• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Identify the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Identify the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument, and how do they outweigh the weaknesses? There are many strengths within the Cosmological Argument which have proven theories and ways to prove the existence of God. Many of these strengths have come from such scholars as; Copleston, Aquinas and Leibniz, all of which have put together major points to prove the existence of a non-contingent being. One of the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument is from Aquinas way I that was about motion. This would be a posteriori argument because you need to gather evidence from the world around you. Aquinas stated that "Whatever is put in motion, is put in motion by another", by this he is saying that nothing can be both mover and moved. ...read more.

Middle

Nevertheless if that were true then that would mean that matter was non-contingent and would mean we are all non-contingent however we are because everything has a beginning and an end. One criticism of the Cosmological Argument asks why cannot God not be the originator and now no longer exist? On the other hand Copleston replied with his "In Esse" theory that God has to be there for everything to exist. Without God we would not be here, because he is non-contingent being and outside of time he will always be there (whom created the universe). Like the example of a man counting back from infinity and not being able to find the man counting, it would be the same with finding God. If we looked so far into the future or in the past, not matter how far we looked God would always be there because he is a necessary being, created by himself and thus can not cease to exist. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand there must have been something in which created the matter, the matter could not have just appeared which leads on to the first cause theory. In conclusion there are many strengths which lead to the theory of a first cause. However the proof of God is yet from discovery. God is just presumed as a first cause, however it could be anything. God has just been placed at the top of the chain and made a first mover. There is a necessary being still, it does not necessarily have to be God. The strengths outweigh the weaknesses a lot in the theory about necessary beings, and that everything is contingent by the evidence which is around us, moreover the proof about God is not that evidentially correct. ?? ?? ?? ?? Nick Gibson Miss Newton Philosophy Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    This makes sense as an event only occurs if earlier events have taken place as in the example of fire and wood. Aquinas concludes that the first movement was brought about by a first mover and therefore this was God.

  2. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    These laws, Swinburne says, could not have come about by chance and it is more probable that it is designed, and if it is a design then the simplest explanation is God. The argument for providence is the argument that the laws provide the conditions suitable for life.

  1. Outline the key strengths and weaknesses of the teleological argument.

    A criticism of this is the Epicurean Hypothesis, which states that originally the universe consisted of particles in random motion and state. Throughout time natural forces have evolved into an ordered system. As the universe is eternal it is inevitable this would eventually happen.

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    principle of inertia in terms of the body's own previous motion without appeal to any other agent. His basic point was that there doesn't have to be an engine, there could be some other motion. David Hume asked why must we conclude that the universe had to have a beginning.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Dawkins has also recently written books to support Darwin's theory arguing that natural selection has given the illusion of design, and this has led to the mistake of the assumption that a designer was present. He rejects the design argument, arguing that the world was instead caused by random variations in the DNA molecules of any life form.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    = 4*pi*(density of matter) The Friedmann solutions tell us that if there is matter evenly distributed throughout the universe, then the universe must be expanding at a decreasing rate or contracting at an increasing rate (except at the instant, if any, at which the expansion stops and changes to a contraction).

  1. Present the strengths and weaknesses of Augustine's and Ireneaus' theodicy

    God did not want evil he wanted humans and angels to enjoy the world the way that he created it to be. Evil is said to have come from the off spring of Adam, who was the first human on earth.

  2. What are they key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    for a specific purpose. Many philosophers have contributed to the design argument with their own understanding of it and their own ways of explaining it. Perhaps the most well known among them is William Paley. Paley offered us an analogy to try to explain the argument.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work