry and have children, and although some people do remain single, they are very much in the minority.

  2. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    Perhaps the biggest problem with Bentham's theory is that it neglects the views and concerns of the minority. Hence it can be used to justify any action as long as it is producing the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.

  1. Aristotle - Virtue Ethics Essay

    where actions are often measured extrinsically rather than seeing the intrinsic value of the action itself. Aristotelian virtue ethics are not at all timeless, it would be considered to an individual making a moral choice in today's society far too elitist.

  2. Explain Virtue ethics - its strengths and weaknesses?

    of good character any better than anyone else at making the right choices. Also another problem of virtue- based ethical systems is the question of what sort of character is a person and what should they have. Many virtue theorists and believers would answer to this question that the answer would be self evident.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work