• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How can you or your society decide ethically which knowledge should or should not be pursued?

Extracts from this document...


How can you or your society decide ethically which knowledge should or should not be pursued? I strongly believe that our society and myself do believe that research into areas of knowledge should not be stopped because of all the ethical complications. Once the knowledge is revealed society will be able to create laws and regulations to help contain it if necessary. One of the ethical complications is that there are to many perceptions and ideas of what the terms knowledge, society, and ethical mean. Knowledge according to the oxford dictionary 'is the awareness or familiarity gained by experience of a person, fact, or thing." An American philosopher, poet, and essay writer, Martin Fischer once said, "knowledge is a process of piling up facts; wisdom lies in their simplification." This helps support the argument that knowledge is to general to state what we should learn and what not. Ethical according to the Oxford dictionary means, 'relating to morals, especially as concerning human conduct.' Ethics are very different in the many variety of cultures that we have in our world today. Even then within countries the ethics can be different, ethics are not something general that someone can have or not. ...read more.


I believe that universal acceptance will be the most complicated problem of knowledge due to the fact that every human on this world is unique and has his/her's own personal opinion. A personal past example was when I was talking to my cousin's from Switzerland and they believe that learning about the First Native's in Canada is not as important as learning about European history. Personally I believe the same, since I have European background but then my Canadian friends believe that since the Canadians took the land from the Native people they are obliged to teach their future generations all about the First Natives. By saying this I incorporate history education and bias from Europe and Canada but also one can now see that it is very hard to agree universally on an issue because of factors such as bias and patriotism. Patriotic people always want to learn about their country's history first and than learn about others. I believe every country's history is important to learn about but, each to a certain extent. Another problem of knowledge comes with culture and religion. Each culture is unique and different; therefore all countries are different like with the human beings. ...read more.


A key issue still today and still a very sensitive issue is the holocaust that happened 50 years ago. Historians when analyzing this very horrible and sad issue must be very careful when talking about their discoveries in front of the current political environment, otherwise they can get into trouble for creating information and facts. I believe strongly that our society cannot decide ethically which knowledge should be pursued due to the fact of how vast and different everything on this world is. We cannot set certain universal ethical instructions because these instructions will never fit everybody's point of view on this world. Another belief of mine is that morals are relative, and change within societies and time. Therefore, I think that it would be useless to learn some certain ethics that will later change. Ethics when shown poorly and /or wrongly can be very dangerous and hurtful to someone's career. For example, if a person does not have the ethics, whether or not to know if killing someone is wrong, than this will hurt his life and reputation. I believe that certain ethics should be made universal such as, knowing that killing is wrong, and on the other hand that the rest of the ethics are for each individual country's. Word Count: 1399 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    Moral disagreements are not really disagreements at all. For example if two travellers are trying to reach a destination, and disagree about the route, the principle is decided on and agreed but the best course of action was disrupted. The other ingredient in a moral statement is the intention to influence the feelings of approval and disapproval of others.

  2. Euthanasia can never be justified

    They say that letting these people commit euthanasia would not only let them have what they want, but it would also free valuable resources to treat others who want to live. Although people argue that it is wrong for someone to have to suffer so, it's seen by most Christians

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    Plato would see justice as simply a product of the Good which is the main area of his study, where it therefore follows that ethics itself is related almost directly to the Good. Plato suggests that the form of the Good is what allows us to know things; it gives us the faculty to understand the intelligible world.

  2. I have raised myself to a state of affluence and some degree of reputation ...

    Integrity in Dealings between Man and Man, were of utmost Importance to the Felicity of Life" (575). One of his first dealings is with a man named Samuel Keimer, a printer in Philadelphia whom Franklin starts out working for, but through deceit and manipulation, manages to rise above him.

  1. How can you or your society decide ethically which knowledge should or should not ...

    History shows how mankind always comes to the ethical conflict, whether it is right or wrong to experiment with human bodies, or play God - and we learn from it. As the Italian critic, philosopher, historian and politician, Benedetto Croce once put it, "Historical judgement is not a variety of knowledge, it is knowledge itself..."

  2. How Successful is The Co-operative Banks Ethical policy?

    For this reason all areas of the ethical policy are voted for by the consumer. The main evidence of the banks ability to fulfil its aims comes from sanctions it has imposed to insure any company, funded by the bank, fits within its ethical policy.

  1. How can you or your society decide ethically which knowledge should or should not ...

    My relationships to Sal, Warwick and Tom all obligate me to maintain a relationship of benevolence, or at the least non-maleficence, so I feel morally compelled to protect them from the emotional harm that could ensue should events go awry.

  2. How can we know, if at all, that our behaviour is ethical?

    whereby it is argued that humans are all competitive beings who desire to gain an advantage over each other, so they are selfish and that human action is based on emotions rather than reason. The only way to judge whether our behaviour is ethical is through a set of contracts

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work