• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the claim that the Duke of Northumberland’s unscrupulous conduct as a ruler was necessary in order to solve the problems left by the Duke of Somerset? Give reasons and evidence.

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree with the claim that the Duke of Northumberland's unscrupulous conduct as a ruler was necessary in order to solve the problems left by the Duke of Somerset? Give reasons and evidence. Historians have held differing views as to the roles of Somerset and Northumberland. Northumberland was traditionally portrayed as a ruthless ruler who was only out to get what he could for himself. However, a revisionist view of him has come about which portrays him as an efficient ruler who turned around England's government. This view would say that his unscrupulous conduct was entirely justified given the problems that the Duke of Somerset left England facing at the end of his rule. For example, Somerset left England in a very precarious position financially. The treasury was bankrupt, and the country was embroiled in two costly wars. It was plain that England could not carry on fighting these wars and gain financial stability, but Somerset had continued the wars because he was afraid of hurting the country's reputation and national pride. Northumberland had no such qualms, however. One of the first things he did when he came into power was to end the wars with Scotland and France. ...read more.


Bishops Ridley and Hooper were able to greatly strengthen Northumberland's religious grip on the country, but at the cost of a definite swing towards Calvinism. This was dangerous for England in more ways than one. Firstly, it could cause rebellions, especially in the North where Protestantism was not very popular. Kett's Rebellion and the Prayer Book Rebellion during Somerset's rule had been brought about because of displeasure over religious reforms. Fortunately for Northumberland though, there were no rebellions about his religious reforms, which included a new and even more Protestant prayer book. This was possibly due to fear over the way Northumberland had dealt with Kett's rebellion earlier. The second danger in adopting a more Calvinist outlook was that Northumberland risked displeasing Charles V, ruler of the Holy Roman Empire. Charles V was a staunch Catholic, and also the ruler of the most powerful country in Europe. He would be opposed to any country who was becoming more Protestant - and doubly so with England, because she had just adopted a neutral stance with France, who was almost constantly at war with the Empire. The question is whether Northumberland was justified in exposing England to these risks. ...read more.


This was very unscrupulous behaviour on the part of Northumberland - perverting the succession was akin to treason. Many would argue that this action was entirely unjustified, and Northumberland was acting in his own interests here rather than in the interests of the country. However, a case can still be made in his defence. Northumberland believed, correctly, that he was an extremely adept ruler. If Mary was to come to the throne, there was no guarantee that she would be able to keep the country in order, and there was the possibility of Northumberland's work going to waste. There was an even greater danger that Mary would try to convert the country back to Catholicism - this could lead to riots, which would damage the financial and social stability of the country. I can conclude then that Northumberland was justified in carrying on with his unscrupulous conduct, as he needed to correct the errors left by Somerset's government. Though he may have made losses in the short term, in the long term he was able to completely turn England around through his 'unscrupulous' methods. The only area in which he was not entirely justified was in trying to pervert the succession, but even then he had reasons which could be seen as legitimate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Stanley Cohen is an example of a sociologist who has conducted research in order ...

    These 'types of violence' included plays of films in which violence occurred in the context of close personal relationships; programmes in which violence was not necessary to the plot but 'thrown in for the sake of it' and when violence was seen to be in a 'good cause'.

  2. Explore the idea that organisations fail when it comes to supporting domestic abuse survivors ...

    This booklet needs to be translated into different languages. It is the same problem with another leaflet entitled - Surviving Domestic Violence produced by Solihull Domestic Violence Forum. But a positive point about the Bharosa leaflet is that it is translated into several different languages, which allows Muslim women to

  1. Non-violence is an effective answer to prejudice. Do you agree?

    those who curse you, pray for those who ill treat you," (Luke 6:27-28). Jesus also said "if someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also," (Matthew 6:39), which Ghandi later repeated. This shows that Ghandi wanted to emphasise his point by using quotes from different religions.

  2. The question is, what is happiness? And is technology being exported to benefit ...

    In certain African countries people struggle to find food and fresh water. We have supermarkets with fresh food and water and 10 flavors of peanut butter, but we take our largesse for granted. In a certain way we are still driven by the European myth that we'll reach salvation through an increase in production.

  1. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    Nonproliferation as mode to combat weapons of mass destruction proliferation and use differs from counterproliferation in that its purpose is to eliminate even the possibility of a hostile state or group ever obtaining weapons of mass destruction or knowledge of them.

  2. "In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters ...

    The outcomes to war were all present to everyone around the world. Everyone knew innocent people were going to die, but reluctantly, war went ahead. To a certain extent, how can we be sure that what Tony Blair said was the truth in itself?

  1. "Violence is an inappropriate response to racism." Do you agree?

    Another thing a lot of people say is that violence is the only way to solve things, which we know, is slippery The people being violent usually try to take the blame off themselves and make everyone believe that it was all the racists fault, but it isn't the racists fault that they are being violent.

  2. There is a massive difference between rich nations and poorer ones, which grows larger ...

    possessions and after Jesus' death they sold everything that wasn't essential and used the money to feed the poor. "They would sell their property and possessions, and distribute the money among all." (Acts 2:45). Many Christian leaders have been martyrs for the poor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work