• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How might the death penalty prevent crime?

Extracts from this document...


The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the execution of criminals by the state for committing heinous crimes such as rape and murder. A major purpose of criminal punishment is to conclude future criminal conduct. Justice is about enforcing consequences for one's own actions to endorse personal responsibility. We cannot expect anyone to take responsibility for their own actions if these consequences are not enforced in full. It is believed that fear of death deters people from committing a crime, for example most criminals would think twice before committing murder if they knew that their actions could lead to the death penalty. Today, on the other hand, he who has committed murder can't be sentenced to death penalty and therefore he would probably neither be deterred from committing further crimes. McAdams, a professor of Political Science at Marquette University, points out what is most evident in the facts concerning the death penalty. The death penalty erases criminals from our world and therefore prevents them from committing more heinous crimes. Even if the death penalty does not show any evidence of reducing crime or murder, then at least one more criminal is removed from our society, reducing number of criminals who might commit crimes in future. ...read more.


Because it is essentially impossible for the society either to know or accurately estimate the proportion of capital murders for which executions have been carried out, it is most unlikely that the death penalty could deter even "deterrable" potential offenders. In all likelihood, only those executions receiving significant media coverage are likely to have any deterrent potential In other words, executions appear to deter crime only through their announcement, for example, if potential criminals do actually witness an execution (through media) in short time before their planned (or not) criminal activity, then they will be less eager to commit a homicide. I think that more important than public executions for the country that uses the death penalty is to consistently inform its citizens about what crimes could have the death penalty as a consequence. Beginning in the nine-year school, all students should receive information about legal practice and what crimes imply the death penalty and they should be given reasons for both the usage and resignation from using the death penalty. Such knowledge might prevent them from committing crimes they would commit if they didn't know the consequences of their activity. ...read more.


Some people can sometimes refer to countries that have abolished the death penalty without any increase of the frequency of murder, and come to the conclusion that the death penalty has no special deterrent effect. But supporters of the death penalty can refer to other countries that have abolished the death penalty and where the frequency of murder have risen, or point out countries with death penalty where the crime rate is very low (for example Singapore and Japan). From a scientific point of view neither is right. The movement of the crime rate curve is dependent upon hundreds of factors, not just one. Truly reliable conclusions cannot be drawn from statistics, curves and tables. The causal connection is too complex and the opportunities of interpretations are vast. In itself the death penalty is not something desired. But this awful punishment is forced by a sometimes ice-cold brutal reality. Each country is continuously forced to fight criminal behaviors in every possible way, sometimes it is impossible to avoid using the more desperate means of preventing crime. The death penalty should be viewed as one (and certainly not the most favored) instrument among many in the fight for a more righteous and better world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Death Penalty

    Some states have got the death penalty enforced whilst some others don't. I have made a graph to make it easy to analyse; As you can clearly see the death penalty looks as if it doesn't work because in Louisiana where they have the death penalty they have the highest rates of murders, thirteen a years.

  2. Should the death penalty be used lawfully in civilised society

    Derek Bentley was hanged at the age of 19 for a murder committed by a friend.

  1. Critically evaluate arguments for and against the death penalty.

    It is important to note, alongside these statistics, that only 14 percent of the nation's population is black14. The next point regarding alleged racial discrimination by abolitionists, is that although the percentage of white victims to black victims is split equally, 50% - 50%, in 82% of studies, the likelihood

  2. Death Penalty - Should it be abolished?

    They are forgetting about the thousands of victims who die ever year from the hands of these evil murderers. Unfortunately, the death penalty is used so rarely that it isn't as effective as it could be. In order to serve its purpose, it must be adjusted and made more effective.

  1. Examine at least 2 reasons for believing in life after death

    never dies and unlike the body carries on living. The type of soul's afterlife also depends on one's belief in God and in following his rules. This too falls under the same criticism, simply because majority of religious writings are viewed as mythical and it is hard to prove in what they state to be true.

  2. Death penalty.

    Since then over 120 prisoners were executed, several of whose cases left serious questions about the guilt of the executed person. Besides Texas, 37 other states include the death penalty in their system of justice. From those 38, 23 states, including Texas, also murder those who committed a crime while being a juvenile.

  1. Arguments against the death penalty

    However, this is not to say that the society, which inflicts death penalty, commits murder. Murder is an offensive act. Death penalty, however effective it may be and through whatever ignorance it may be resorted to, is strictly a defensive act.

  2. According to the affirmitive team, the death penalty is a contradiction of the constitution.

    So may I ask the affirmitive-"In the plan of your case outline, you stated the fact that you would abolish the 5th amendment. Does abolishing the right of a person to due process of law and protection from accusations, in other words "innocent until indicted by a grand jury" really accomplish your theories.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work