• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In regards to the problems of knowledge in the case of euthanasia how can we determine if we are acting in a good or moral way when there is a clear clash of ethical viewpoints?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In regards to the problems of knowledge in the case of euthanasia how can we determine if we are acting in a good or moral way when there is a clear clash of ethical viewpoints? In relation to euthanasia the general consensus is split into two main groups: those in favour and those opposed. But the issue that makes euthanasia such a constant topic of debate is that both sides have the potential to present extremely clear and persuasive arguments in their favour. Those who support the practice of active euthanasia might argue that helping the terminally ill to bring about their own deaths, allowing them to determine the how and when, is not only humane, but also allows the person, who is simply "living to die," to maintain dignity by orchestrating their own end, thus letting them die at peace, rather than suffer to the end, perceiving themselves to be a burden and/or disgrace, to those they love. Those who are against active euthanasia would argue that by participating in the practice of active euthanasia, one is "playing God," or perhaps, even worse, that they are not acting out of mercy, but rather out of selfishness, attempting to lessen their own burden. ...read more.

Middle

Of course this all depends on the individual with the ideas they have. Religion is a highly emotive topic with regards to euthanasia. In Christianity there are different opinions, the Roman Catholic Church and the people devoted to this church will see the suggestion of euthanasia like almost committing an act of heresy. It is absolutely forbidden. Under the catholic religion it is taught that life or anything that is bestowed upon us by God is sacred and should be worshipped and not destroyed. Therefore people who experience an upbringing that is influenced by the Catholic Church are predisposed to oppose euthanasia. This is different to a person with an Islamic upbringing, the Moslems agree that is a person is artificially kept alive and have no hope of recovering have right to euthanasia. However they believe that it is Gods will to keep the individual in the state that they are in but God could at any time intervene and cure the individual. Thus from a religious point of view the Moslem will trust God and will not intervene with his work. The Jews are more open to the topic of euthanasia, however the Jewish community has concluded that euthanasia cannot be an option because according to their God life cannot be shortened. ...read more.

Conclusion

If they are no longer able to make this decision it is up to the relatives to decide one the matter, but how can they make a well-informed decision, their opinion will be biased based on different perceptions on the situation. The Doctor will help in the decision but he himself will have a hidden agenda behind the advice he gives to the people involved. There can still be no conclusion to a question, whether Euthanasia should be accepted or not. Psychologists, philosophers, doctors and everybody else, will consider this question for all time. One could argue that anyone who is terminally ill should have the choice, but to all rules there are exceptions, and to something as serious as this, there shouldn't be. In the end it all comes down to the individual making up his or her mind about this heated topic. It is thanks to free will that people are able to do so and that the individuals are able to choose to follow the opinion of their surrounding or if they will oppose to it. The arguments are there to persuade one, but personally one has to choose which side of the argument is more valid to the individual. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Secondary Research. The newspapers that I used were mainly the Guardian and the Independent. I found these papers were both very useful and I was able to use them to my advantage as they both had up-to-date accurate information concerning Euthanasia. They also gave both sides of the arguments.

  2. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    is entirely physically stable and that Dr. Scott should now know that there is no reason for Ken to die. Dr. Emerson wants Dr. Scott to be on his side and see that there is no need for Ken to die, as the hospital has done everything it can to make Ken alive and well.

  1. Euthanasia -Humane or insane?

    What I'm trying to say that euthanasia is a permanent process it is irreversible and what's to say that within one to two years there wouldn't be a medical break through in the particular area they are suffering from or that there might be a new drug, which might ease the pain and make daily life worth living?

  2. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    On the other hand, friends and relatives may want the patient to live for as long as possible. They may also consider death to be a morally wrong action under any circumstances. 'Situation ethics' therefore is well named, as the morally right action depends on the situation.

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    The second part of the position is Destiny. If God is the author of life then it follows that He is the one who determines when it should end. Thus in all ordinary circumstances it is not up to the individual whether he or she might add or subtract from his or her life.

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    The Church of England thinks there should be a clear distinction between deliberate killing and the administration of painkilling drugs or withdrawal of treatment which will have the effect of shortening life. In 1975 the board for Social Responsibility produced a report called 'On Dying Well : An Anglican Contribution to the debate on Euthanasia'.

  1. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    Life has special dignity and worth. Human life is a "trust" and not a personal "possession" over which we have full control. No one can claim total mastery over one's own life or another's life. Every innocent human being is absolutely equal to all others. This equality is the basis of all authentic social relationships and

  2. Evaluate the ethical argument for and against keeping a person alive against his or ...

    The Hebrew Scriptures forbid euthanasia and Christians hold that suffering is part of God's plan because Jesus suffered on the cross and so pain is just a way of life and something we all must endure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work