• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How can we know if at all that our behaviour is ethical

Extracts from this document...


THIS DOCUMENT WAS DOWNLOADED FROM COURSEWORK.INFO - THE UK'S COURSEWORK DATABASE CLICK HERE TO VISIT COURSWORK.INFO HOW CAN WE KNOW IF AT ALL THAT OUR BEHAVIOUR IS ETHICAL? When was the last time you thought something like "I wonder if it was right on my part to do that"? "Did I do the right thing?" Most people ask themselves this question after having done something that when their actions putsactions put some pressure on their conscience. But before one carries out this type of action one makes a decision that is referred to as Often, people's actions are based upon an 'ethical judgement'. Many argue that ethics are rules of conduct that are deemed justifiable according toare determined by behavioural standardsrules set by cultures, religions and societies. However, But for example a murderer criminal wouldn't think "oh, I can't kill him, my society forbids it"; he/she makes a decision alone. It can Thereforetherefore be argued that our ethics are nothing but personal opinions that are influenced by religion, emotion and culture. So it is incorrect to say that one 'knows' that one's behaviour is ethical, one can only compare it to the opinion one has formed on the rightness/wrongness of the deed. The environment each individual grows up in is different. Different cultures, different religions, different societies. ...read more.


Thus we can see that in religion and society people belong to a group that have a shared code of behaviour which is considered ethical and this is what is used to know and distinguish ethical behaviour. However just because society or religion deems it so, are these codes of conduct actually ethical? Can anyone prove that they are ethical? Religious customs and beliefs are rooted in rational reasoning. However over time the practicality and the applicability to life have become more obscure as people's lifestyles have changed dramatically. Therefore religious "truth" it has moved from something rational, to a faith or a dogma.. Another way of knowing what is ethical is consequentialism. According to the internet encyclopaedia of philosophy, ""Consequentialism" refers to a class of normative moral theories which maintain that an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favourable than unfavourable." Furthermore, this theory can be divided into three components. * Ethical Egoism: an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable only to the agent performing the action. * Ethical Altruism: an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable to everyone except the agent. * Utilitarianism: an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable to everyone. ...read more.


"There is no universal principle or set of principles by which to judge the morality of an action. Instead each society or culture has its own set of moral rules..." (Henri-Claude de Bettingnies). I agree with this statement because, for example if one says that "that society treats children unethically" about a society that forces children into hard labour, one is in fact applying one's own standards another society which has different code of ethics. Some argue that there is a basic code of ethics that everyone must follow which distinguishes humans from animals. But who is one to say what the other society is doing is wrong, just because one's code of ethics is different? Thus ethics are relative. Thus we can see that one has an individual code of ethics that have been influenced by the society one lives in and often one's religion. These ethical judgements are also made based on emotions, consequentialism and reasoning. Thus each person uses this knowledge to determine if they are being ethical in their actions. Above all ethics are relative and one cannot judge the ethicality of the actions of individuals and societies that do not share the same ethical code. Hence I think it apt to end with the words of Henri Claude de Bettingnies; "Ethics cannot be reduced to some master list of rules applicable to everyone. There are no ethical principles that everyone should follow. There are only ethical principles that apply locally... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    implications for morality if there is no God, would be intensely stimulating for them.' Not only does religion teach us about values, it provides us with stimulating questions about major issues, which children should be able to discuss. Even if a religion is a minority interest these days, the great philosophical questions face every human being.

  2. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    it is very good to see debt cancellations, meaning that countries can get on with what is necessary to spend their money on, rather than paying back richer countries who do not particularly need the money.

  1. TOK Essay: Reason and Emotion

    A great example of a moral decision which was made and is still justified by emotions is something that occurred during the Football World Cup of Germany 2006. That World Cup featured one of the greatest players in the history of the game in their last professional tournament, his name, Zinedine Zidane.

  2. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    It could be argued that Aristotle believes that the virtue of justice is gained from the law as it can be gathered that a person without justice, does not live within the law. This is very similar to Plato, who would give a lot of weight to the purpose of the law.

  1. Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions ...

    Emotivists accept that moral judgements are dependent on one's attitudes, background and emotions, whereas Preciptivists regard ethical statements to have a universal quality as well as expressing an opinion. Moreover, in concurrence with Emotivists, Hare agreed that statements were subjective because moral truth and knowledge did not exist behind them.

  2. Explain how Meta-Ethics differs from Normative Ethics.

    All religious, superstitious and supernatural statements are considered meaningless. This philosophy was started by a group called the Vienna circle, and later came to be associated with A.J Ayer and the branch of philosophy called Emotivism. David Hume acknowledged that moral facts weren't like scientific ones, concluded that moral facts, weren't facts at all.

  1. Explain ethical egoism. Do you believe that it is true? Why or why not?

    another persons life, they may do so because everyone will admire them, or they would not be capable to live with themselves if that individual died, when they could have attempted to save them. In other words, an egotistic person can perform generous acts, but they cannot act compassionately.

  2. How can you or your society decide ethically which knowledge should or should not ...

    Then what is a society? What, or how much, does it contain? A society could be only the interaction between students in a school, or ants in an anthill. The key word is interaction. In earlier years, people didn't travel much.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work