• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does Swinburne's argument for the existence of God based on religious experience succeed in overcoming the challenges to it?

Extracts from this document...


How far does Swinburne's argument for the existence of God based on religious experience succeed in overcoming the challenges to it? A Religious experience it can be portrayed as a 'mental event' which is undergone by an individual and of which that person is aware. The experience can be unplanned or it may come about by intensive training and self discipline. It is a recognized fact that people may claim to have undergone a religious experience, or some form of experience which reveals God to them. In recent times, Swinburne has focused on religious experience as one of the key arguments for the existence of God. Swinburne's argument begins with a definition of what he believes a religious experience to be. He states 'to the subject to be an experience of God (either of his just being there, or doing or bringing about something) or of some supernatural being.' If we go ahead and accept this definition put forward by Swinburne we are accepting the involvement of such beings under the class of 'some other supernatural being.' After the definition, Swinburne's argument takes two routes, the principle of Credulity and the principle of Testimony. The principle of credulity states, 'What one perceives to be the case 'X', is probably the case unless there were challenges put forward to why 'X' could not be the case. ...read more.


For example, a person may go to the Niagara Falls, and realise what a beautiful place it actually is, then conclude that because of this view God has revealed himself by his creation. Thus, they have undergone a religious experience. Davies argument towards Swinburne's definition succeeds quite well as it obvious in Swinburne's definition that he has no mention of nature- mysticism. There have been many criticisms put forward about Swinburne's argument, however Swinburne was aware of this when he went on to develop the four key challenges. One of the four key challenges states that if the subject 'S' was unreliable then the experience would produce unreliable results for example the recipient was under the influence of drugs or alcohol. This can be countered by the argument put forward by William James. James recognised the fact that people may be under the influence of drugs and alcohol when undergoing a religious experience but saw no apparent problem with it. James states, 'The drunken consciousness is one bit of the mystic consciousness.' The second key challenge states 'the recipient did not have the ability to interpret the evidence.' this also can be countered by James. James feels that everyone has the capability to undergo a religious experience despite their ability. For example a person who might have a faulty mind could be seen to some, as a person who does not hold the ...read more.


For example, the ideas of Marx and Freud need to be proven in order for them to overcome Swinburne's argument. Marx and Freud would argue that it was not the case that an ultimate power has chosen to contact them when a person has claimed that they have had a relgious experience. However, if Marx and Freud could prove that the recipient did not have a religious experience and it was rather, the recipient reflecting their own needs as a human being, then Swinburne's argument would fail. But if they could not, then Swinburne's argument suceeds. Another main aspect I feel that strengthenes the argument put forward by Swinburne, is the fact if we were to prove that the recipient did not undergo the religious experience it is incredibly hard or even impossible. As we cannot simply 'check with God' to see if He was/was not present or involved in an alleged experience. Thus, strengthening Swinburne's argument and therefore overcoming the challenges put forward against it.Another main reason why I feel that Swinburne's argument is so successful at overcoming the challenges towards it is because with religious experiences is that cannot simply 'check with God' to see if He was/was not present or involved in an alleged experience. However, the definition put forward by Swinburne is not successful in proving the existence of God, as Davis suggests that Swinburne prevents the inclusion of aspects of nature-mysticism in our consideration of religious experience. Neesha Parmar 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Another argument concerning the non-religious aspect of morality was that if the conscience were the voice of God, one would at least expect it to be consistent, however this is far from the truth. Voices in the mind of Jack the Ripper led him to commit murders, apparently in the name of conscience.

  2. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    He also noted that it is possible that the experiences that he recorded could have been induced through the influence of drugs or alcohol. Referring back to the question, is religious experience all in the mind of the believer, William James argues that religious experiences cannot simply be discounted - no more then everyday ones can be.

  1. Can the Existence of God be proven?

    But Super Pegasus can't exist without the idea of Pegasus first. Also, another argument which I will look at in more detail later is that everything has a cause and is caused by something which is equal or greater than it.

  2. Does God Exist?

    Descartes tried to prove the necessary existence of God through this argument: 1.If there is a God it is a perfect being; 2. A perfect being possesses all possible perfections; 3. Existence is a perfection; 4. Therefore, God necessarily possesses the quality of existence.

  1. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    (FP), which undertakes to take account of the weaknesses of the VP and to strengthen its bases by modifying it. Read Flew's use of John Wisdom's parable of the gardener (in Hick, ed., p. 225) Flew claims that "sophisticated religious believers" are similar to the believer in the parable in that they do not admit that any conceivable event(s)

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    Commands are only as authoritative as is the one that commands them; a command of a ruler carries more authority than a command of a citizen. Moral commands, though, have ultimate authority; they are to be obeyed under all circumstances.

  1. Corporate religious experiences such as the Toronto blessing tell us nothing about god. Discuss

    church service would say that it has changed their lives, but many would claim that it did nothing special for them. Other experiences that have people so strongly that could make a conversion where they feel they have felt the truth from the divine- God, the result of the conversion

  2. corporate religious experience such as the toronto blessing tell us nothing about god

    Often people claimed to have had feeling of electricity or a powerful energy passing though their body and stagger about as if drunk or simply collapse to the floor - "slain in the spirit". Most commonly associated with the Toronto blessing are large numbers of people wailing, crying, yelping, barking,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work