• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the main differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the main differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism (33) Utilitarianism is a teleological (relativist) ethical theory, which follows the concept that the 'end justifies the means' (the value of a moral action is judged according to the end it produces) on the understanding of providing the 'greatest happiness for the greatest number', and is therefore contrary to deontological theories such as Kant's Categorical Imperative. In addition, it is important to declare that the concept of Utilitarianism was devised by Jeremy Bentham, in which he divided his theory into the following three categories: the motivation of human beings; the principle of utility (usefulness); and the hedonic calculus (which takes into account seven elements when deciding the preferable course of action). It is also significant to make reference to John Stuart Mill, who developed Bentham's theory with the intention of altering the emphasis from 'quantity to quality', and distinguished between higher (mind) ...read more.


After studying and reviewing the theory of Utilitarianism (whereby the moral action produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number), it is clearly evident that there are many strengths including that it appears natural to consider the consequences of our actions, avoids the intricacies of a rule based (absolute) approach and complies with a common sense view towards to morality which is practically applicable to real life situations. However, it is also apparent that there are various weaknesses including the fact that the theory ultimately relies on the knowledge of consequences (which may be inaccurate or not become evident until some time in the future) and has the ability to justify practically any action, such as the Nazi persecution of the Jews (if this provided the greatest happiness for the greatest number). A final weakness which I consider to be of paramount importance concerns the hedonic calculus, whereby it is questionable whether an action can be declared morally justified by an empirical test. ...read more.


who will be directly affected, and from this it is possible to determine whether it provides the 'greatest happiness for the greatest number' (such as the case concerning Diane Pretty, who had the support of her family). However, I believe that it is also necessary to recognize that although the practice of euthanasia may promote happiness for the family concerned, other factors such as the financial repercussions may result in the remainder of the family living a lower quality of life, and therefore it could be argued that the practice of euthanasia (in the long term) does not necessarily promote the 'greatest happiness for the greatest number of people'. In conclusion, after reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of Utilitarianism (mentioned above) I believe that it is a practically applicable theory to moral issues such as euthanasia, as its teleological (relativist) approach takes into account individual situations (and circumstances), in contrast to deontological (absolutist) theory's such as Kant's Categorical Imperative and Aquinas' Natural Law, which would oppose this action. (263 words) James Yates 30 mins ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality.

    In modern times it could be argued that relativism is a dangerous state. With ever changing technology and ecological evolution having what other cultures consider bad moral codes can cause outrage and conflict in a world that is becoming more dependant on international cooperation.

  2. What are the main features of classical utilitarianism? Assess the strengths and weaknesses ...

    The hedonic calculus is easy to follow in certain respects but with the idea of qualitative utilitarianism it becomes very slow to make a decision and so the time of the action would have passed if the decision had to be made immediately.

  1. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    An action cannot be purely measure based on pain and pleasure because some pains are good for you and some pleasures are bad. For example, visiting the dentist when you have a cavity can be painful but it results in good in the long term.

  2. Utilitarianism. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    Another weakness of the theory is the problem of special responsibilities, in that you have a certain responsibility and duty to your family. Generally you regard these people higher than say a complete stranger. To explain this, an example could be that there is a bus crash.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    intrinsically do not have any moral absolutes so there is never any time when abortion is definitely right or wrong. In the next few pages, then, I will discuss whether, with reference to abortion, the sanctity of life should be regarded as a moral absolute.

  2. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    He asserts that as virtues are not feelings or dispositions, virtues are habits. Hughes criticised this argument as he stated that there are other conditions in the soul which have not been examined, such as thoughts, memories, images and learned skills.

  1. "The greatest happiness for the greatest number" Using ToK thinking and terms, how far ...

    brought about the greatest amount of pleasure to the greatest number, and the manner in which they achieved this is irrelevant. However nearly everyone would agree that this action was morally wrong, and therefore this shows that something that promotes the greatest pleasure for the greatest number is not necessarily morally right.

  2. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    not give it away because they think that they would be guilty of wrongdoing. Singer's argument erodes this traditional distinction by stating that we ought to give our money away and it is wrong not to do so. We spend our money on clothes we do not necessarily need, so

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work