• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sarah Andrews Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality. The word moral [ from the latin word 'mores' meaning customs] is defined in the English dictionary as being 'concerned with right and wrong conduct' and the definition of morality is 'moral principles or rules; goodness or rightness'. The word ethics [ from the greek word 'ethos' ] is defined as meaning 'principles or standards of human conduct - sometimes called morals'. These definitions are what most people would expect but most people do not realise that there are different types of moralism and tend to have their own ideas as to what is morally right. Moral regulation of any kind has been necessary to a societies' well being throughout history. There are two main types of morality theories. Absolute morality is when universal standards of right or wrong apply to all people at all times irrespective of their culture or beliefs. Relative morality is based on the theory that truth and rightness is different for different people or cultures. Some schools of thought believe that morals were formalized into standards of conduct being developed after religious or cultural taboos were violated or when a certain behaviour became a habit. ...read more.

Middle

to promote tolerance of others.Christians, for instance, believe that the Ten Commandments were issued by God [their creator] to remind humankind of their obligations to life and others. Other religions have similar codes on which their faith is based.Unless there is universal belief in one true God there will always be differing opinions of what is right or wrong.Absolutists believe their way is right and could be accused of arrogance. This is illustrated by the work of missionaries that travel to remote cultures to teach them their values. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of moral relativism. Relative morality has had in the past many followers. Supporters of various forms of socialism and non religious groups usually support relativism in some form.An example of this is Marxism, a movement created by a German philosopher called Karl Marx. He argued that morality exists merely to give the ruling classes power. Power to monopolise religion, education. law and morality, allowing them to dictate values to others.Relativists do not believe that any one person should dictate how others conduct their lives. If taken to the extreme this could lead to individuals deciding what is morally right or wrong for themselves. ...read more.

Conclusion

But most social groups are ruled by the few who want the rest to follow their values. In the past this created imbalance in societies, as it does today, giving power to some. When pagen cultures decayed many turned to christianity because it seemed to give moral citizenship to all, even lowly people and slaves. People thought this would rebalance society. Relativism does have some strengths. It teaches tolerance of others who may hold different views, making people examine why different cultures behave as they do and encouraging compromise so that different people of different moral standards can co-exist.Relative morality appears to be more compatible with modern life. Whoever created mankind gave us the intelligence to evolve and adapt which means that moral values will inevitably change.Absolutists would argue that universal morality should exist whatever other changes take place but as long as the common denominator morals remain in place it is impossible to expect individual values to stay the same. Relativism seems to put the responsibility of good moral behaviour with the individual. Whilst we cannot have people behaving exactly how they would like without some consideration for others I think that to make individuals responsible for their own actions is a good moral starting place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    Ethics and religion can be linked by three possibilities. The first is autonomy. Autonomy is a system that holds that morality is autonomous if it is independent of religion. Its principles are justified on the basis of reason alone. It is not necessarily opposed to religion, and can be held by someone with religious beliefs.

  2. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    Singer's argument raises an interesting point about the difference in definition between duty and charity; nowadays charity is not generally considered a duty, whereas Singer is saying that it should be. Not enough people think or say that we are under a moral obligation to donate money to charity.

  1. Explain and discuss one critique of the link between religion and morality

    An example of this could be the Catholic ideas that the use of contraception and sex before marriage is morally wrong. In reality a vast number of practising Catholics use contraception or practise sex before marriage and believe that the idea that these acts are sinful is absurd and what is morally wrong is the papal embargo on these actions.

  2. Utilitarianism (Weaknesses and strengths)

    amount of happiness from certain individuals but which are held as morally inexcusable. Imagine that a group of sadistic guards are torturing a prisoner - as their happiness outweighs the prisoner's pain it would seem to be the right thing to do according to utilitarianism; it seems the action is justified, but that isn't morally right.

  1. Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

    Mill believed that engaging in things that made the mind think and were difficult could attain more pleasure once they were understood rather than something that was pleasurable for while but had no real relevance to the intellectual mind. For example, Mill believed there was more value in 'Pushpin than poetry.'

  2. "'Right' and 'wrong' are just expressions of preference; they do not refer to any ...

    This is in the form of our conscience. Our conscience tells us what we believe to be right or wrong and the reasons behind it. It is beneficial because 'good' and 'bad' are self evident and therefore easy to distinguish. We can instantly see if something is right or wrong by logical thinking.

  1. The philosophy of morality.

    Both these theories have their problems. With individual relativism moral debate becomes impossible, because if you accept that the individual may be wrong, you cannot agree with individual relativism as according to this theory the individual cannot be wrong, also individuals could not improve or reform if they were to change their minds. Bertrand Russell (1935)

  2. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    The consequences of ones actions are unpredictable, it is unfeasible to identify how our actions will be received by others and therefore this makes it difficult to determine which actions do and do not promote happiness. The strengths of the utilitarianism theory is that it provides a relatively easy formula for right and wrong.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work