• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Plausible is Cultural Relativism

Extracts from this document...


How Plausible is Cultural Relativism? Cultural relativism associates any ethical truth to the moral precedence of a particular culture: there can be no right or wrong actions or behaviour; rather actions that either do or do not correlate with the moral code relative to a specified society. For instance, polygamy is morally acceptable in some Islamic societies but not in Christian culture. According to William Sumner, morality is simply 'socially approved habits'1 that are subjective in their nature but form moral guidelines for the relevant culture. Therefore, cultural relativism denies the existence of objective and universal moral truths in favour of an acceptance that nothing can be intrinsically wrong or right, and that any feelings of moral obligation are caused by our upbringing and cultural influences. As a result though, there are many criticisms of this meta-ethical attitude because it does appear that human morality is considerably more complex than simply a product of social precedents. A main supporter of cultural relativism is James Rachels in 'The Elements of Moral Philosophy.' He agreed with the idea that all different societies have different moral codes and each of these individual codes determines what is morally acceptable within that particular society: the Cultural Difference Argument. ...read more.


On the other hand though, Kant believed that "human beings are not capable of direct, unmediated knowledge of the world"5 and if this were the case, then any argument for an inbuilt moral awareness within humans is crushed. Rachels also implies that the moral code of any given society is infallible due to the absence of objective truths or standards. According to this view, if a culture allowed slavery again, people from different cultures would have no grounds to oppose it because they should respect cultural differences. However, whilst social tolerance is vital, it is also important to scrutinise moral codes of other cultures in order to improve morality among humans as a whole. Added to this though is the problem of ethnocentrism: a natural human bias which places "one's own group... [at the]...centre of everything."6 Therefore, to impartially scrutinise another culture is an almost impossible task, because we are unable to judge an act purely on its merits due to our subconscious, culturally influenced, moral ideas. The absence of any form of objective moral standards means that moral inferiority cannot exist, thus implying that Nazi ideologies are as morally acceptable as Buddhist beliefs. ...read more.


The theory interprets any act to be ultimately motivated by a desire to do what we want in order to make us feel good. However, one could argue that the satisfaction that comes from doing a morally good act is merely a bi-product as opposed to being the reason for carrying out the act. Nevertheless, psychological egoism is irrefutable because it is based on speculation. This, though, does not make it any more plausible. Overall, it is evident that the main question surrounding moral philosophy concerns what inspires us to do, or at least be aware of, 'goodness.' The argument of cultural relativism is strong because different cultures clearly do have different moral outlooks. However, it does seem to be a much too narrow and simplistic view to attribute all morality to cultural 'habits'. Whilst I would disagree with the existence of objective universal truths, we appear to have an intuitive awareness of what is good which "engages us to pay [regard] to the interests of mankind and society"9. Essentially therefore, cultural relativism is a plausible theory because the influences of society do have a role to play when we make moral decisions. However, the natural moral intuition within humans appears to be the most important factor in moral decisions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Natural Law and absolutism

    The natural law theory is an absolutist view on right and wrong. There are alternative ethical theories such as utilitarianism which is a more relativist view and takes consequences into account, as long as the greatest good for the greatest number of people is fulfilled.

  2. Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality.

    The danger in this is that disputes could never be settled, without basic moral guidelines societies would collapse.It could be said that moral codes existing within a culture is enough but this can lead to that group becoming insular and rejected by other groups or cause confrontations and wars.

  1. Discuss whether moral judgements are subjective or objective

    When we look at the action itself or the motive of the person performing the action we call this deontological eg Rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism was devised by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill who believed that moral actions are right or wrong depending on the consequence.

  2. RE crousework topic 9

    an orphan or even become a volunteer working for the charity in many disaster struck areas such as the Gaza Strip. They make regular appeals to the public to donate open heartedly to help their fellow Muslims suffering in the Muslim world.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    utilitarian William Shaw claimed that, although Utilitarianism would clearly dictate the above conclusion, a good utilitarian would still praise the wrongdoer for their charitable donation even though it is wrong. This is because punishing such a person would likely push them to no longer make any charitable contributions, so praising

  2. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    Aristotle used an example of the soul to show both what virtues are. The soul is composed of feelings, dispositions and habits. Aristotle negates that we are good or bad simply because of how we feel, nor because we possess the dispositions which enable us to have feelings.

  1. How might a moral relativist respond to the claim that people should always tell ...

    An important weakness of ethical naturalism is that there are so many objections to it. The most famous objection to ethical naturalism comes from G E Moore (1873-1958). In his book Principal Ethics, Moore argues that all forms of ethical naturalism, by seeking to define moral words like 'good',' bad'

  2. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    On the other hand, choosing to spend that money on unnecessary clothes and goods, whilst being aware of the Bengali child's situation, seems immoral. In the way we live our everyday lives, we are choosing the latter, and are thus seriously guilty of moral wrongdoing, according to Singer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work