• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How has the Welfare State tried to eliminate poverty and can it be successful?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How has the Welfare State tried to eliminate poverty and can it be successful? The welfare State is a system in which the state takes responsibility for the health and welfare of its citizens/subjects. The state uses benefits, free healthcare, free education and provide adequate living conditions to ensure that people's health and well being is looked after. One of the aims of the welfare state is to eliminate poverty, poverty can come in many different forms some worse then others. Absolute poverty is when someone's income doesn't cover the minimum provisions needed to maintain health; these people are below the poverty line. Relative poverty are those people that cannot afford items that most people consider normal to have, such as a TV; therefore they are excluded from normal activities. Environmental poverty is not so much about money; someone may be above the poverty line but live in a neighbourhood with poor shops and parks. There is no official poverty line in Britain and because there are many different definitions of poverty it makes it hard to measure. ...read more.

Middle

There had been 20 years of mass unemployment and no help was given to those in poverty. The measures introduced by the Liberal government were not proving successful. The environments and housing people had to live in were of poor condition and helped spread disease. The Labour government decided that no one should be allowed to live in poverty and the Welfare state should be for everybody. To get rid of disease everyone was to have proper healthcare so the National Health Service was introduce; this provided free healthcare for everyone. In 1948 a social security system came into action to rid want and poverty. This provided money for those that needed financial help and protection. To tackle ignorance the Butler Education Act (1994) was introduced to provide free secondary state education to all, in 1947 the leaving age was raised to 15. To remove squalor poor housing was got rid of and it was replaced with adequate state and private provision. ...read more.

Conclusion

It has also not succeeded in getting rid of relative poverty, as there are people who cannot afford things that others take for granted. The NHS has meant that there are fewer diseases and people live longer, however there are long waiting lists for treatment. Everyone has a chance to an education and the leaving age is 16 however there are still some youths that come out of school with no qualifications. The old slums from before the war have been demolished and in their place new housing has been put up, although some of these places are no nicer to live in. Unemployment is still high although the state does provide training and job opportunities. Looking at Britain today to eliminate poverty would be a very hard thing to do. To provide free services for everyone who needs it the taxes would have to be increased. Taxes are a very unpopular thing and parties usually promise to lower taxes so as to get more votes. Therefore spending on the Welfare state cannot be improved in this way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development essays

  1. The State of the World Today

    People killin', people dyin' Children hurt and you hear them cryin' Can you practice what you preach And would you turn the other cheek Father, Father, Father help us Send us some guidance from above 'Cause people got me, got me questionin' Where is the love...

  2. Wealth and Poverty

    In the bible, it says that everyone should help each other and so it should not matter if some people are rich and the others are poor. People should not be divided into wealth and poverty groups, this is because according to Christian teaching, people should not make to be wealth by money but by God's words.

  1. RE poverty

    Groups such as G8, the EU and the developed world should help those in need by helping stop the poverty cycle, along with the charities who rely on the goodwill of people from the developed world already, as the governments could do so much more.

  2. To What Extent Is the Welfare State Responsible For Creating a Culture of Dependency?

    This makes sense - where there is tremendous poverty, no one knows what the future holds. However, it also prevents them planning ahead and perhaps trying to break out of their poverty. Exclusion approaches The second set of explanations for poverty is based on the idea of exclusion - meaning

  1. The Relation Between Consumerism and Poverty

    "The new poor are excluded from the consumption-based norms of society and therefore suffer the shame, guilt and envy of their failure"4 Until the consumer society emerged, "the condition of poverty has meant direct jeopardy to physical survival- the threat of death from hunger...disease or the lack of shelter"5and in many parts of the world this is still the case.

  2. Wealth and Poverty.

    Luke 16:19-31 is a parable Jesus told called the Rich Man and Lazarus. It is about a rich man who has many possessions and a poor man named Lazarus. When they die Lazarus goes to heaven and the rich man goes to hell.

  1. This essay outlines, contrasts and critically discusses two definitions of poverty, namely absolute and ...

    The notion of absolute poverty was developed two centuries ago, to draw attention to the plight of the poor (Mack J, Lansley S, 1985). Absolute poverty is defined according to an absolute minimum standard and is based around the idea of subsistence - the basic conditions that must be met

  2. How effectively did the Liberals help children, the old and the unemployed?

    The unemployed were the next group to tackle, when there wasn't any work about no income was gained so if a person didn't have any income the government set up a benefit they got each week, it wasn't a lot not enough to support the family but a foundation to build on.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work