• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Generally, science and Christianity are considered two contradictory views of the universe. Science symbolizes an evolutionary and naturalistic view of the universe from which God is (or at least can be) excluded. Christianity symbolizes a world view w...

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Generally, science and Christianity are considered two contradictory views of the universe. Science symbolizes an evolutionary and naturalistic view of the universe from which God is (or at least can be) excluded. Christianity symbolizes a world view where everything is created by the direct creative act of God. Science offers us different ways at looking at the origins of life. Its two most famous theories are the Big Bang and the theory of evolution. The Big Bang theory is that there was a gigantic explosion caused by the matter of the universe which was densely squashed and caused the universe and life. This theory could offer a better explanation than Christianity because it has certain aspects to prove it - e.g. ...read more.

Middle

Science also uses Darwin's Theory of Evolution to help explain the origins of life. This theory states that animals and plants adapt to their surroundings and evolve. This tries exclude from the equation. This theory could offer a better explanation because it shows how God didn't need to create us because we have been able to adapt and evolve be ourselves over many years. Unfortunately, the theory only explains how animals and plants adapt and not where the universe came from and how we came to be. Also progress in genetics has not helped the evolution notion; the accidental profession claimed in evolution is thought to be brought about by chance mutations in the genome. ...read more.

Conclusion

This view could be the best explanation because you don't worry about anything and just live your life. So, in conclusion neither science nor Christianity can offer an explanation better than each other because no one truly knows about the origins of life. Christianity offers a story, not really proof, about God's qualities. Science is about the natural around us and can't prove whether someone like God exists and if he could create us. In my opinion we need both explanations because they provide both sides of the argument for the existence of life because one explains how we came to be and the other is what we have become. Also science and religion combines with scientists who believe in God so they would use both concepts. So, science doesn't offer a better explanation than Christianity but it does sometimes seem more logical. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Is Galileo considered a "hero" or "anti-hero"?

    He had a great desire for scientific research, a thing this that makes him even more a 'hero' His great enthusiasm and passion towards science, is shown on the conversation he has with his friend Sagredo where he says: "The lure of proof is too great.

  2. "God is dead" - The Gay Science

    The fundamental principle, however, in both perspectives, is that God never dies and, in some form or another, always exists. Nietzsche felt that humans had 'killed' God, in the sense that they had created their own versions to profit themselves individually.

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    MODERN FORMULATIONS; QUA REGULARITY The biting criticisms against the use of analogy disappear against modern formulations of the Teleological argument. The obvious weakness of using analogy, high-lighted by Hume, meant that there was no future in this as a starting point.

  2. Suffering in Religions of the World

    The question these two elements raise is whether suffering is deserved if man is given freewill?

  1. Why are tensions between science and religion so persistent? Why do rivalries between science ...

    Thus, over many generations, species would change by a process of evolution. Further, the process was said to work automatically, leaving little room for divine guidance or design. Reaction to the publication of The Origin of Species was immediate: scientific and religious authorities alike mounted attacks on the validity of

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Jung worked with patients suffering from schizophrenia led him to reject Freud's concept that neurosis was caused by repressed sexuality because although schizophrenia was a neurosis, it had no obvious sexual component and he concluded that schizophrenics lost of awareness was greater than a mere sexual component.

  1. How does Galileo view the issue of religion and science? How does he resolve ...

    The Bible teaches Christian to strive to live a life without sin and display the Kingdom with love. It does not answer questions related to scientific discoveries. We are supposed to use our own senses to interpret those observations and findings.

  2. Did God Create The World or was it Created by Chance?

    This is thought of as Abiogenesis which the process by which living organisms are created from non-living things. This is obviously not true because there are no living things on earth that have come from non-living things. Why does science not know where the birds and butterflies migrate to?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work