• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what is meant by meta-ethics (33)b) "Words such as 'right' are meaningless". Discuss. (17)

Extracts from this document...


Ethics Kimberley Moore 12Hr a) Explain what is meant by meta-ethics (33) b) "Words such as 'right' are meaningless". Discuss. (17) a) Meta-ethics explores the meaning and function of moral language. An example of a ethical question is "What do we mean when we say sex before marriage is good? There are three theories which are important to meta-ethics. These are ethical naturalism (or definism), intuitionism (ethical non-naturalism) and emotivism (ethical non-cognitivism). Ethical naturalism is the view ethical terms can be defined or explained using the same 'natural' terms that we would use to define mathematics or science and the morals should be based on the same kind of observation of the world as used in science. Naturalists believe that moral conclusions can be deduced from non-moral premises, or you can discover something is wrong from observation and analysis. ...read more.


In his book he also said that the word "good" cannot be defined. It is a simple idea that cannot be broken down or simplified, unlike horse, which is a complex idea that can be reduced and made further. Moore came up with the "naturalistic fallacy". He said that to define and ethical judgement as a factual one is an error, that to define goodness as the greatest pleasure or the most happiness is to propagate a fallacy. He believed that moral judgements could never be proved empirically (to verify by sense perceptions). The philosopher H.A Prichard furthered this theory. Prichard thought there were two different types of thinking - intuition and reasoning. The difference between the two being reasoning collects the facts and intuition determines which course to follow. For example in deciding whether or not to have an abortion our reason collects all the facts involved and our intuition uses these facts to decide which course of action to follow. ...read more.


Synthetic statements are those that can be identified through sense perceptions ("The book is under the bed") and analytic statements are those that are true by definition ("1+1=2"). Any other facts such as a religious belief are therefore counted as meaningless, as they cannot be proved either analytically or synthetically. Another philosopher called C.L Stevenson developed Ayers ideas, he maintained that moral judgements contain two elements, an expression of attitude based on belief and a persuasive element which seeks to influence others. Stevenson came up with the "hurrah boo" theory to explain this. For example if I am for abortion, I say "HURRAH TO ABORTION" but if I were against it I would say "BOO TO ABORTION". Stevenson's development of the theory gave it more meaning to moral disagreements, which in Ayers view were just noisy shouting matches. b) Words such as right are meaningless because it is a simple idea. Right cannot be broken down into different categories, such as good. Also it cannot be proved analytically or synthetically, making it meaningless. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain the difference between Meta ethics and Normative ethics.

    When considering a course of an action phrases like "Will this hurt me?" or "Will this hurt others?" Whether we do something or not are determined by what we think the consequences will be, whether we think they will be good or bad.

  2. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    If I say that my teacher is the best, then I am trying to influence people to my point of view and hopefully adopt it. Stevenson gives meaning to moral disagreement whereas; Ayer's view was simply that they were shouting matches.

  1. Clarify and explain the key concepts of situational ethics

    ethics theory: Pragmatism: This basically means that the proposed course of action must work, and must work towards the end, which is love. Relativism: Situation ethics is relativistic.

  2. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    First of all, to gather a more detailed source of information, I think that the sources I have used should be studied in more depth, to form an informed view on the sanctity of life; I will look at how different people have interpreted the sanctity of life and formulate

  1. A classmate has cheated. You have seen him/her. Discuss the several elements from a ...

    How can people judge what is right or wrong. From which points of view should this case to be studied. These are all the topics which will be covered by the essay. Prior to analysing the case, it is important to know what is ethics and what is moral.

  2. Explain how Meta-Ethics differs from Normative Ethics.

    Outline how philosophers have historically tried to define moral goodness. Although Aristotle studied with Plato for many years, he rejected important aspects of Plato's thought. Plato believed that there was something, goodness itself, or "the form of the good", that was independent of any particular good thing.

  1. How Successful is The Co-operative Banks Ethical policy?

    The use of animals in sport where they are used to catch, fight or kill one another. It is key in the objectives of the scheme that customer consultation should be high, and the bank should act in the interests of it customers rather that its management.

  2. Utilitarianism is a contrast to classic approaches to ethics. One of the main features ...

    One of the problems with the Hedonic Calculus was that it judged the quantity of happiness i.e. the number of people but not the quality of the happiness therefore problems arise in assessing it's value. Different pleasures bring different amounts of happiness to different people but in Bentham�s theory all pleasures are equal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work