• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters through which one perceives the world" Discuss and evaluate this claim.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters through which one perceives the world." Discuss and evaluate this claim. The use of filters in human life's deals with every possible aspect for a human to comprehend every situation that occurs. Filters are used naturally as part of the human persona. Filters can be delivered in any genre, and using these filters, is something that comes naturally to any person. It allows humans to realise what is happening, and allows the person to understand the situation according to their likings. Furthermore, to some extent, the use of these filters is instant. For humans to understand a common problem, the primer filters are the eyes and the ears. One can sue the eyes to see something that takes place, and furthermore, one can manipulate this vision, and say that something else has been seen. The same applies to the ears. The ears can hear something, but then in reality, something else can be said, which is totally different to what was heard in the first place. A prime situation that shows filters and how they are applied in real time was the issue about Saddam Hussein and if he had weapons of mass destruction. ...read more.

Middle

A few words, saying that Britain and America were going to fight in Iraq, instantaneously meant that many lives were to be destroyed for the Iraqi people, and the soldiers that were going to fight. Even if Saddam Hussein did not have any weapons, the amount of times that the leaders said that he did have them, could have made them believe something that was not true. The majority of Britain, and people around the world were insisting that was should not take place, but still, it did take place. This may have been because the leaders believed in the fact that weapons were present so much that it could have shown a psychological effect, which forced them to carry out such actions. Alongside themselves, the powerful leaders made millions of people go alongside them. Furthermore, what we were told in Britain was this same story told in Iraq? Could it mean that the truth depends on the language that it is told in? It can be said that this is true, because if Tony Blair said in English to the people in Iraq that their leaders was corrupt, and had weapons of mass destruction, many Iraqi people would not believe t. ...read more.

Conclusion

Emotions can also be tired into perception. When a person tells another person about something, about something that they feel strongly about, many people would agree that when you are telling something about something that you feel or believe, you are also showing your emotions. For a person to understand a situation fully, and react to it, filters are more defiantly required to help a person to unsolve a problem. Filters help us to do this by breaking down what is going on, which makes it easier for us to understand the problem. For example, if you go back to the prime filters, the eyes and the ears, an analogy could be implied, which can help a person to understand how filters break down something, and make it easier for someone to understand. Lets say, two people are talking, we know that they are talking because we can hear them talking. Furthermore, we also know that that two people are present because we can look at them. Filters break down the problem, and then each filter will understand the situation differently to another filter, and at the end, everything that is understood is put together, to make one final account of what happened. 1 Mohammed Aldouri, Ambassador to U.S 2 Tony Blair, British Prime Minister 3 J.P Satre Moheen Hassan I.B TOK 0568 025 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. In life, there are many cases, in which we have to kill some people ...

    A train is stuck on a cliff, enough of it hangs on the dangerous side of the cliff, and the other big portion is on the safe side. You can cut away the piece that hangs down, killing all people in it, but saving many others that will otherwise die,

  2. Analysis of speech extract: Tony Blair

    The only significant concrete nouns here are "terrorist groups" and "weapons". "Weapons" is a common, concrete, plural, neuter gender noun. The word "key", is a concrete, common, singular, neuter gender noun; and here, is only used here as a metaphor.

  1. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    However the disadvantages of war are not only threat from Iraq in retaliation but the UN will be affected greatly. If the US and UK are to go to war with Iraq using brute force, they will be going against the UN.

  2. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    In comparison to pacifism, violence seems wasteful; of human life and resources, wealth and intelligence. Indiscriminate, as in history it was only done by men, whereas everyone can take part. It is unjust and the innocent suffer. Violence is destructive, it sets up vicious cycles and spirals of violence.

  1. How far do you agree with the claim that the Duke of Northumberland’s unscrupulous ...

    He later returned the currency to its original silver content - this pleased all those who had been unhappy when he had continued Somerset's policy of debasing the coinage. Here, Northumberland shows again that he is willing to sacrifice things in the short term to achieve his long-term goals.

  2. Free essay

    Christian Perspectives

    It is known as The Fall of Man. God created human beings to look after the world and rule above other creatures; the fish, the birds, livestock and all of the creatures on the ground. God created humans in his own image.

  1. What does Christianity teach about human responsibility for the world?

    He said he did not come to be served but to serve. Therefore if the Christian models his or her life on Jesus, it will involve entering into other people's worlds. Jesus was moved with compassion by the sight of needy human beings and Christians follow this example.

  2. Mahatma Gandhi said, "We must become the change we want to see in the ...

    In later stage, the victim would use that anger to apply violence on others. Even if we change individually, the tank is still adding gas to the fire. No one is willing to change in unison.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work