• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How might a moral relativist respond to the claim that people should always tell the truth?

Extracts from this document...


How might a moral relativist respond to the claim that people should always tell the truth? When the word "moral" is looked up in a dictionary, it gives the following definition - concerned with right or wrong conduct, a moral lesson or principle, a person's moral habits. Moral relativism is along the same lines, as moral relativism is the theory that morality, or standards of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore become a matter of individual choice. You decide what's right for you, and I'll decide what's right for me. Moral relativism says, "It's true for me, if I believe it." Moral relativism is strongly linked and related to meta-ethics. Meta-ethics has produced a large number of different theories that have helped to find and understand the meaning and function of ethical terms like 'good' and 'bad'. These are very usefully classified under three general headings: 1) Ethical Naturalism; 2) Intuitionism; and 3 Emotivism. The ethical naturalism theory teaches that all ethical statements can be translated into non-ethical ones. ...read more.


This definition makes the question, 'I know a banana is a fruit, but is it yellow?' pointless because the first part of the sentence has already supplied the answer to the question. It is what G E Moore calls a 'closed question'. Moore concludes that that a definition is correct when the question asked is closed and incorrect when the question is open. Asking an open question, in other words, means that the two expressions being used do not mean the same thing. Therefore, G E Moore is teaching ethical non-naturalism / intuitionism. Ethical non-naturalism is G E Moore's own moral theory. If ethical language can ever be reduced to factual statements, then it can never be regarded as true or false on the basis of observable evidence. Does this mean that ethical statements can never be considered true or false? Moore denies this. We do process another method of verification, in which we decide whether an ethical proposition is true or false through a process of moral intuition. ...read more.


I live in a world of children where "truth" is what we recall instinctively. So, if I am being threatened I say what I think I need to say to remove the threat. If I am asked if I believe in Father Christmas - I do, because I know no different from what my parents told me. So, I think I always tell the truth. Last year I asked my Dad if Mum was dying, he said no. But she did. Last year I asked my Dad if my Mum was dying, he said yes. And she did. In summary, a Moral relativist would answer in the context of his or her own culture and experience. I think that there is more to life than just truth and a Moral relativist would have to think about the context of the question as much as the definition of truth. So, I think the answer would be "it depends". Strengths - there is a lot of support for a point of view from the society because judgements reflect the values of the community. Weaknesses, a corrupt society could lead to corrupt values, which may ultimately not be sustainable in the wider world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Discuss whether moral judgements are subjective or objective

    Emotivism is a subjective approach which believes that moral judgements are simply a matter of taste. A.J Ayer is the main person which we associate with this view. In the same way as it would be considered alright for a person to express their taste in music as different from another's.

  2. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    The consequences of ones actions are unpredictable, it is unfeasible to identify how our actions will be received by others and therefore this makes it difficult to determine which actions do and do not promote happiness. The strengths of the utilitarianism theory is that it provides a relatively easy formula for right and wrong.

  1. Television and Religion - Give your response to the view that television always presents ...

    She was very committed, enthusiastic, willing and always trying to share her views with relatives, friends and neighbours. Alex's character changed dramatically when he had a sexual relationship with a married woman.

  2. "Miller's plays show is that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises" ...

    That kind of thing always pays off". This shows the idea that Chris is aware that even though allowing Kate to "go on thinking that we [Joe and Chris] believe with her [that Larry is alive]" i.e. lying to Kate, may bring short term happiness in that she would not feel alone, however long term, Chris knows

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    Humans have been made existentialists, connected to God only through our existence, otherwise totally alone. A radical thought, but that is what view of the sanctity of life incurs. Anything the bible says can only be interpreted; this gives rise to very different views on the same things.

  2. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    The people have been there since birth and therefore do not question that what they can see may not be real. Behind them is a wall where people are carrying things, the flickering fire casts shadows onto the wall in front of them, and this is their reality.

  1. Discuss critically the claim that Freewill and Determinism are incompatible

    Thus, freewill does not exist. If you agree with this argument then you are taking the position of incompatibilism. Incompatibilism is the principle that determinism is incompatible with freewill. I agree with this principle, I find it almost impossible to believe that freewill can be determined; the two terms almost contradict each other.

  2. The Canterbury Tales: A Moral Reading.

    receive the cake made out of the flour they were cheated out of, and don't get injured in the fight like the Miller does. Despite this information, there is still a moral in the story, to not cheat others. This moral seems to over ride a moral of not coveting

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work