• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the main differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the main differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism (33) Utilitarianism is a teleological (relativist) ethical theory, which follows the concept that the 'end justifies the means' (the value of a moral action is judged according to the end it produces) on the understanding of providing the 'greatest happiness for the greatest number', and is therefore contrary to deontological theories such as Kant's Categorical Imperative. In addition, it is important to declare that the concept of Utilitarianism was devised by Jeremy Bentham, in which he divided his theory into the following three categories: the motivation of human beings; the principle of utility (usefulness); and the hedonic calculus (which takes into account seven elements when deciding the preferable course of action). It is also significant to make reference to John Stuart Mill, who developed Bentham's theory with the intention of altering the emphasis from 'quantity to quality', and distinguished between higher (mind) ...read more.


After studying and reviewing the theory of Utilitarianism (whereby the moral action produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number), it is clearly evident that there are many strengths including that it appears natural to consider the consequences of our actions, avoids the intricacies of a rule based (absolute) approach and complies with a common sense view towards to morality which is practically applicable to real life situations. However, it is also apparent that there are various weaknesses including the fact that the theory ultimately relies on the knowledge of consequences (which may be inaccurate or not become evident until some time in the future) and has the ability to justify practically any action, such as the Nazi persecution of the Jews (if this provided the greatest happiness for the greatest number). A final weakness which I consider to be of paramount importance concerns the hedonic calculus, whereby it is questionable whether an action can be declared morally justified by an empirical test. ...read more.


who will be directly affected, and from this it is possible to determine whether it provides the 'greatest happiness for the greatest number' (such as the case concerning Diane Pretty, who had the support of her family). However, I believe that it is also necessary to recognize that although the practice of euthanasia may promote happiness for the family concerned, other factors such as the financial repercussions may result in the remainder of the family living a lower quality of life, and therefore it could be argued that the practice of euthanasia (in the long term) does not necessarily promote the 'greatest happiness for the greatest number of people'. In conclusion, after reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of Utilitarianism (mentioned above) I believe that it is a practically applicable theory to moral issues such as euthanasia, as its teleological (relativist) approach takes into account individual situations (and circumstances), in contrast to deontological (absolutist) theory's such as Kant's Categorical Imperative and Aquinas' Natural Law, which would oppose this action. (263 words) James Yates 30 mins ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    The state promotes the common good and therefore deserves obedience. This again leads back in to the argument put forward by Aristotle, that being unjust is the equivalent of being unlawful. In this way it is clear that both Aristotle and Plato agree on a framework for which justice should be gained in.

  2. Utilitarianism. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    You can only get one person out of the bus and your mum is stuck on the bus but there is also a scientist who, in his mind, has the cure for cancer.

  1. Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

    - critically examine this view. Some religious believers and some utilitarians can consider Bentham's ideas inadequate. A problem with Bentham's theory and his hedonic calculus is that results are based on a quantative measure. For example, there are two emergencies in a hospital. One is a pregnant women who is expecting twins needs to be

  2. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    has enough money to buy one bowl of food, or you can ask yourself why the political and social system in Bengal is not working as well as ours does. I think that his hypothetical thought experiments, for example the child drowning in the pond, are misleading and irrelevant to the real problem that he is discussing.

  1. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    Looking back to the downloading illegal contents example, although the action can provide convenience and reduced cost to people, which is a good consequence overall. However, the intention of the action is wrong, therefore according to Kant's theory, the action is wrong.

  2. What are the main features of classical utilitarianism? Assess the strengths and weaknesses ...

    The hedonic calculus is easy to follow in certain respects but with the idea of qualitative utilitarianism it becomes very slow to make a decision and so the time of the action would have passed if the decision had to be made immediately.

  1. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    An action cannot be purely measure based on pain and pleasure because some pains are good for you and some pleasures are bad. For example, visiting the dentist when you have a cavity can be painful but it results in good in the long term.

  2. Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality.

    In modern times it could be argued that relativism is a dangerous state. With ever changing technology and ecological evolution having what other cultures consider bad moral codes can cause outrage and conflict in a world that is becoming more dependant on international cooperation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work