• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain The Ontological Argument From Anselm And Gaunilo's Objections To It

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the Ontological Argument from Anselm and Gaunilo's objections to it Around 1093, the monk Anselm came up with the Ontological Argument; an argument which is Analytic, Deductive and A Priori. In a deductive argument, all the premises are valid, and there are no mistakes in the logic. If you agree with the logic of every premise, then the conclusion gives you proof. If you are able to accept all the premises of Anselm's Ontological Argument, then this gives you proof that God exists. This is the definition of a Deductive Argument. Anselm splits the Ontological Argument into two sections; demonstrating God's existence, and defining what particular existence God must have. These arguments are found in Anselm's book of prayers Proslogian, chapters two and three. In his first argument, Anselm does not try to prove the existence of God, but attempts to demonstrate it. ...read more.

Middle

By popular agreement, it would be greater for their paintings to exist not only in their minds, but in reality for others to grasp. The main strategy Anselm uses to get people to accept his argument more is by using Reductio Ad Absurdum; reducing the opposing argument to present Anselm's argument as the correct one. With the first section of the Ontological Argument, Anselm explains that people who state that 'God does not exist', Psalm 14, are fools. This is because the word 'God' is analytic, and saying that something that cannot not exist 'does not exist' is completely contradictory. Anselm's second section to the Ontological Argument is located in Proslogian Chapter three. Just like in Chapter two, Anselm starts of by defining God in Chapter three as 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived', and when we read this we grasp this concept and it is in our minds, In Intellectu. ...read more.

Conclusion

If you imagine a flying spaghetti, you cannot move from what is said, De Dicto, to what exists in reality, In Re. By using Reductio Ad Absurdum against Anselm, Gaunilo is able to back up his first point. Gaunilo's second counter-argument links with his first; he states that it is possible to define abstract concepts into reality. To make it clearer as to how Anselm does this, Gaunilo presents the idea of the Most Perfect Island. Just because we are able to imagine something so perfect, does not mean we are able to therefore accept its existence. Such an idea would be 'foolish'. The final counter-argument that Gaunilo puts forward is also similar to the previous two. He uses the example that through a conversation, we may have heard about a person and concepts about them. However, even though we have heard about this person in conversation, this does not mean that this person exists in reality. And until we find them we cannot know if their presence exists. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    There are several hundred million Christians who believe the Christian God is worth worshipping. However, there are other religions, which worship other Gods. Therefore, this cannot be a valid criterion for determining whether God exists or not. God both has and continues to communicate with humans.

  2. The ontological argument

    Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege agreed with Kant when criticising the Ontological argument. Russell said that 'Existence is quite definitely not a predicate'. This proposition was based on the idea that it doesn't describe a property of the subject. Frege argued that 'existence' is just another way of saying there

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Davies challenges this argument because he believes that Malcolm has failed to acknowledge the word 'is' can be used in different ways. It can be used to describe something or explain something, while the first is descriptive the latter use tells one nothing only to suppose the existence of the subject.

  2. Explain the Ontological Argument from Anselm and Guanilo’s objections to it (33)

    Anselm's idea of contingency and necessity states that most things in this World are contingent; they depend on other things for their existence. As God is the idea that nothing greater can be thought of, "he" does not just exist, but is necessary, and does not require anything else to

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Hume (1711-1776) argued that although God could exist, he could also not exist, nothing necessarily exists and so even God is contingent, he rejected Anselm's argument purely on the basis that there was no such thing as necessary existence. Kant (1724-1804) also criticised Anselm's argument2 by arguing that the notion of existence is being treated as the wrong logical type.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    of an artist, or that same painting existing in the mind of that same artist and as a physical piece of art. Anselm contends that the painting, existing both within the mind of the artist and as a real piece of art, is greater than the mere mental conception of the work.

  1. Analyse the ontological argument for the existence of God. Do you agree with ...

    be classed as 'priori', this is because it does not use the world around us to prove Gods existence but relies upon our logic. The argument suggests that the concept of God itself, proves its existence. Anslem stated that all humans have the ability to imagine an all perfect, all powerful entity 'that than which none greater exists'.

  2. Consider Crittically the Arguments against the DesignArgument Deomonstrating the Existence of God and assess ...

    The universe is dissimilar to this in that it does not infer a similar cause, for example intelligence, or thought. Also, it takes many people to build a house, so if this analogy is used, then it could be easily postulated there is a team of gods who designed the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work