• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Generally, science and Christianity are considered two contradictory views of the universe. Science symbolizes an evolutionary and naturalistic view of the universe from which God is (or at least can be) excluded. Christianity symbolizes a world view w...

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Generally, science and Christianity are considered two contradictory views of the universe. Science symbolizes an evolutionary and naturalistic view of the universe from which God is (or at least can be) excluded. Christianity symbolizes a world view where everything is created by the direct creative act of God. Science offers us different ways at looking at the origins of life. Its two most famous theories are the Big Bang and the theory of evolution. The Big Bang theory is that there was a gigantic explosion caused by the matter of the universe which was densely squashed and caused the universe and life. This theory could offer a better explanation than Christianity because it has certain aspects to prove it - e.g. ...read more.

Middle

Science also uses Darwin's Theory of Evolution to help explain the origins of life. This theory states that animals and plants adapt to their surroundings and evolve. This tries exclude from the equation. This theory could offer a better explanation because it shows how God didn't need to create us because we have been able to adapt and evolve be ourselves over many years. Unfortunately, the theory only explains how animals and plants adapt and not where the universe came from and how we came to be. Also progress in genetics has not helped the evolution notion; the accidental profession claimed in evolution is thought to be brought about by chance mutations in the genome. ...read more.

Conclusion

This view could be the best explanation because you don't worry about anything and just live your life. So, in conclusion neither science nor Christianity can offer an explanation better than each other because no one truly knows about the origins of life. Christianity offers a story, not really proof, about God's qualities. Science is about the natural around us and can't prove whether someone like God exists and if he could create us. In my opinion we need both explanations because they provide both sides of the argument for the existence of life because one explains how we came to be and the other is what we have become. Also science and religion combines with scientists who believe in God so they would use both concepts. So, science doesn't offer a better explanation than Christianity but it does sometimes seem more logical. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Is Galileo considered a "hero" or "anti-hero"?

    Here, Galileo is shown very self-centered and irrational because his request is very absurd in that circumstance. He is presented as a very passionate and dedicated person who spent almost his entire life proving that his ideas about the universe were right.

  2. Does the universe have a purpose? Discuss.Every culture in the world and most religions ...

    Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) stated that there is no case known (nor indeed is it possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself, because in that case it would be prior to itself, which is impossible.

  1. How Certain Can We Be About Science?

    Further to this, each person has a different perception of the world. This is formed in part by the way each individual's nerve system and brain are shaped, the formation of their sensory equipment, their upbringing and education and their personal belief system.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Thus, Irenaeus theodicy can be used to explain why some natural evil is essential as well as moral evil. Evaluation of the Irenaeus theodicy Irenaeus theodicy is well respected amongst philosophers. It allows for the modern concept of evolution and avoids Augustine's stumbling block of evil appearing from no where.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    This relation states that (delta p)*(delta q) = h/(4*pi), which implies that if the position of a particle is definitely predictable then its momentum is not, and vice versa. The principle of ignorance is stronger in that it implies that one can definitely predict neither the position nor the momentum of any particles emitted from a singularity.

  2. Free essay

    God and The Universe

    'How did the world get started?' is a question of origin. 'Why are we here?' 'What is keeping us in existence?' is concerned with the underlying ground of all being. It is for this reason that whenever theologians talk about God they couple it with the idea of God the sustainer.

  1. "God is dead" - The Gay Science

    This is perhaps derived from the teachings of evolution through biology, or the Darwinian Theory. In other words, many young people feel attracted to the idea of a God that changes constantly with time and circumstances, as opposed to an eternal God.

  2. Compare Utilitarianism with the religion that you have studiedUtilitarianism VS Christianity

    The LORD was grieved that he had made man on the earth, and his heart was filled with pain.' (Genesis 6:5-6). The destruction of the world would not only deal with the problem of sin but, despite the immediate displeasure associated with it would in the long-term make God happy, and the world a better place.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work