• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what Aristotle meant by the 'final cause'.

Extracts from this document...


Explain what Aristotle meant by the 'final cause'. What causes change and motion? Plato denied the reality of change. It was a quality only of the visible world, of which we could have no certain knowledge. But Aristotle, gradually breaking away from the philosophy of his beloved teacher, came to think that change was real and had to be explained. To explain how a thing comes to be as it is Aristotle developed his theory of the Four Causes The translation of "cause" is misleading, but traditional. The closest meaning to that word would be "explanatory factor". The "four causes" provide answers to four questions one might ask about something, for example, a man: "What is it made from?" "Flesh and so on" (material cause - material is not enough however on its own to make the object whatever it is. Material is necessary but it does not give us the whole answer. ) "What is its form or essence?" "A two-legged creature capable of reason" (formal cause - this is the characteristics that make the object fit into whatever category it fits into. ...read more.


It is this fourth, final cause which is the most important, and which in Aristotle's view gives the best explanation of an object. The fial end, or the purpose, or teleology of a thing, when realized gives that thing its full perfection and reality. The function of a light bulb is the power to give out light. If it should lose this ability and if this could not be restored, then it will no longer be a light bulb. When something is doing what it is meant to, or has developed into whatever it was supposed to develop into, it ahs achieved its goodness. The purpose of the object for Aristotle is part of the object itself, and not something which we might choose or impose on it - it is intrinsic. "Aristotle was wrong to imagine that everything has a purpose." All the different elements of nature have a purpose, according to Aristotle, and nothing is excessive (superfluous). He considers that everything acts or is actualized for an end or a purpose - this is its telos - and this is in some sense its cause. ...read more.


So, there is purpose in things that come to be and exist by nature. Also mistakes do occur. The literate man will write incorrectly, the doctor will give the wrong dose; so it is clearly possible, too, for mistakes to happen in things that are in accordance with nature and Aristotle didn't deny that. He tried to show that like man nature was not always perfect. There would be "monsters". I think that Aristotle was right and that everything does have a purpose but mistakes do happen. The most common argument that is usually brought forward is that what is the purpose of evil? The answer however is very simple if there was no evil how would we know what good is? There are also things in the universe that at this moment you would not know the purpose for like centuries before us people didn't know what trees were for, but now we know that they are essential as they provide us with oxygen. We obviously don't have the answer for everything but in the future we probably would be able to find a purpose for most things even insects that you really think are useless. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain what Aristotle meant by the 'final cause'.

    God the ultimate final cause, starting with ordinary examination, Aristotle notes that things move, and that the source of their movement is some other moving thing. If what efficiently causes to move is always some other thing, then there can never be an original efficient cause of movement itself.

  2. Explain What Is Meant By Natural Law

    For example, helping somebody with the shopping should be done as an act of kindness rather than a way to gain. The main Telos nature attempted to follow was Survival. This would make such acts as killing Bad. Aristotle believed Precepts.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Yet there are very few today that accept his theory wholesale. In particular the following areas have been attacked the historical and anthropological evidence regarding the primal horde, psychological evidence regarding the Oedipus complex, Freud's dependence on the primal horde and his conclusion that religion should be overthrown.

  2. Aristotle believed that everything has a cause. He saw four different explanations for ...

    The sculptor is the Efficient Cause of the statue and he is the means by which the statue comes into being. The prime mover is not the Efficient cause of the change, rather the Prime Mover is the purpose or reason for motion.

  1. Describe Aristotle's teaching about the difference between the final cause and other sorts of ...

    Aristotle also said that "cause" may be understood on four different levels. The first is "material cause" which defines the things that an object is made of. For example, the "material" cause of a statue is the marble, clay etc that it was made from.

  2. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    These two illustrations are trying to indicate that this is not a good enough response to the evidence for anthropic coincidences. Fred Hoyle supports this view: 'A component has evidently been missing from cosmological studies. The origin of the Universe, like the solution of the rubik cube, requires an intelligence'1 '....

  1. Explain What is Meant By Relativism

    This was known as Rational Thought, and the teachings which emphasized the importance of these brought about many people to become Philosophers, and to try to discover more about the truths of life. Even though Ethical Relativism allows people to gain more freedom than following Absolutism, and is able to

  2. What is Knowledge? Explain and Illustrate

    Someone could say 'I know Bob' because they have actually experienced him with their senses, for example they have physically seen Bob. However; someone could say 'I know Bob' even though they have never met Bob. They could know facts about Bob - for example 'I know that Bob has brown hair' or 'I know Bob lives in Cardiff'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work