• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Ontological Argument from Anselm and Guanilo’s objections to it (33)

Extracts from this document...


Explain the Ontological Argument from Anselm and Guanilo's objections to it (33) The Ontological Argument, is the study of "Being". This A Priori argument questions what it means for God to exist, and enquires about his nature and characteristics. When concerning subjects and predicates, this argument claims God is the subject, and questions the predicate of his existence. Being A Priori means that the arguments idea suggests we have truth before experience and existence, we already have a concept of the ideas presented. St. Anselm, who wrote the prayer "Proslogion", claimed that the concept of God was "that by which nothing greater can be conceived". He does not argue that you can think of God as the greatest thing in the World, but that you cannot think of anything greater than God. He claims that it is better for something to exist than for it not to exist. E.g. The ideal partner, it is better for it to exist than to be just a fabrication of the mind. ...read more.


This idea of necessity explores that God is eternal and transcends our understanding, being outside of space and time, however he can create and operate within his creation, our universe. Anselm claims that if God did not exist in this way, then we would not exist in the same way. Guanilo of Marmoutier (or on behalf of the fool) opposes Anselm's ideas. He does not agree with the statement "that by which nothing greater can be conceived", and thinks that we can imagine an Island which is greater than another that can be conceived. We can think of another Island, but just because we can define it, it doesn't mean it exists. It does not exist, but is a part of our imagination, like Anselm's idea of the ideal partner. Despite this, Guanilo's criticism is often questioned, Anselm states the idea that nothing greater can be conceived than God. ...read more.


Secondly, from Kant's point of view, he simply states that the Ontological argument does not prove God exists, it assumes that God exists. Another idea is that God's existence is just an invention of the human mind, and not something that evidence can explain. It is possible to talk about or think about God and his existence; however it is not possible to see or touch God. There are counter arguments for these ideas however, and state that just because you cannot touch the idea of "existence", it does not mean it is not a reality. Secondly is the idea that if you believe in something existing, "having existence", or you think it exists, then it does indeed exist. Thirdly, the idea has been created that the Ontological argument appears unsteady, however as it is difficult to pinpoint why exactly it is shaky, it can be argued that it is in fact quite a strong argument. Lastly, Kant's idea further states that the only way we can gain knowledge of the World is through experience, not following the A Priori ideas of the Ontological argument. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    Pray, and ask God to provide you with a clear proof for his existence within a week. After that week, if you have got a proof that God exists, then tell people of the evidence. If not, there are only three reasons I can think of that are plausible: (1)

  2. Explain The Ontological Argument From Anselm And Gaunilo's Objections To It

    Therefore by definition, De Dicta, God exists in reality, thus demonstrating the existence of God. To grasp the idea of In Intellectu and In Re, the example of a painting is used. For many artists, such as Pablo Picasso or Vincent Van Gogh, they would first imagine and plan out what they would wish to paint.

  1. The ontological argument

    Kant concluded that although we cannot deny the inseparability of the subject and predicate we can deny the existence of both the subject and predicate altogether. So we can only know for sure that if God exists he must necessarily exist.

  2. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    It is in this sense that the Cosmological argument is sometimes held to depend on the Ontological, as the Ontological argument starts from the definition that God is the most perfect possible being. Ockham's point might be re-stated by claiming that this position is needed by Christianity but cannot be established by the Cosmological argument.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    If existence was a predicate it would be something that one had or lacked (e.g. blue eyes) This creates a paradox, in saying that something does not exist; how could one conclude that a thing lacks (or even possesses) anything?

  2. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Just as a triangle requires the idea of 3 angles adding up to 180�. If we are to call God "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" it must have all supreme perfections - one being existence. Hume (1711-1776)

  1. The Ontological Argument

    Thus God exists. b) Discuss whether the ontological argument proves the existence of God in reality. (8 marks) St Thomas Aquinas rejected the Ontological argument as a proof of Gods existence. He did so because of the problem of the idea of defining God.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    Anselm would point out that our inability to list all the properties (and presumably they are infinite) shows that `the greatest conceivable island' is not a possible object. And the reason why we can use such reasoning with God is that He is a possible object.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work