• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How has the Welfare State tried to eliminate poverty and can it be successful?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How has the Welfare State tried to eliminate poverty and can it be successful? The welfare State is a system in which the state takes responsibility for the health and welfare of its citizens/subjects. The state uses benefits, free healthcare, free education and provide adequate living conditions to ensure that people's health and well being is looked after. One of the aims of the welfare state is to eliminate poverty, poverty can come in many different forms some worse then others. Absolute poverty is when someone's income doesn't cover the minimum provisions needed to maintain health; these people are below the poverty line. Relative poverty are those people that cannot afford items that most people consider normal to have, such as a TV; therefore they are excluded from normal activities. Environmental poverty is not so much about money; someone may be above the poverty line but live in a neighbourhood with poor shops and parks. There is no official poverty line in Britain and because there are many different definitions of poverty it makes it hard to measure. ...read more.

Middle

There had been 20 years of mass unemployment and no help was given to those in poverty. The measures introduced by the Liberal government were not proving successful. The environments and housing people had to live in were of poor condition and helped spread disease. The Labour government decided that no one should be allowed to live in poverty and the Welfare state should be for everybody. To get rid of disease everyone was to have proper healthcare so the National Health Service was introduce; this provided free healthcare for everyone. In 1948 a social security system came into action to rid want and poverty. This provided money for those that needed financial help and protection. To tackle ignorance the Butler Education Act (1994) was introduced to provide free secondary state education to all, in 1947 the leaving age was raised to 15. To remove squalor poor housing was got rid of and it was replaced with adequate state and private provision. ...read more.

Conclusion

It has also not succeeded in getting rid of relative poverty, as there are people who cannot afford things that others take for granted. The NHS has meant that there are fewer diseases and people live longer, however there are long waiting lists for treatment. Everyone has a chance to an education and the leaving age is 16 however there are still some youths that come out of school with no qualifications. The old slums from before the war have been demolished and in their place new housing has been put up, although some of these places are no nicer to live in. Unemployment is still high although the state does provide training and job opportunities. Looking at Britain today to eliminate poverty would be a very hard thing to do. To provide free services for everyone who needs it the taxes would have to be increased. Taxes are a very unpopular thing and parties usually promise to lower taxes so as to get more votes. Therefore spending on the Welfare state cannot be improved in this way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development essays

  1. Explain the terms 'Relative poverty', 'Absolute Poverty' and 'Culture of Poverty'.

    3. Discuss the reasons why poverty in Britain is so difficult to measure. Subjectively how one feels, either poor or not poor can depend on many factors. Others might say they are poor when objectively there not. Some feel poor and some feel wealthy.

  2. To What Extent Is the Welfare State Responsible For Creating a Culture of Dependency?

    This makes sense - where there is tremendous poverty, no one knows what the future holds. However, it also prevents them planning ahead and perhaps trying to break out of their poverty. Exclusion approaches The second set of explanations for poverty is based on the idea of exclusion - meaning

  1. The Relation Between Consumerism and Poverty

    mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society"8 This underclass is measured by wellbeing, teenage pregnancy, high truancy, drug addiction, crime and drug addiction. Bauman has of late cast doubt on this assumption that there is an underclass with 'nonstandard values.

  2. RE poverty

    This is normally sent as actual goods, such as blankets, tents etc. instead of money, as they can be utilized faster. But CAFOD needs money to help buy these things, and here Catholics can help by raising awareness, making personal donations or helping fundraise themselves.

  1. Sociology of Poverty in Britain

    However, researchers face many problems in attempting to measure relative poverty. Pichaud criticizes Towensend's index commenting that it is unclear what items such as eating fresh meat have to do with poverty or how they are selected. In this respect, the measurement of relative poverty appears to be as invalid as Rowntree's early work employing absolute definitions.

  2. Absolute and Relative Poverty

    In the North many people are worrying about if they are eating healthy diets, but in the South 35,000 people are dieing of starvation every day. This counts up to a person dieing around every minute. The reasons for this absolute poverty are because the people who are trapped have

  1. Singer's Practical Ethics: Poverty

    He notes, "If a consequence of my spending money on a luxury item is that someone dies, I am responsible for that death. It is true that the person would have died even if I had never existed...the fact is that I do exist" (226).

  2. The State of the World Today

    aren't doing anything to alleviate this poverty and hence are just as bad. Yo', whatever happened to the values of humanity Whatever happened to the fairness in equality Instead in spreading love we spreading animosity Lack of understanding, leading lives away from unity...

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work