• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"'God is life' and 'God is love' are meaningless statements" Examine the reasons why some philosophers might agree with this statement.

Extracts from this document...


a) "'God is life' and 'God is love' are meaningless statements" Examine the reasons why some philosophers might agree with this statement. b) Explain and assess the claim that such statements as 'God is life' and 'God is love' have meaning for a believer. A plain factual statement is usually easy to understand for example; 'my dad is a man', this is easy to understand because the listener would know what a dad is because they have one as well, and they know what a man is, and it shows that my dad is alive at the time of me speaking about him. People, may however, argue about the concepts behind every word, for speaker and listener, but common sense tells us that the majority of people would know what is meant by this. However, religious concepts are not bound by these rules; there can be no such thing as 'a plain factual religious statement'. There are two philosophers in particular that wrote about religious language in relation to statements such as; 'God is life' and 'God is love', these are AJ Ayer and Anthony Flew. ...read more.


He is intangible, invisible, and elusive; we never see any evidence that he exists. Your gardener has been reduced bit by bit to nothing'. Flew claims that the same could be said for statements about God's existence, love or power. You can qualify the attributes of God down to nothing. He says religious language reveals that God's literal existence is not provable, literal in this sense means to do with the world. Therefore, some philosophers may agree with the statement "'God is life' and 'God is love' are meaningless statements", because such statements are neither analytical (correct by definition) or synthetic (provable by experiment or experience). Thus such statements are impossible to verify. On the other hand, some may argue that, taking Flew's conclusion to be correct; that religious language reveals that God's literal existence is not provable, to back up their argument because if God existed in a literal way then he would not be God. Religious statements such as the ones in question are accepted as being different from verifiable ones. One thing that makes them different is the different use of vocabulary in them. ...read more.


The fidelity of faithfulness is different from that of a good human being; the fidelity of a husband and wife to each other is not the same as the faithfulness of the guide dog to its owner. One assumes it is somehow on a higher plane. The same is true of God's goodness - it will be on a higher plane than ours, but we can appreciate it by analogy with our own lives. Wittgenstein made the same point, by using red; saying that red per se is ineffable. An idea of redness can only be illustrated by things that are red. The same is true for metaphysical, ethical and religious truths. Language cannot state something it can only show, or try to describe. Therefore, many believers may argue that such statements as the ones in question do have meaning for them, because they are not supposed to be taken in a literal sense. Believers in God; will realise that they are not supposed to be taken literally, unlike others who may not realise this. In the same way as metaphors and similes are used by religions to get their point across, but the problem with these are that some might not understand them. 1 AJ Ayer, Language Truth and Logic Thomas Taylor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    The experience leaves the person with a sense of the importance of the experience. Passivity; this is a sense of powerlessness in the face of the experience. People have spoken of a sense of being taken over by some ultimate divine.

  2. Arguments about god.

    God was the original cause according to the bible, St Thomas Aquinas and many Christians today. Question 4 - How has intelligent thought emerged, enabling us to ask these questions? This uncertainty demonstrates that we are able to think freely, whereas other creatures cant and where did this originate from?

  1. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    is a God of philosophers and not the God of Abraham and Isaac. This means that human reason creates a God in its own image, a God who is a cause amongst other causes, a designer amongst other designers and a perfect being amongst beings that Isaac perfection whereas the

  2. Can the Existence of God be proven?

    If there was a first cause which was not an event, then it was God and God exists. There are many problems with this argument. One is that the argument dismisses the concept of infinity. But it seems contradictory to accept and understand God's existence and not except or understand infinity as they are both equally incomprehensible.

  1. The Meaning of Life

    We would live forever so we would not have to worry about death and the fact that we would be forgotten. We could also achieve so much more in our life that would make us feel special and would add to the many little parts that make up the meaning of life.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    the contrary, could we have the instruction in that which is good." He continued to argue that if God took away evil, God would take away peoples humanity. For a human being entails having freedom; yet if God took away this freedom and intervened in each individual act is committed, there would be no freedom to commit evil.

  1. Is There Life After Death?

    Many of the biblical ideas are simply outdated. The earth is not the center of the universe. It is only on planet in a shadow of billions. There is also strong evidence to support the idea that human beings were not created suddenly, but evolved slowly over time.

  2. corporate religious experience such as the toronto blessing tell us nothing about god

    and howling and most off all uncontrollable "Holy laughter" and Glosslalia (speaking in tongues). Miraculous healing is also attributed to the Toronto blessing - people have claimed alleviation from various medical conditions such as back pain, stuttering and dyslexia etc.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work