• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways have design arguments needed to be modified in the twentieth century?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In what ways have design arguments needed to be modified in the twentieth century? Of all the arguments for the existence of God, the design argument is considered to be the most popular, and convincing argument for this case. It is also known as the teleological argument1. As the name implies, the design argument is another sort of cosmological argument, as it bases its conclusions not so much on the fact that the universe exists, rather than that it exists in a particular way. It was founded by the classical philosopher Aristotle, and then developed upon by Anaxagoras, Aquinas and Paley. This was then met by criticisms from David Hume2, and later Darwin's theory of evolution seemed to have laid the argument to waste. But, in the twentieth century, Robert Dicke, Paul Davies, F.R.Tenant and Richard Swinburne all developed upon the earlier arguments of Aquinas and Paley to re-work the argument for the modern era. This though, was again met with a rebuff from Richard Dawkins and Peter Atkins. However, I believe that the crux of this essay stands on the multiplicity of circumstances, and at which point we can reasonably argue that God is the best explanation for this. For example, if I were to walk into my house, on my eighteenth birthday, and I looked in the garden, to see a boat. This is the exact boat that I have always wanted. It has my name on it, so can I safely assume, after this series of consequences, that this boat is mine? ...read more.

Middle

We may know something, just not everything. The sixth objection that Paley answered leads us to William of Ockham. He created Ockham's razor. This is a idea that, if we are presented with a situation or object with multiple possibilities, then we should simply go for the easiest explanation, as this is usually the right answer, so in this case, the principles on earth are there, that is something which we cannot deny, and the simplest explanation for this is God. As earlier stated, this early version of the design argument was criticised. David Hume mainly opposed the argument from design. In Dialogues concerning natural Religion he stated his main reasons for opposing the argument. He said that humans do not have sufficient knowledge and experience of the creation of the world to conclude that there is only one designer. Humans have only the experience of that which they have created. We cannot make the same assumption about the world, as it is based on limited experience. He then goes on to say that even if our ideas of design were valid, the design argument simply states that the universe was designed. The classic theistic God did not necessarily carry this out. It could have been a number of Gods, or an apprentice, who created this world, then went on to create bigger and better ones. He also says that there is no evidence to support the benevolent God of Theism. There is evil in this world, so that would suggest a designer who is not the omnipotent and omni benevolent theistic God. ...read more.

Conclusion

We need something therefore, beyond science. Swinburne says that God is the simplest explanation for the order, which produced mankind6 This again, of course faced criticism. The main opposition in the 20th century came from Richard Dawkins. He supported Darwin. In his works, The Selfish Gene, and The Blind Watchmaker7, he argues against the typical design arguments. He says that while natural selection gives the impression of design, which leads us to mistakenly believe there is a designer, in fact it is really all about preserving the best DNA. He says that we always search for a purpose, a "why?" to the universe. Post Darwin believers usually accept the how, but do not think that Darwin provides the why. Dawkins believes that science will answer both. He introduces the idea of reverse engineering. If we take something and look at it we should be able to analyse it to find its purpose. Dawkins uses this to say that, if there is a god, then why would he create a world like this? He uses the example of cheetahs and antelopes. Cheetahs are designed maximise deaths of antelopes. Antelopes however, are designed to survive, and starve cheetahs. It seems, Dawkins says, that two rival deities have designed them! 1 From the Greek word telos, meaning 'end' or 'goal' 2 David Hume Actually put forward his rebuff of Aquinas BEFORE Paley conceived of his argument. 3 A view of the evidences of Christianity - 1794 4 Natural Theology - 1802 5 1809-1882 6 An example of Ockham's Razor 7 Reference to Paley, if God were a watchmaker, then surely he is blind, as to create a world with such evil? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    part of our surroundings as any other entity and organism on this planet. We have grown into human beings over billions of years, stemming from the Earth just as all other life, and even inanimate entities, have. To believers of this order of events, man is given no special place,

  2. Golshani and Dawkins

    Perhaps the most significant anecdotal evidence in this regard is the phenomenon of young children spontaneously sharing what appear to be memories of past lives, a phenomenon which has been reported even in cultures that do not hold to a belief in reincarnation.

  1. An explanation and evaluation of the different perspectives on religion offered by Richard Dawkins ...

    McGrath agrees that the NOMA is not entirely possible, that Dawkins is right (if for the wrong reasons). Instead he suggests a middle ground, the POMA. An abbreviation of a partially-overlapping magesteria, the POMA evades Dawkins arguments by saying that in some areas science and religion may clash but that

  2. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    Charles Darwin is a philosopher who shows a different weakness in the design argument. In his book 'On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection' in 1859 he wrote about natural selection. He argued that a divine watchmaker is not the only possible explanation to how well plants and animals are well adapted to their functions.

  1. 'An analysis of arguments for the existence of God will result in valid philosophical ...

    But we can reject the three sides if we reject the concept of a triangle, and this holds true with a necessary being as well. If we reject Gods' existence, we reject all His predicates too, thus avoiding a contradiction.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Freud can contest Kant's apparent objective duty. Freud saw the conscience as being the product of the unconscious mind or the super ego. The super ego continues the work of the parents in limiting a person's behaviour. It develops in accordance with the conditioning received by a growing human being.

  1. What place is there for the Design Argument in the 21st Century?

    Thomas Aquinas supported the Teleological Argument, as this is the fourth way of his Five Ways. He argued that the world established obvious traces of an intelligent designer. He said that the natural processes and objects seemed to adjust with certain aims in mind and to say that they have a purpose.

  2. The Teleological Argument.

    Another argument placed forward by Hume is the 'like cause and like effect' argument. Hume also says that like effects should have like causes, therefore God would be like a superhuman figure - very anthropomorphic. He would have to be anthropomorphic because in order to create the human race, you would have to be 'super human.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work