• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion? (33)

Extracts from this document...


Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion? (33) Meta-ethicists study the meaning of moral judgements and analyse the reasoning behind ethical systems. They limit themselves to studying the nature of morality and meaning of moral judgements. Meta-ethics concentrate more on the reasoning rather than content of ethical statements. There are four main theories that are used when studying ethical language. Intuitionists claim that morality is self-evident. An intuitions is thought of as someone who holds a particular view about the way in which we come to find out which of our actions are right and wrong. W.D. Ross was one of the main scholars who pioneered this theory. He had been greatly influenced by the earlier work of Moore and Prichard. He argued that what was 'right' and 'obligatory' were just as indefinable as 'good'. Toss defined 'right' as: "...suitable, in a unique and indefinable way which we may express by the phrase 'morally suitable' to the situation in which an individual finds himself" (Foundation of Ethics) He drew a clear distinction between what is right to do and what is good to do. ...read more.


theory: 'x is wrong' or 'I disagree with x' = 'Boo!' 'x is right' or 'I agree with x' = 'Hurrah!' It can be said that emotivism is merely based on personal opinion rather than a complex moral theory. If all of our behaviour is based on how we feel and out psychological response to things, how often can we be sure of anything? there must be a stronger case for making out ethical decisions that simply approving and disapproving of certain actions. The questions that Emotivism left open spurred on scholars to dig deeper and to study the philosophy of meta-ethics more analytically. The original group of philosophers involved in this were known as the 'Vienna Circle' - founded by M.Schlick, R.Carnap and O.Newrath in the 1920's. In 1929, the Vienna Circle published a paper saying that the main objective was to establish the necessary criteria for talking meaningfully about the world. These meta-ethicists are known as Logical Positivists. Logical Positivism is about establishing the ways in which the truth or falsehood of certain statements can be shown. therefore, if a statement cannot be proved either true or false, it is meaningless. ...read more.


this theory also fails to suggest where our ethics come from. It only states that we pass a judgement and then make a suggestion on what should be done about it. Once again, through prescriptive statements, we've merely expressed a personal opinion rather than a black and white absolute. b) How far do you consider these views can be justified? All of the meta-ethical theories that I have looked at have shown that moral truth is relative. Most, if not all ethical viewpoints are simply personal opinions rather than absolute moral law. Logical Positivism can to a certain extent say whether something is good or bad - depending on whether it has empirical evidence or blatant truth to support it. Even so, a large portion of important ethical statements are discarded as 'meaningless' just because they are not analytical or synthetic. This goes to show that you can never find a way to absolute truth by studying meta-ethics. In a pluralistic society there are bound to be conflicts and overlap when it comes to moral and ethical standards, so I can understand why scholars say that ethical statements are no more than expression of opinion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    For instance, to judge that someone is 'just' is to ascribe a property to him, the property of a properly ruled psyche. Therefore ethics is central to the agent; the person must have the property of something to perform the properties relevant action.

  2. Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions ...

    These opinions are forms of approval or disapproval of an ethical idea. An example of this is when people say 'Euthanasia is wrong'. According to Emotivist scholars, this statement cannot be verified or proven to be true or false, as 'wrong' is expressing feelings of disapproval.

  1. Explain how Meta-Ethics differs from Normative Ethics.

    The moral sense of good refers to actions, consequences, situations, people, choices and lifestyles. 3. Assess the theories; Intuitionism, Emotivism and Prescriptivism when it comes to an understanding of ethical language. Intuitionism was interpreted by three main people and came up with theories for themselves.

  2. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    Moral disagreements are not really disagreements at all. For example if two travellers are trying to reach a destination, and disagree about the route, the principle is decided on and agreed but the best course of action was disrupted. The other ingredient in a moral statement is the intention to influence the feelings of approval and disapproval of others.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    A situationist would look at the outcome and not see this as an immoral action as the woman was doing the loving thing by protecting her children. The point of situation ethics is not to forget the rules; a situationist does not start from nothing.

  2. Explain ethical egoism. Do you believe that it is true? Why or why not?

    Even when they are helping others, individuals cannot refrain from acting in a personal self-interest. Individuals can complete unselfish acts, but they cannot have unselfish desires. Ethical egoism is concerned with the motives that people ought to have, the view acknowledges that people can choose to act altruistically, but condemns such actions when they do happen.

  1. Discuss whether moral judgements are subjective or objective

    Emotivism is a subjective approach which believes that moral judgements are simply a matter of taste. A.J Ayer is the main person which we associate with this view. In the same way as it would be considered alright for a person to express their taste in music as different from another's.

  2. "'Right' and 'wrong' are just expressions of preference; they do not refer to any ...

    Intuitionism is a widely accepted theory; one we use everyday. It shows the benefit of our in built intuition, which we all can recognise as being there because we can all feel its presence. This is in the form of our conscience.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work