• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Ontological Argument from Anselm and Guanilo’s objections to it (33)

Extracts from this document...


Explain the Ontological Argument from Anselm and Guanilo's objections to it (33) The Ontological Argument, is the study of "Being". This A Priori argument questions what it means for God to exist, and enquires about his nature and characteristics. When concerning subjects and predicates, this argument claims God is the subject, and questions the predicate of his existence. Being A Priori means that the arguments idea suggests we have truth before experience and existence, we already have a concept of the ideas presented. St. Anselm, who wrote the prayer "Proslogion", claimed that the concept of God was "that by which nothing greater can be conceived". He does not argue that you can think of God as the greatest thing in the World, but that you cannot think of anything greater than God. He claims that it is better for something to exist than for it not to exist. E.g. The ideal partner, it is better for it to exist than to be just a fabrication of the mind. ...read more.


This idea of necessity explores that God is eternal and transcends our understanding, being outside of space and time, however he can create and operate within his creation, our universe. Anselm claims that if God did not exist in this way, then we would not exist in the same way. Guanilo of Marmoutier (or on behalf of the fool) opposes Anselm's ideas. He does not agree with the statement "that by which nothing greater can be conceived", and thinks that we can imagine an Island which is greater than another that can be conceived. We can think of another Island, but just because we can define it, it doesn't mean it exists. It does not exist, but is a part of our imagination, like Anselm's idea of the ideal partner. Despite this, Guanilo's criticism is often questioned, Anselm states the idea that nothing greater can be conceived than God. ...read more.


Secondly, from Kant's point of view, he simply states that the Ontological argument does not prove God exists, it assumes that God exists. Another idea is that God's existence is just an invention of the human mind, and not something that evidence can explain. It is possible to talk about or think about God and his existence; however it is not possible to see or touch God. There are counter arguments for these ideas however, and state that just because you cannot touch the idea of "existence", it does not mean it is not a reality. Secondly is the idea that if you believe in something existing, "having existence", or you think it exists, then it does indeed exist. Thirdly, the idea has been created that the Ontological argument appears unsteady, however as it is difficult to pinpoint why exactly it is shaky, it can be argued that it is in fact quite a strong argument. Lastly, Kant's idea further states that the only way we can gain knowledge of the World is through experience, not following the A Priori ideas of the Ontological argument. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    equivalent to the claim that the concept of a maximally great being is not self-contradictory; for the only things that don't exist in any possible world are things that are conceptually defined in terms of contradictory properties. There is no logically possible world in which a square circle exists (given the relevant concepts)

  2. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    Not any of the existing religions can provide such a God. If there is a being that has either failed or not tried to communicate with us that being is not worth worshipping either, so the ontological evidence against God holds, even without complete knowledge of the world.

  1. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    All that it is reasonable to do is to propose a cause adequate to explain the effect, and this will be a finite cause. Hume asks why one should not postulate male and female gods who are born and die, as the closer the analogy between causes in the world

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    This is unacceptable because one could define anything into existence. Many have dismissed Plantinga's argument attacking his concept of 'possible worlds'. Criticism focuses on his assumption that there is a being with 'maximal excellence' in every world means that such a being must exist in our world.

  1. The ontological argument

    Kant argues that it is possible to accept that a proposal is true by definition (the subject and predicate of the proposition are inseparable) and yet the subject doesn't refer to anything in this world. There are inseparable predicates that when taken from the concept of the subject cease to

  2. Consider Crittically the Arguments against the DesignArgument Deomonstrating the Existence of God and assess ...

    One specific area can't be projected to another part, or the whole of nature. A baker is nothing like the bread he makes, can we therefore infer God is nothing like the universe He created? If so it gives us no indication into what God is like.

  1. The ontological argument

    He agreed that this was a correct definition of God, but not that it proves God's reality. Plantinga argued in support of the ontological argument, but presented his own explanation for the logical existence of God. He presented the idea pf 'possible worlds' - that every single possible scenario in

  2. The Ontological Argument.

    It does not exist!]...For if that greater than which cannot be thought can be thought of as not existing, then that greater than which cannot be thought is not that greater than which cannot be thought...

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work