• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the claim that the Duke of Northumberland’s unscrupulous conduct as a ruler was necessary in order to solve the problems left by the Duke of Somerset? Give reasons and evidence.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree with the claim that the Duke of Northumberland's unscrupulous conduct as a ruler was necessary in order to solve the problems left by the Duke of Somerset? Give reasons and evidence. Historians have held differing views as to the roles of Somerset and Northumberland. Northumberland was traditionally portrayed as a ruthless ruler who was only out to get what he could for himself. However, a revisionist view of him has come about which portrays him as an efficient ruler who turned around England's government. This view would say that his unscrupulous conduct was entirely justified given the problems that the Duke of Somerset left England facing at the end of his rule. For example, Somerset left England in a very precarious position financially. The treasury was bankrupt, and the country was embroiled in two costly wars. It was plain that England could not carry on fighting these wars and gain financial stability, but Somerset had continued the wars because he was afraid of hurting the country's reputation and national pride. Northumberland had no such qualms, however. One of the first things he did when he came into power was to end the wars with Scotland and France. ...read more.

Middle

Bishops Ridley and Hooper were able to greatly strengthen Northumberland's religious grip on the country, but at the cost of a definite swing towards Calvinism. This was dangerous for England in more ways than one. Firstly, it could cause rebellions, especially in the North where Protestantism was not very popular. Kett's Rebellion and the Prayer Book Rebellion during Somerset's rule had been brought about because of displeasure over religious reforms. Fortunately for Northumberland though, there were no rebellions about his religious reforms, which included a new and even more Protestant prayer book. This was possibly due to fear over the way Northumberland had dealt with Kett's rebellion earlier. The second danger in adopting a more Calvinist outlook was that Northumberland risked displeasing Charles V, ruler of the Holy Roman Empire. Charles V was a staunch Catholic, and also the ruler of the most powerful country in Europe. He would be opposed to any country who was becoming more Protestant - and doubly so with England, because she had just adopted a neutral stance with France, who was almost constantly at war with the Empire. The question is whether Northumberland was justified in exposing England to these risks. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was very unscrupulous behaviour on the part of Northumberland - perverting the succession was akin to treason. Many would argue that this action was entirely unjustified, and Northumberland was acting in his own interests here rather than in the interests of the country. However, a case can still be made in his defence. Northumberland believed, correctly, that he was an extremely adept ruler. If Mary was to come to the throne, there was no guarantee that she would be able to keep the country in order, and there was the possibility of Northumberland's work going to waste. There was an even greater danger that Mary would try to convert the country back to Catholicism - this could lead to riots, which would damage the financial and social stability of the country. I can conclude then that Northumberland was justified in carrying on with his unscrupulous conduct, as he needed to correct the errors left by Somerset's government. Though he may have made losses in the short term, in the long term he was able to completely turn England around through his 'unscrupulous' methods. The only area in which he was not entirely justified was in trying to pervert the succession, but even then he had reasons which could be seen as legitimate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Non-violence is an effective answer to prejudice. Do you agree?

    Jesus has many quotes which support his view on non-violence such as "do to others as you would have them do to you" (Luke 6:31), which means you should treat other people how you want to be treated and "love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless

  2. Explore the idea that organisations fail when it comes to supporting domestic abuse survivors ...

    This booklet needs to be translated into different languages. It is the same problem with another leaflet entitled - Surviving Domestic Violence produced by Solihull Domestic Violence Forum. But a positive point about the Bharosa leaflet is that it is translated into several different languages, which allows Muslim women to

  1. The question is, what is happiness? And is technology being exported to benefit ...

    In certain African countries people struggle to find food and fresh water. We have supermarkets with fresh food and water and 10 flavors of peanut butter, but we take our largesse for granted. In a certain way we are still driven by the European myth that we'll reach salvation through an increase in production.

  2. "In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters ...

    J.P Satre said "Words are more powerful and treacherous than we think"3 One can agree that this claim is true when compared to the words that the leaders spoke before going to war.

  1. "Violence is an inappropriate response to racism." Do you agree?

    As awful as it is, it is one of the most common excuse I've heard, of course no one does deserve it, it's just an easy thing for people to say, to convert their wrong doing back to the racist.

  2. Stanley Cohen is an example of a sociologist who has conducted research in order ...

    In this instance the media created a self fulfilling prophecy which resulted in groups of young males identifying themselves with one of the two groups. The events the occurred subsequently were without doubt as a result of the original media interest and misreporting of the events at Claton-on-sea and other towns.

  1. There is a massive difference between rich nations and poorer ones, which grows larger ...

    It is because of these reasons that Christians feel it is their duty to help those who are poor or in need of aid. People who try and base there life around either the Bible or Jesus or anyone who try's to be a good Christian will learn that they need to be aware and help those in need.

  2. SOC102 Social Problems

    The first of the Matrimonial Causes Acts was introduced in 1878, through campaigning of early feminists such as Frances Power Cobbe, which aimed to control the amount of chastisement by the husband but still held it as legitimate (Dobash and Dobash 1992,p.156; Muncie and McLaughlin 2001,p.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work