• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Identify the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Identify the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument, and how do they outweigh the weaknesses? There are many strengths within the Cosmological Argument which have proven theories and ways to prove the existence of God. Many of these strengths have come from such scholars as; Copleston, Aquinas and Leibniz, all of which have put together major points to prove the existence of a non-contingent being. One of the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument is from Aquinas way I that was about motion. This would be a posteriori argument because you need to gather evidence from the world around you. Aquinas stated that "Whatever is put in motion, is put in motion by another", by this he is saying that nothing can be both mover and moved. ...read more.

Middle

Nevertheless if that were true then that would mean that matter was non-contingent and would mean we are all non-contingent however we are because everything has a beginning and an end. One criticism of the Cosmological Argument asks why cannot God not be the originator and now no longer exist? On the other hand Copleston replied with his "In Esse" theory that God has to be there for everything to exist. Without God we would not be here, because he is non-contingent being and outside of time he will always be there (whom created the universe). Like the example of a man counting back from infinity and not being able to find the man counting, it would be the same with finding God. If we looked so far into the future or in the past, not matter how far we looked God would always be there because he is a necessary being, created by himself and thus can not cease to exist. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand there must have been something in which created the matter, the matter could not have just appeared which leads on to the first cause theory. In conclusion there are many strengths which lead to the theory of a first cause. However the proof of God is yet from discovery. God is just presumed as a first cause, however it could be anything. God has just been placed at the top of the chain and made a first mover. There is a necessary being still, it does not necessarily have to be God. The strengths outweigh the weaknesses a lot in the theory about necessary beings, and that everything is contingent by the evidence which is around us, moreover the proof about God is not that evidentially correct. ?? ?? ?? ?? Nick Gibson Miss Newton Philosophy Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Present the strengths and weaknesses of Augustine's and Ireneaus' theodicy

    God required the willing communication from humans and that is why he did not create them perfectly to being with. By giving the humans a choice to have willing co-operation with God. It gave them the choice to either have their genuine freedom, or have the free will to turn to evil when ever they wanted to.

  2. What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God? ...

    "The third way is taken from possibility and necessity. We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, since they are found to be generated, and to be corrupted, and consequently, it is possible for them to be and not to be.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Owen and Cardinal Newman are just two of the philosophers who have argued that morality stems from God either through our conscience or an objective set of rules he has built into us. The former is argued by Owen, who argues that the existence of objective moral laws seems to

  2. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    Wood cannot be hot to begin with as it would not change and become hot. The fact that it is wood is its actuality and the fact that fire can make it hot is its potentiality. Each change is therefore the result of an earlier change.

  1. What are the main theological concerns within the Book of Deuteronomy?

    At this point it may be worthwhile to note that Deuteronomy, in the face of the myriad of rival polytheistic sects and cults within the vicinity, developed a rather harsh attitude towards those who were attracted to such cults (12:2; 13:1-5, 6-10; 12:12-18 etc.)7.

  2. What are the main strengths and weaknesses of teleological argument for the existence of ...

    Therefore without god we would not have heaven or earth. The concept of cause and effect means that one cannot have the effect without the efficient cause. This brings another item into being or causes something to change. The idea is that there can't simply be a continuous weakening of

  1. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    In the first part of his argument he used the simple analogy of a watch. He stated that if a person found a watch in a field they would conclude that its parts had been created for a purpose. So, just as he believes that a watch had been created

  2. What are they key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    for a specific purpose. Many philosophers have contributed to the design argument with their own understanding of it and their own ways of explaining it. Perhaps the most well known among them is William Paley. Paley offered us an analogy to try to explain the argument.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work