• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain The Ontological Argument From Anselm And Gaunilo's Objections To It

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the Ontological Argument from Anselm and Gaunilo's objections to it Around 1093, the monk Anselm came up with the Ontological Argument; an argument which is Analytic, Deductive and A Priori. In a deductive argument, all the premises are valid, and there are no mistakes in the logic. If you agree with the logic of every premise, then the conclusion gives you proof. If you are able to accept all the premises of Anselm's Ontological Argument, then this gives you proof that God exists. This is the definition of a Deductive Argument. Anselm splits the Ontological Argument into two sections; demonstrating God's existence, and defining what particular existence God must have. These arguments are found in Anselm's book of prayers Proslogian, chapters two and three. In his first argument, Anselm does not try to prove the existence of God, but attempts to demonstrate it. ...read more.

Middle

By popular agreement, it would be greater for their paintings to exist not only in their minds, but in reality for others to grasp. The main strategy Anselm uses to get people to accept his argument more is by using Reductio Ad Absurdum; reducing the opposing argument to present Anselm's argument as the correct one. With the first section of the Ontological Argument, Anselm explains that people who state that 'God does not exist', Psalm 14, are fools. This is because the word 'God' is analytic, and saying that something that cannot not exist 'does not exist' is completely contradictory. Anselm's second section to the Ontological Argument is located in Proslogian Chapter three. Just like in Chapter two, Anselm starts of by defining God in Chapter three as 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived', and when we read this we grasp this concept and it is in our minds, In Intellectu. ...read more.

Conclusion

If you imagine a flying spaghetti, you cannot move from what is said, De Dicto, to what exists in reality, In Re. By using Reductio Ad Absurdum against Anselm, Gaunilo is able to back up his first point. Gaunilo's second counter-argument links with his first; he states that it is possible to define abstract concepts into reality. To make it clearer as to how Anselm does this, Gaunilo presents the idea of the Most Perfect Island. Just because we are able to imagine something so perfect, does not mean we are able to therefore accept its existence. Such an idea would be 'foolish'. The final counter-argument that Gaunilo puts forward is also similar to the previous two. He uses the example that through a conversation, we may have heard about a person and concepts about them. However, even though we have heard about this person in conversation, this does not mean that this person exists in reality. And until we find them we cannot know if their presence exists. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    Pray, and ask God to provide you with a clear proof for his existence within a week. After that week, if you have got a proof that God exists, then tell people of the evidence. If not, there are only three reasons I can think of that are plausible: (1)

  2. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    because the property of being square is inconsistent with the property of being circular. Since, on Plantinga's view, the concept of a maximally great being is consistent and hence possibly instantiated, it follows that such a being, i.e., God, exists in every possible world.

  1. Consider Crittically the Arguments against the DesignArgument Deomonstrating the Existence of God and assess ...

    The carrot is relevant in that if the analogy is made with the carrot then the mark of design in the world could be caused by something similar to generation or vegetation. The natural world could possess some inner self-regulation and growth.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Maximal excellence is therefore possible, not actual and therefore God is possible not actual. What is the cosmological argument? (33) The cosmological argument is a 'posteriori' argument; this means that unlike the ontological argument in derives that God exists from empirical observations of the world and the universe to conclude that there was a first cause behind it.

  1. Explain the Ontological Argument from Anselm and Guanilo’s objections to it (33)

    Anselm's idea of contingency and necessity states that most things in this World are contingent; they depend on other things for their existence. As God is the idea that nothing greater can be thought of, "he" does not just exist, but is necessary, and does not require anything else to

  2. The ontological argument

    Immanuel Kant is another Christian Philosopher, who lived a century after Descarte, to criticise the Ontological argument. The proposition 'God necessarily exists' is said to be analytic by both Anselm and Descarte, Kant however said that it does not necessarily follow, even thought the proposition is true by definition (that God exists).

  1. The Ontological Argument - Explain and Criticise.

    We are dependent on something else for existence, for example I am dependent on the egg and sperm, a piece of toast is dependent on a toaster and somebody putting a piece of bread in the toaster. However, in the second half of his argument Anselm insisted that God's existence is totally independent and necessary.

  2. The Ontological Argument.

    It is not saying that God's attributes must be greater than anything we can imagine of God. This would ultimately lead nowhere as you could conceive of a God greater than mine (i.e. more powerful), and others to postulate greater things than others ad infinitum.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work