• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

God: a definition

Extracts from this document...


Nick Armitt 12 SHN God: a definition The name God has been applied to the Supreme Being who is variously understood in the many different religious traditions. Even within a single tradition, there is often great diversity of thought about God, which has resulted from changing conceptions of God's nature as they have evolved over the centuries. Taoism defines "god" as a permanent Tao, which is considered to be the essential unifying element of all that is. While Aristotle believes that God is the first cause of the world, or the "unmoved mover," Nietzsche believes that the very concept of God is "dead", that God no longer has the power, as it once did, to transform lives. Ms. Smith's position on God is similar to that of the Taoists in that she holds that there is one force, which is invested in everyone and in everything that is the Higher Being known as God. Taoism speaks of a permanent Tao in the way that some Western religions speak of God. The Tao is the rhythm of the universe or the "way" and acts as the Holy Being of Taoism. The Tao is considered unnamed and unknowable, the essential unifying element of all that is. Everything is basically one despite the appearance differences. Because all is one, matters of good and evil and of true and false, as well as differing opinions, can only arise when people lose sight of the oneness and think their private beliefs are absolutely true. ...read more.


"The chain of causation needs to be grounded in a first cause that it itself was not caused."(Acknill 204) Aristotle holds that there are in the world change, causality, degrees of excellence, and varieties of design. All of these together require a first cause, or a Prime Mover. Aristotle's treatment of the Prime Mover, or first cause, as pure intellect, perfect in unity, immutable and as he said, "the thought of all thoughts," is given in Metaphysics. In his Metaphysics, Aristotle argued for the existence of a divine being, described as the Prime Mover, who was responcible for the unity and purposefulness of nature. God is perfect and therefore the aspiration of all things in the world, because all things desire to share perfection. Other movers exist as well - the intelligent movers of the planets and stars. Aristotle puts forward the theory that there are 47 or 55 celestial spheres, each eternal, and for each of them there is an unmoved mover. The Prime Mover, or God, described by Aristotle is not very suitable for religious purposes, as many later philosophers and theologians have observed. Aristotle limited his "theology", however, to what he believed science requires and can establish. Aristotle's cosmological argument tells us that if we are to avoid infinite regress, we must suppose that this leads us to one or more prime movers that are themselves unmoved and that have the power to move by acting as objects of desire. ...read more.


Smith holds that life would live without God, but life would not be alive. God gives us the ability to breathe in the sweet fragrance of freshly cut grass and God is responsible for our love, our hate, our joy and our sadness. God adds complication to life by giving us happiness and to ensure we fully appreciate the good, God, our unified spirit, counteracts it with bad. Smith also takes on the Shakespearean mentality of "What's in a name?" She believes that whether God is called God, the Tao, Buddha, or Zeus, it still represents the same unified essence of all life. The word is simply a name and does not constrict this spirit, which Smith describes as being as vast and free and moving as the wind, to a specific religion or belief. She holds that all the different systems of faith are actually born of one great force, which has moved different groups into a diverse array of beliefs according to how this wind-like God as affected and been interpreted by them. All four philosophers and philosophies paint the portrait of God differently. This diversity leads to the conclusion that there is no direct knowledge of God based on Perception - seeing, hearing, and the other senses. Knowledge of God is based on intuition, deduction, or induction. This knowledge is a result of perception of the way the world itself is constituted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Arguments about god.

    I think it's fair to say the universe does need an explanation, and the answer to that explanation is God. From language in part 2 is it possible for humans to give a conclusive answer Due to the limitations of the written word and language cannot give a conclusive answer nor deal fully with the possibility of God.

  2. corporate religious experience such as the toronto blessing tell us nothing about god

    as he does not have to follow the dictates of human reason. Kierkegaard believed that God can do whatever He wants and the fact that it makes little sense requires that we must just accept with total blind faith. Using Kierkegaard you could argue that it requires Faith to accept

  1. God- The Great Geometer

    There were known to be five regular or "Platonic" solids, whose sides were regular polygons, as known to the ancient Greek mathematicians after the time of Pythagoras. Kepler thought that the two numbers were connected, that the reason there were only six planets was because there were only five regular

  2. Living In a Plural Society.

    Also they are expected to support the community of monks. Monks and nuns follow a path of moderate asceticism, including strict celibacy and the repudiation of all personal property. Buddhist religious leaders often are involved in education and charity and even take part in politics; other leaders separate themselves in their monasteries, contacting the public only to gain funds.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    that the universe has gradually been developing since a state of chaos. The selfish desire for the 'survival of the fittest' is also not present in the blissful Garden of Eden. The second assumption that each human was seminally present in Adam must be rejected on biological grounds, which means that we are no longer responsible for Adams sin.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    According to (L), being a universe cannot be exemplified unless being a FHP universe is co-exemplified. I believe, however, that we can concede even this objection consistently with the soundness of the atheological argument. To see this, we must reflect on the evidence adduced for the metaphysical necessity of natural laws.


    Ra provided that in the morning and his brother Horus did the same at night. Ra shines light in the faces of the followers of Osiris. He brought hope and meaning to their lives. Ra's light was the path to heaven or all that is good.

  2. "God is dead" - The Gay Science

    This is basically the economical division of labour and specialisation applied to religion, and would therefore be the more efficient belief method, as each God would be a knowledgeable expert in their field. Western religions, on the other hand, such as Islam, Christianity and Judaism strictly believe in the existence of a sole, almighty God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work