• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Generally, science and Christianity are considered two contradictory views of the universe. Science symbolizes an evolutionary and naturalistic view of the universe from which God is (or at least can be) excluded. Christianity symbolizes a world view w...

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Generally, science and Christianity are considered two contradictory views of the universe. Science symbolizes an evolutionary and naturalistic view of the universe from which God is (or at least can be) excluded. Christianity symbolizes a world view where everything is created by the direct creative act of God. Science offers us different ways at looking at the origins of life. Its two most famous theories are the Big Bang and the theory of evolution. The Big Bang theory is that there was a gigantic explosion caused by the matter of the universe which was densely squashed and caused the universe and life. This theory could offer a better explanation than Christianity because it has certain aspects to prove it - e.g. ...read more.

Middle

Science also uses Darwin's Theory of Evolution to help explain the origins of life. This theory states that animals and plants adapt to their surroundings and evolve. This tries exclude from the equation. This theory could offer a better explanation because it shows how God didn't need to create us because we have been able to adapt and evolve be ourselves over many years. Unfortunately, the theory only explains how animals and plants adapt and not where the universe came from and how we came to be. Also progress in genetics has not helped the evolution notion; the accidental profession claimed in evolution is thought to be brought about by chance mutations in the genome. ...read more.

Conclusion

This view could be the best explanation because you don't worry about anything and just live your life. So, in conclusion neither science nor Christianity can offer an explanation better than each other because no one truly knows about the origins of life. Christianity offers a story, not really proof, about God's qualities. Science is about the natural around us and can't prove whether someone like God exists and if he could create us. In my opinion we need both explanations because they provide both sides of the argument for the existence of life because one explains how we came to be and the other is what we have become. Also science and religion combines with scientists who believe in God so they would use both concepts. So, science doesn't offer a better explanation than Christianity but it does sometimes seem more logical. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Is Galileo considered a "hero" or "anti-hero"?

    He had a great desire for scientific research, a thing this that makes him even more a 'hero' His great enthusiasm and passion towards science, is shown on the conversation he has with his friend Sagredo where he says: "The lure of proof is too great.

  2. Does the universe have a purpose? Discuss.Every culture in the world and most religions ...

    Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) stated that there is no case known (nor indeed is it possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself, because in that case it would be prior to itself, which is impossible.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    carry out the actions, does this not suggest that he has pre-ordained evil. If he I not aware of this and the actions took him by surprise, surely this causes problems to his omnipotence? Thus, the freewill defence has many problems associated with it.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    The significance of the principle of ignorance can be easily missed. It implies that the big bang singularity behaves in a completely unpredictable manner in the sense that no physical laws govern its behavior. The unpredictability of the singularity is not simply an epistemic affair, meaning that 'we humans cannot

  1. How Certain Can We Be About Science?

    Further to this, each person has a different perception of the world. This is formed in part by the way each individual's nerve system and brain are shaped, the formation of their sensory equipment, their upbringing and education and their personal belief system.

  2. "God is dead" - The Gay Science

    The fundamental principle, however, in both perspectives, is that God never dies and, in some form or another, always exists. Nietzsche felt that humans had 'killed' God, in the sense that they had created their own versions to profit themselves individually.

  1. Man and the Universe

    Venus, Earth and the moon, Saturn, Jupiter and the fixed stars * The earth rotated on an daily rotation, annual rotation and annual tilting of its axis * The planets all rotate in identical circular patterns * The earth was closer to the sun than to the stars.

  2. Did God Create The World or was it Created by Chance?

    machine which was created to move the little flagellum a little bit took many years to create and was very complex it should be even harder to make everything else in the bacterium and to say it was created by chance would be preposterous.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work