• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Gap between reason and emotion

Extracts from this document...


Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decision? Moral decision is the principle of concerning right and wrong or good or bad behavior. "Morality is one of those basic aspects of humanity, like sexuality and easting, that cant fit into one or two academic fields" (Jonathan Haidt) How do we justify moral decisions? There are many forms of justifying moral decisions such through the epistemologies of reasons and emotions. However, even though both reasons and emotions are important, they are not equally necessary in justifying moral decision. Reason is a cause or an explanation for something that has happened or that somebody has done. It is also a fact that validates a particular action. Moreover, through reasons, it is also the power of the mind to think in a logical way, and to understand and have opinions. On the other hand, emotion is a strong feeling such as love, fear, or anger that is the part of a person's character that consists of feelings, magnifying certainty on a personal stance. As a result, in this essay, I shall explain how reason is more necessary in justifying moral decisions rather than through emotion, even though emotions are added with reason that will result in a strong justification of moral decision. ...read more.


Through this we are able to see that reason magnifies only upon the affected party, while emotion focuses upon the implementing party. However, according to "the utilitarian theory" of "the greatest happiness of the greatest number" (Woolman, Michael) as this case study's conflict is mainly between Fumika and people in the US, only with the decision of punishment in jail for example, would focus on the well-being of everybody because it wouldn't be an excuse for other coming crimes. Nevertheless, the interrelation between the two epistemologies fills the gap of ambiguity in justifying the Japanese's mother's psychology and America's response to the act. However, through her own reasoning of Japanese Culture, leaving her children alone after her death will even cause them more harm because no one will take care of them and the high shame culture of Japan will make her children be prejudiced on. Moreover, in Japanese Culture, a mother makes choices until her child reaches age ten, whereas according to the American Law, when a child is born, even when they are still in the womb, he/she is already one body alone that should make decisions on his/her own. In addition, emotion is another important factor in justifying moral decisions. Even though these emotions are personal feelings and people usually act emotionally because of reasons and facts related to the problem or decision and is mainly based on "the self-interest theory" (Woolman, Michael) ...read more.


These sympathy and sad emotions are another step in justifying the moral decision because these emotions are only caused by the result of the reasons and the facts that come before in this logical thinking process. As a result, with both of these aspects, reasons and emotions, as they are put in a logical way like premises, it will create a strong justification and conclusion of moral decisions that he has spread to the viewers in this world. As a result, I think reason is a stronger factor and is more necessary to justifying moral decision than motions, however when we act emotionally to reasons and when both of these factors are combined, it will come up to a stronger justification of moral decision. Like in "A Tragedy in Santa Monica" by using both reason and emotion, Fumika gets the punishment she deserves which is counseling without a jail time punishment. Moreover, in "An Inconvenient Truth," Al Gore used both reasons and emotions to justify his message of the ethical and moral decision for environmental aspects that will influence millions of people and other living things in this world. Thus, even though both reason and emotion is not equally necessary to justify moral decision, it is a stronger argument of moral decision if one uses both reason and emotion. With this combination of reason and emotion in a logical way, people's mind will be more influenced to support one's moral decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. TOK Essay: Reason and Emotion

    Since no one can absolutely ignore one of this traits, they are both necessary in making moral decisions, and the amount of their necessity depends on the individual who is making the moral decision. In an ideal world moral decisions would be justified through reason and reason alone.

  2. Explain how a Hindu marriage service might guide a couple in their married life?

    The entire world is part of one unified whole. The plants, other animal species, and humans are all part of the ever- changing stream of life, so that in some ways, harming another living thing is the same as harming as yourself, and they believe that it is wrong to be prejudiced against someone else just because of their ethnic origin.

  1. How Plausible is Cultural Relativism

    Nevertheless, it still raises doubts over the credibility of Rachels' argument. It is also possible to question Rachels' assertation that different societies have different moral codes. All societies, for instance, prohibit murder, rape and steeling which are all actions that most humans consider morally wrong regardless of the society that they are from.

  2. "The greatest happiness for the greatest number" Using ToK thinking and terms, how far ...

    Therefore we can conclude that happiness comes from our emotion, and the individual determines his/her happiness. Our emotion affects greatly our determination of happiness, even if we know it is not a good thing for us in the long run (e.g.

  1. Do Some of Us Take the Moral High Ground?

    live in a society that does not value life,it is a society not worth living in,Cohen 1998.Cohen refers to tht introduction of technology as a minefield for conflict.With the introduction of the respirator machine for example.Life can be manipulated at the whim of their operators The shortening of life by

  2. How people make decisions.

    This very same method of reasoning took place in the minds of those who made decisions concerning the September 11th attack. People began to try and construct logical explanations based on their past experiences. They began to reason that since, in the past, the Al Queda organization had organized movements

  1. Kant’s moral theory

    Thus a person does something merely because he/she is afraid not to do it (such as the fear of being imprisoned for not repaying a debt) is not a moral person: nor is a person moral who repays a debt merely because he/she to, or inclines towards doing that rather than something else.

  2. Can there be a coherent Relativism?

    This is specifically the question of whether any one is more qualified than any other to judge the moral worth or 'rightness' or 'wrongness' of an action than anyone else. Benn1wanted to draw a distinction here between 'authority in' and 'authority on'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work