• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In regards to the problems of knowledge in the case of euthanasia how can we determine if we are acting in a good or moral way when there is a clear clash of ethical viewpoints?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In regards to the problems of knowledge in the case of euthanasia how can we determine if we are acting in a good or moral way when there is a clear clash of ethical viewpoints? In relation to euthanasia the general consensus is split into two main groups: those in favour and those opposed. But the issue that makes euthanasia such a constant topic of debate is that both sides have the potential to present extremely clear and persuasive arguments in their favour. Those who support the practice of active euthanasia might argue that helping the terminally ill to bring about their own deaths, allowing them to determine the how and when, is not only humane, but also allows the person, who is simply "living to die," to maintain dignity by orchestrating their own end, thus letting them die at peace, rather than suffer to the end, perceiving themselves to be a burden and/or disgrace, to those they love. Those who are against active euthanasia would argue that by participating in the practice of active euthanasia, one is "playing God," or perhaps, even worse, that they are not acting out of mercy, but rather out of selfishness, attempting to lessen their own burden. ...read more.

Middle

Of course this all depends on the individual with the ideas they have. Religion is a highly emotive topic with regards to euthanasia. In Christianity there are different opinions, the Roman Catholic Church and the people devoted to this church will see the suggestion of euthanasia like almost committing an act of heresy. It is absolutely forbidden. Under the catholic religion it is taught that life or anything that is bestowed upon us by God is sacred and should be worshipped and not destroyed. Therefore people who experience an upbringing that is influenced by the Catholic Church are predisposed to oppose euthanasia. This is different to a person with an Islamic upbringing, the Moslems agree that is a person is artificially kept alive and have no hope of recovering have right to euthanasia. However they believe that it is Gods will to keep the individual in the state that they are in but God could at any time intervene and cure the individual. Thus from a religious point of view the Moslem will trust God and will not intervene with his work. The Jews are more open to the topic of euthanasia, however the Jewish community has concluded that euthanasia cannot be an option because according to their God life cannot be shortened. ...read more.

Conclusion

If they are no longer able to make this decision it is up to the relatives to decide one the matter, but how can they make a well-informed decision, their opinion will be biased based on different perceptions on the situation. The Doctor will help in the decision but he himself will have a hidden agenda behind the advice he gives to the people involved. There can still be no conclusion to a question, whether Euthanasia should be accepted or not. Psychologists, philosophers, doctors and everybody else, will consider this question for all time. One could argue that anyone who is terminally ill should have the choice, but to all rules there are exceptions, and to something as serious as this, there shouldn't be. In the end it all comes down to the individual making up his or her mind about this heated topic. It is thanks to free will that people are able to do so and that the individuals are able to choose to follow the opinion of their surrounding or if they will oppose to it. The arguments are there to persuade one, but personally one has to choose which side of the argument is more valid to the individual. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Secondary Research. The newspapers that I used were mainly the Guardian and the Independent. I found these papers were both very useful and I was able to use them to my advantage as they both had up-to-date accurate information concerning Euthanasia. They also gave both sides of the arguments.

  2. Euthanasia -Humane or insane?

    If people could make the decision themselves then I believe that the option of euthanasia should be open to them. Some people might also want euthanasia because the drugs they require to ease the pain are very expensive and are not available on the NHS, so rather than see their assets diminish, they would rather slip away.

  1. Can Euthanasia be justified?

    None of the religious people who took the survey thought that the government should make laws about creating a timeline on use of facilities, whereas 50% of the non-religious people said that laws should be put into place. * Is there any moral difference between killing someone and letting them die?

  2. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    On the other hand, friends and relatives may want the patient to live for as long as possible. They may also consider death to be a morally wrong action under any circumstances. 'Situation ethics' therefore is well named, as the morally right action depends on the situation.

  1. What is meant by euthanasia?

    It highlights some of the changes that have occurred since the last report issued in 1975 and it also reaffirms some of the most important principles e.g. * Human life is a gift of God to be preserved and nourished....

  2. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    During Mr Hill's conversation with Dr. Emerson, Mr Hill says, "I begin to see why he thought it necessary to be represented." Mr Hill means that without his help Ken would never win a battle between himself and Dr. Emerson. As Dr. Emerson's views on Ken being discharged from the hospital were just too strongly against the matter.

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    Social contract theories have many starting points, which offer different accounts of taking and preserving life. One of these is Egoism. Thomas Hobbes said, "Survival is prior to pain/pleasure or concern for others. Survival is the right to preserve one's own life at all costs" killing, stealing and adultery are all legitimate means.

  2. Evaluate the ethical argument for and against keeping a person alive against his or ...

    The Hebrew Scriptures forbid euthanasia and Christians hold that suffering is part of God's plan because Jesus suffered on the cross and so pain is just a way of life and something we all must endure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work