• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion? (33)

Extracts from this document...


Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion? (33) Meta-ethicists study the meaning of moral judgements and analyse the reasoning behind ethical systems. They limit themselves to studying the nature of morality and meaning of moral judgements. Meta-ethics concentrate more on the reasoning rather than content of ethical statements. There are four main theories that are used when studying ethical language. Intuitionists claim that morality is self-evident. An intuitions is thought of as someone who holds a particular view about the way in which we come to find out which of our actions are right and wrong. W.D. Ross was one of the main scholars who pioneered this theory. He had been greatly influenced by the earlier work of Moore and Prichard. He argued that what was 'right' and 'obligatory' were just as indefinable as 'good'. Toss defined 'right' as: "...suitable, in a unique and indefinable way which we may express by the phrase 'morally suitable' to the situation in which an individual finds himself" (Foundation of Ethics) He drew a clear distinction between what is right to do and what is good to do. ...read more.


theory: 'x is wrong' or 'I disagree with x' = 'Boo!' 'x is right' or 'I agree with x' = 'Hurrah!' It can be said that emotivism is merely based on personal opinion rather than a complex moral theory. If all of our behaviour is based on how we feel and out psychological response to things, how often can we be sure of anything? there must be a stronger case for making out ethical decisions that simply approving and disapproving of certain actions. The questions that Emotivism left open spurred on scholars to dig deeper and to study the philosophy of meta-ethics more analytically. The original group of philosophers involved in this were known as the 'Vienna Circle' - founded by M.Schlick, R.Carnap and O.Newrath in the 1920's. In 1929, the Vienna Circle published a paper saying that the main objective was to establish the necessary criteria for talking meaningfully about the world. These meta-ethicists are known as Logical Positivists. Logical Positivism is about establishing the ways in which the truth or falsehood of certain statements can be shown. therefore, if a statement cannot be proved either true or false, it is meaningless. ...read more.


this theory also fails to suggest where our ethics come from. It only states that we pass a judgement and then make a suggestion on what should be done about it. Once again, through prescriptive statements, we've merely expressed a personal opinion rather than a black and white absolute. b) How far do you consider these views can be justified? All of the meta-ethical theories that I have looked at have shown that moral truth is relative. Most, if not all ethical viewpoints are simply personal opinions rather than absolute moral law. Logical Positivism can to a certain extent say whether something is good or bad - depending on whether it has empirical evidence or blatant truth to support it. Even so, a large portion of important ethical statements are discarded as 'meaningless' just because they are not analytical or synthetic. This goes to show that you can never find a way to absolute truth by studying meta-ethics. In a pluralistic society there are bound to be conflicts and overlap when it comes to moral and ethical standards, so I can understand why scholars say that ethical statements are no more than expression of opinion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. "'Right' and 'wrong' are just expressions of preference; they do not refer to any ...

    This is in the form of our conscience. Our conscience tells us what we believe to be right or wrong and the reasons behind it. It is beneficial because 'good' and 'bad' are self evident and therefore easy to distinguish. We can instantly see if something is right or wrong by logical thinking.

  2. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    If I say that my teacher is the best, then I am trying to influence people to my point of view and hopefully adopt it. Stevenson gives meaning to moral disagreement whereas; Ayer's view was simply that they were shouting matches.

  1. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    A.J Ayer is the main advocated of this theory. He maintains that to state: 'murder is wrong' is categorically meaningless. It is not true by definition (bachelors are unmarried males) nor is it true by observation. This proposal is merely a reflection of an individual's opinion towards the intended act.

  2. Euthanasia can never be justified

    The patient requests euthanasia because of a passing phase of their disease, on which their pain and suffering is especially bad, and they are not aware that it will be better after this phase. When a person asks for euthanasia the effect it might have on others should also be

  1. Utilitarianism is a good ethical theory. Why and why not?

    We can never see for certain what will happen in the future, we can only try to predict. There might be an unseen consequence to an action, or some unavoidable, unforeseen disaster - and when the consequences of an action determine whether it was "right" or "wrong" this is a

  2. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    So what does this say about a Utilitarian's view on Abortion? If, according to Utilitarianism, a morally right action is whatever produces the greatest pleasure (and therefore, according to utilitarianism, happiness)

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    drawn between the absolute equality we think of in mathematics and the rough, approximate equality which is what we have to be content with in dealing with objects with our senses.' It is clear then that empirical reasoning appears to be unsound for dealing with knowledge or ethics in Plato's opinion.

  2. At the beginning of evaluating the necessity for ethical principles it is logical to ...

    Another issue is the deception. It should be avoided at any point. If the researcher believes that it's necessary then the participant must be provided with a thorough explanation as soon as possible. It is important that the participant understands the effect of the research to avoid any sense of unease.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work