• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In regards to the problems of knowledge in the case of euthanasia how can we determine if we are acting in a good or moral way when there is a clear clash of ethical viewpoints?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In regards to the problems of knowledge in the case of euthanasia how can we determine if we are acting in a good or moral way when there is a clear clash of ethical viewpoints? In relation to euthanasia the general consensus is split into two main groups: those in favour and those opposed. But the issue that makes euthanasia such a constant topic of debate is that both sides have the potential to present extremely clear and persuasive arguments in their favour. Those who support the practice of active euthanasia might argue that helping the terminally ill to bring about their own deaths, allowing them to determine the how and when, is not only humane, but also allows the person, who is simply "living to die," to maintain dignity by orchestrating their own end, thus letting them die at peace, rather than suffer to the end, perceiving themselves to be a burden and/or disgrace, to those they love. Those who are against active euthanasia would argue that by participating in the practice of active euthanasia, one is "playing God," or perhaps, even worse, that they are not acting out of mercy, but rather out of selfishness, attempting to lessen their own burden. ...read more.

Middle

Of course this all depends on the individual with the ideas they have. Religion is a highly emotive topic with regards to euthanasia. In Christianity there are different opinions, the Roman Catholic Church and the people devoted to this church will see the suggestion of euthanasia like almost committing an act of heresy. It is absolutely forbidden. Under the catholic religion it is taught that life or anything that is bestowed upon us by God is sacred and should be worshipped and not destroyed. Therefore people who experience an upbringing that is influenced by the Catholic Church are predisposed to oppose euthanasia. This is different to a person with an Islamic upbringing, the Moslems agree that is a person is artificially kept alive and have no hope of recovering have right to euthanasia. However they believe that it is Gods will to keep the individual in the state that they are in but God could at any time intervene and cure the individual. Thus from a religious point of view the Moslem will trust God and will not intervene with his work. The Jews are more open to the topic of euthanasia, however the Jewish community has concluded that euthanasia cannot be an option because according to their God life cannot be shortened. ...read more.

Conclusion

If they are no longer able to make this decision it is up to the relatives to decide one the matter, but how can they make a well-informed decision, their opinion will be biased based on different perceptions on the situation. The Doctor will help in the decision but he himself will have a hidden agenda behind the advice he gives to the people involved. There can still be no conclusion to a question, whether Euthanasia should be accepted or not. Psychologists, philosophers, doctors and everybody else, will consider this question for all time. One could argue that anyone who is terminally ill should have the choice, but to all rules there are exceptions, and to something as serious as this, there shouldn't be. In the end it all comes down to the individual making up his or her mind about this heated topic. It is thanks to free will that people are able to do so and that the individuals are able to choose to follow the opinion of their surrounding or if they will oppose to it. The arguments are there to persuade one, but personally one has to choose which side of the argument is more valid to the individual. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    As an experienced doctor, Dr. Emerson can explain that from a doctor's point of view, which is very professional, Ken is mentally unbalanced, and cannot make a decision of such seriousness and finality. "I ought to warn you Dr. Emerson is likely to take steps to have you admitted here as a person needing treatment under the Mental Health Act of 1959."

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    The only disadvantage of this method is that the person may feel slightly conscious that I am recoding everything that they say which could make them nervous and therefore not give their whole opinion. From this information I have decided that a Dictaphone is the most valid method for my

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    The second part of the position is Destiny. If God is the author of life then it follows that He is the one who determines when it should end. Thus in all ordinary circumstances it is not up to the individual whether he or she might add or subtract from his or her life.

  2. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    person suffering from a severe illness, for which no relief is known, should be entitled by law to the mercy of the painless death, if and only if, that is their expressed wish.' 'Doctors should be allowed to help incurable patients to die peacefully at their own request.

  1. What is meant by euthanasia?

    It is stressed that we do need to accept the reality of death and to prepare ourselves for it. It tries to draw a clear distinction between letting death occur when any further treatment is futile, when it is of no use to the patient and directly causing death by act or omission.

  2. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    Life has special dignity and worth. Human life is a "trust" and not a personal "possession" over which we have full control. No one can claim total mastery over one's own life or another's life. Every innocent human being is absolutely equal to all others. This equality is the basis of all authentic social relationships and

  1. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    UK where people are travelling to Australia and Switzerland for voluntary euthanasia yet they have not been considered as terminally ill or in a vegetative state. Chapter Six The Slippery Slope and the Living Will Legalisation of any sort of voluntary euthanasia would lead to a series of changes in logic and practice resulting in both non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia.

  2. One of the main reasons behind the euthanasia ethical debate is the difference between ...

    to receive euthanasia so as to end their suffering (Reasons for Euthanasia 2012). By receiving euthanasia, patients who are in extreme amounts of pain and who are terminally ill do not have to stay alive when they are suffering. Another argument for euthanasia states that people should not be forced

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work