• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Identify David Humes understanding of miracles.

Extracts from this document...


Identify David Humes understanding of miracles The philosopher David Hume has suggested that a miracle can be defined as 'A transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity or by the interposition of some invisible agent. This is a definition that has found general acceptance by philosophers today. In other words, according to Hume, a miracle is brought about when some 'invisible agent' affects the working of the universe. It is important to note that this 'invisible agent' does not inevitably point to an act of God, as this 'invisible agent' is not, according to Hume, necessarily the God of traditional theism. To clarify exactly what is meant by a 'transgression' in this context, Richard Swinburne has used Biblical examples such as water turning into wine. ...read more.


However, this is a view held more by a majority than a minority as most theists argue that God governs the world through natural laws. Hick argues that any apparent violation of a natural law can be explained through an exception to that law. In criticism of these, Swinburne shows that events can be unexpected enough in order to be considered violations of what we should normally expect to happen. Hume provides the traditional arguments that can be postulated against the existence of miracles. Hume argues that it is always more likely that the testimony of a miracle is incorrect and that any such testimony is generally unreliable. Hume believes that natural laws have been observed to function on an unaccountable number of occasions and therefore evidence for a miracle would have to outweigh all of this collated evidence for the natural law. ...read more.


Whether one considers the belief in miracles to be strong or otherwise is dependant upon prior beliefs. If one already believes in a God or Gods it would seem reasonable to attribute miracles to them given the properties such as omnipotence which they are said to hold. At this point one may consider the principle of Ockham's razor where a simple and expected cause is the likely explanation for a certain event, it is not justifiable to invent a more complex one, even if it is a possible alternative. For the believer, divine intervention may well be the likely explanation. However, for a non-religious believer the occurrence of miracles would not be considered likely given that the event could be attributed to a variety of alternative explanations. Given the empirical basis of these explanations it would be difficult to consider the case for the existence of miracles as a strong one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miracles section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miracles essays

  1. R.S. Coursework - miracles

    They would just say that the miracle stories are important for Luke. They help to explain the significance of Jesus. The miracles are therefore only theological meanings but not actual happenings. Other Christians would say that miracle is dependent on faith.

  2. Assess Hume's reasons for rejecting miracles

    Hume argues that a miracle is a breach of a law of nature. As I said earlier, he believes that the belief in miracles is not rational. He maintains that if you were a rational human being, you would not believe in miracles.

  1. Examine the arguments, which can be used to discredit belief in miracles - In ...

    An example of are the accounts of Jesus allowing the blind to see again in the Bible, yet the growth of science in recent years has suggested an argument that Jesus was simply moving the cataracts of the blind, to the corners of the eyes with his thumbs.


    That is not the universal definition of a miracle; it is only a portion of what people feel a miracle truly is. For a religious person a miracle does not need break any constants of nature. A miracle can be the most trivial of things that is being thought as a miraculous intervention by God by the believer.

  1. "Assess Hume's reasons for rejecting miracles."

    From this for Hume it would be reasonable to reject the claim of a miracle, as it would be contrary to human experience. Hume's conclusion is not that miracles do not happen. Rather his conclusion is that no evidence is sufficient to establish that a miracle has happened, that even


    They believe that there are no real miracles but events that can be better explained in scientific terms (the plagues, walking on water etc) or are simply fabricated. The German scholar Rudolf Bultmann took a similarly sceptical view of miracles and argued that the world view of the Bible was unacceptable in a modern, scientific age.

  1. David Hume and Miracles.

    Secondly, Hume thought that human nature was such that it tended to believe in the unusual, the paranormal or the downright unprovable. Equally, the emotions of surprise and wonder are particularly palatable to the human mind. Hence miracle stories are suspect.

  2. Miracles. Many people have different views on what a miracle really is. For ...

    While on the was to his house a messenger arrived from his house and told Jairus his daughter had died, however Jesus said to Jairus "Do not be afraid; only believe and she will be well." When he arrived at the house Jesus said to the mourners "Don't cry; the child is not dead-she is only sleeping."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work