• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sarah Andrews Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality. The word moral [ from the latin word 'mores' meaning customs] is defined in the English dictionary as being 'concerned with right and wrong conduct' and the definition of morality is 'moral principles or rules; goodness or rightness'. The word ethics [ from the greek word 'ethos' ] is defined as meaning 'principles or standards of human conduct - sometimes called morals'. These definitions are what most people would expect but most people do not realise that there are different types of moralism and tend to have their own ideas as to what is morally right. Moral regulation of any kind has been necessary to a societies' well being throughout history. There are two main types of morality theories. Absolute morality is when universal standards of right or wrong apply to all people at all times irrespective of their culture or beliefs. Relative morality is based on the theory that truth and rightness is different for different people or cultures. Some schools of thought believe that morals were formalized into standards of conduct being developed after religious or cultural taboos were violated or when a certain behaviour became a habit. ...read more.

Middle

to promote tolerance of others.Christians, for instance, believe that the Ten Commandments were issued by God [their creator] to remind humankind of their obligations to life and others. Other religions have similar codes on which their faith is based.Unless there is universal belief in one true God there will always be differing opinions of what is right or wrong.Absolutists believe their way is right and could be accused of arrogance. This is illustrated by the work of missionaries that travel to remote cultures to teach them their values. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of moral relativism. Relative morality has had in the past many followers. Supporters of various forms of socialism and non religious groups usually support relativism in some form.An example of this is Marxism, a movement created by a German philosopher called Karl Marx. He argued that morality exists merely to give the ruling classes power. Power to monopolise religion, education. law and morality, allowing them to dictate values to others.Relativists do not believe that any one person should dictate how others conduct their lives. If taken to the extreme this could lead to individuals deciding what is morally right or wrong for themselves. ...read more.

Conclusion

But most social groups are ruled by the few who want the rest to follow their values. In the past this created imbalance in societies, as it does today, giving power to some. When pagen cultures decayed many turned to christianity because it seemed to give moral citizenship to all, even lowly people and slaves. People thought this would rebalance society. Relativism does have some strengths. It teaches tolerance of others who may hold different views, making people examine why different cultures behave as they do and encouraging compromise so that different people of different moral standards can co-exist.Relative morality appears to be more compatible with modern life. Whoever created mankind gave us the intelligence to evolve and adapt which means that moral values will inevitably change.Absolutists would argue that universal morality should exist whatever other changes take place but as long as the common denominator morals remain in place it is impossible to expect individual values to stay the same. Relativism seems to put the responsibility of good moral behaviour with the individual. Whilst we cannot have people behaving exactly how they would like without some consideration for others I think that to make individuals responsible for their own actions is a good moral starting place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    Ethics and religion can be linked by three possibilities. The first is autonomy. Autonomy is a system that holds that morality is autonomous if it is independent of religion. Its principles are justified on the basis of reason alone. It is not necessarily opposed to religion, and can be held by someone with religious beliefs.

  2. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    not give it away because they think that they would be guilty of wrongdoing. Singer's argument erodes this traditional distinction by stating that we ought to give our money away and it is wrong not to do so. We spend our money on clothes we do not necessarily need, so

  1. How Plausible is Cultural Relativism

    Essentially, slavery cannot be considered objectively right or wrong: any moral viewpoint is merely an opinion which differs from culture to culture. Therefore, it does seem that morality is almost arbitrary from a cultural relativist perspective, because it simply becomes a "description of the values held by a particular society

  2. What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point ...

    Relativism is broken down into two main divisions therefore: firstly individual relativism, which states that we cannot even make moral judgments based on culture, but solely on the person involved, and their perception of morality. The latter is cultural relativism, which states that we cannot judge an actions morality without

  1. Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

    Without rules people would do what they wished and say they did it due to consequentialism. This is when right and wrong is posteriori in their determination. For example murder. Religious believers would always see it as wrong. A utilitarian may justify it.

  2. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    We will not use our resources and energies to help somebody else, unless by doing so we help ourselves. Likewise, we will put our life on the line only if we think that, it will cause somebody else to put there lives on the line for us, perhaps by inspiring

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    He created man "in his own image", so life should be honoured and revered. Of course, the various factions of the church have interpreted this in different ways, but the message that undoubtedly shines through concerns the view of The Sanctity Of Life.

  2. Explain how a Hindu marriage service might guide a couple in their married life?

    If someone disagreed with me I would say all the things above. Therefore I believe that we know from looking around us that people are equal. Hinduism attitudes towards other religions. Hinduism contains many different beliefs. Some Hindus follow Krishna as their God, while the others follow Ganesha or a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work