• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'In the light of ethical theory, discuss arguments for and against pacifism.'

Extracts from this document...


'In the light of ethical theory, discuss arguments for and against pacifism.' Pacifism subscribes to the idea of peace being the best goal and they best means of achieving peace is always through peaceful methods. So pacifists reject the use if physical force, even in the defence, and maintain war is always wrong. When it comes to pacifism there are arguments both for and against its wide spread use. Arguments for include the teachings of Jesus, which show that he taught about love our neighbours as ourselves and that we should turn our cheek to violence against us. This is shown in Matthew 26:52 Jesus instructs Peter to drop his sword and not fight the Roman guard and says 'all who live by the sword, will die by the sword.' And again in Luke 6:7 where he instructed 'if someone strikes your cheek, turn to him the other also.' These show Jesus was very much a pacifist himself and as we are taught to follow Jesus example we should also adopt pacifist views. ...read more.


The second example is that of the Hindu, Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi who through peaceful methods fought to overcome British rule in India. Both these men however did lose their life. Arguments against it come from such people as Jeff McMahan, the Roman Catholic Church and the just war theory. Then there are the arguments against pacifism the first of these comes from Jeff McMahan who insists that pacifism is difficult to maintain. He believes this to be the case as it takes away the decision of a victim whether a violent response is just. Pacifism expects a person to stay non-violent in every situation. Which can be very difficult if you are faced with violence against you. So another problem which arises from this is that pacifism treats every situation as the same whereas in fact situations are very different and unique. The argument against pacifism put forward by the Roman Catholic Church. They say that it is your duty to try and stop sin or wickness if it arises using whatever means necessary to overcome it. ...read more.


However for it to be able to exist you need a society where every evil or conflict can overcome by using peaceful means. Seen, as we don't live in a society like that it would be very difficult to live by pacifisms principles, about the best means of achieving peace is always through peaceful methods, making conflict inevitable as it is the only way of dealing with many of the evils in today's society. So as it has been said "to secure peace, is to prepare for war". Also how realistic is it to be able to stay peaceful when you are faced violence either against you or you property. I know if I found my self in a situation where I was faced with violence I would feel that meeting violence with violence was justifiable. So basically I pacifism is a great idea but putting it into practice in the type of society we live in today just wouldn't we are faced with to many evils that wont be removed by peaceful means. Naomi Grundy ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Christian views on a just war.

    An issue closer to home regarding conflict and Christianity is the fighting in Northern Ireland regarding the Catholics and Protestants. The two communities are constantly at war with one another over their faiths and in doing so are abandoning the core values of their religions.

  2. Describe the teachings of Christianity about war and pacifism

    of the two other teachings, it condemns violence, it directly tells Peter, one of Jesus' disciples that he should not use violence, even in this context when it is to protect Jesus. On the other hand some of Jesus' actions that are written in the Bible completely contradict Jesus' teachings

  1. Domestic violence.

    A point worth consideration is that women at the highest risk of domestic violence are in the age range of 20 to 24 years so are therefore at the pinnacle age for pregnancy and childbirth. 9699564 Indicators of domestic violence in pregnancy are expansive and include the following -: 1.

  2. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    Further research is being undertaken to determine whether this and similar projects have a significant effect on the uptake of Protection Orders and Ministry of Justice approved programmes although anecdotal evidence suggests that participation in the Domestic Violence Centre programme quadruples the likelihood of children attending Ministry of Justice approved education programmes.

  1. Explore the idea that organisations fail when it comes to supporting domestic abuse survivors ...

    Although the personal significance of violence against men in relationships should not be devalued, Domestic Violence remains overwhelming a problem for women and can be usually seen as a direct product of the subordination of women both within marriage and within society as a whole.

  2. We live in a world of armed conflict - Explain what differing Christian beliefs ...

    Nor will they train for war anymore'. This shows that the wish of God is to have a world of peace and Micah interpreted his dream this way. When Jesus was betrayed by Judas, Peter attacked the slave of the High Priest cutting off his ear. Jesus rebuked 'All who take the sword die by the sword'.

  1. Explain the arguments put forward by Christians pacifists and demonstrate how Christian non-pacifists might ...

    On the anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks he described war as " at best the lesser evil" and added that attacking Saddam Hussein could bring "real cost to our own humanity." Christian pacifists say that violence is never acceptable and that it breaks the commandments for it says in the bible "Thou shall not kill."

  2. To what extent if at all might a religious ethic be pacifist?

    Genesis is perceived as the 'greatest possible being of which nothing greater can be conceived', he is the one rule giver and no-one is beyond his ruling. Society therefore has no place to decide which wars are suitable to fight and which are not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work