• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In life, there are many cases, in which we have to kill some people in order to save many others from dying. But, is it really justified? There are people who think that it is justifiable if there are no other solutions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Journal Entry 6: Is it justified to kill some people in order to save others? In life, there are many cases, in which we have to kill some people in order to save many others from dying. But, is it really justified? There are people who think that it is justifiable if there are no other solutions. However, there are people who think that killing is downright wrong no matter what. The second type of people follows closely to a set of laws/rules and thinks that killing is immoral; therefore we should not kill even though that will save others. If killing anyone unjustly is wrong, then to kill regardless of numbers is wrong as well. The problem is now whether or not you could be justified in killing a few people to save many people. If you are justified in killing the few to save the many then it is not wrong and is fine; if you are not justified, then it is wrong to kill the few for the many. ...read more.

Middle

Would we kill someone about to poison the main water supply for millions of people? Would we kill a man trying to hijack a plane in intent to crash it, or kill a woman about to drive through a park full of children? If not, they will harm much more other innocent people! If this is the type of reasoning adopted, you would think that it is morally right to kill some people to save others, because killing by inaction is no better than killing by action. If you have to kill three people to prevent them from murdering a hundred, for example, that's very justified and proper police work, though it would be preferable to find a better solution. If it is not possible to save everybody in a fire, we will tend to choose the large group before the smaller one, because each life is precious, thus many precious lives are worth more than a few precious lives. ...read more.

Conclusion

Does he consider the people to be sacrificed less important in the society so it's not going to be a great loss, or considers them nobler and stronger so it will be their honour to sacrifice for the common good? If it is the first case, egalitarianism, humanism are out of question for the sake of practicality. If it is the second case, then we talk about the so-called heroes. But still we have the problem of the morality or the immorality of his choice. What if the leader was deciding instead of sacrificing anyone else, but to sacrifice himself and his own family? Or what if he would be blindfolded and he would pick randomly from the crowd? Would those two cases be ethical? Thus it can be said that killing to save others is justified in certain cases, but not in other cases. This is a very controversial question that many ask themselves, but till today, not many people are able to come up with a whole answer as to whether or not it is justified. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Stanley Cohen is an example of a sociologist who has conducted research in order ...

    These 'types of violence' included plays of films in which violence occurred in the context of close personal relationships; programmes in which violence was not necessary to the plot but 'thrown in for the sake of it' and when violence was seen to be in a 'good cause'.

  2. Israel and palestine is it justified?

    Firstly, take an example like Jerusalem. Currently under the control of Israel, people from the West Bank (i.e. Palestinians) are required to have ID, Permits and other documents to enter the city, whereas Israelis go through the checkpoints without any hindrance.

  1. "King Billy" by Edwin Morgan is a poem about the life and death of ...

    The only reason for using the word "unironic" here is to emphasis that they saw nothing wrong with being pious and religious about a man who was violent and used religion as an excuse for that violence. Morgan ends the poem by asking us to stop and think.

  2. Nelson Mandela, "Little more than a terrorist" or "An abused leader of his people"?

    The government would see this as propaganda and evidence Mandela that he was a terrorist because he was trying to stir up trouble appealing to Mandela's own audience. There is also evidence in Source F that Mandela is a terrorist.

  1. "In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters ...

    One cannot be in another country and perceives that Saddam Hussein did have weapons of mass destruction. The only way, in which one can believe that weapons were present, was by going and looking for themselves. To append to this, Tony Blair still sent his troops into Iraq for a war.

  2. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    Parenting Programmes A huge diversity of parenting programmes are available throughout the world, most programmes within Aotearoa New Zealand operate from a parenting skills development base rather than addressing parenting issues (Dalziel). Parenting programmes do not fit neatly into a primary, secondary or tertiary prevention model as they vary considerably

  1. Considering creatures by the name of Hard Cases, we are to assume that their ...

    The deontological theory is false. The issue that we are examining pertains to the internalist deontologist and his objector. Internalism is a stance in which we are justified in believing a proposition; the factors that make our belief justified are internal ones that are accessible to us through reflection.

  2. I'm going to talk to you about football. Don't you all think that it's ...

    The countries with the least amount of violence were Greece, the Czech Republic, Albania and Turkey. They were put in group five. From this information it is very clear that England has major issues with violence at football matches. Seeing as the problem first started in Britain and spread around

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work