• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways may modern ideas about evolution conflict with the biblical concept of creation?

Extracts from this document...


Claire Fricker In what ways may modern ideas about evolution conflict with the biblical concept of creation? Creation and evolution come from two very different viewpoints. The main differences here are that in the story of creation in the beginning there was God, and in the theory of evolution in the beginning there was random chance. The conflict between the two is often referred to as "The Great Debate" because everyone asks the question "why are we here and how are we here?" they can either look to the bible or science for answers. They are completely unlike answers to one another but both agree on one thing - that the universe has not existed eternally. There are problems with the bible story of creation in the way that we cannot prove or do any tests to show that there is a God or a creator, and as we cannot see, touch, or hear God then the only evidence to go by is the account of creation in the Bible. Scientists, however, claim that they can prove there was an actual scientific reason for the beginning of earth and show evidence through the big bang idea. Evolution is the theory of the origin of the universe, including the solar system, earth, plant, animal life and man. It states that through the operation of the current relevant laws of physics, chemistry and biochemistry over a very long time span, life evolved out of matter through a long series of very small changes to its current state. ...read more.


William Paley, a philosopher in 1802, used analogy to compare a complicated and ordered universe with complicated and 'man-made' products (E.g. A watch). His argument rests on the idea that just as these 'man-made' products (in this case a watch), are the result of intelligent design so the universe must have been brought into existence by an intelligent designer who is God, (and in his analogy - the watchmaker). The design argument includes the Anthropic Principle, as thought by F.R.Tennant, and states that the exact conditions in the universe have come about to allow human life to develop and be sustained - and may include the theory of evolution by seeing God as the one who sets up 'necessary' structures in the universe within which life has the 'chance' to evolve. Biblical writers assume that the world exhibits order and design through the 'handiwork' of God - 'For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities - his eternal power and divine nature - have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse' (Romans 1:20). There are criticisms of this argument, however. If a God who created the universe purposefully for us to live, and, if as God is shown in the bible He is all loving and all powerful then why does He allow evil and suffering in the world. David Hume says that the world is imperfect, and why should we presume God has got it right? ...read more.


This article in The Herald attributes these differences to a divine creator, and concludes that the body is a very complex organism in which all its separate and different processes could only be credited to God, and his divine intelligence in creating life. Creation and evolution are opposing equally as both have roughly the same amount of evidence for and against them, and either evolution would have to have a new piece of evidence to convince creationists towards evolution, or creationism would require a supernatural occurrence, or miracle to convince evolutionists towards creation. I believe that it is possible that they can exist coherently but for some, the two seem entirely incompatible and will never be reconciled. It is difficult to see which one is more possible because both are based on faith. We could say that "Science is wrong" and if we are confronted with data science has provided that doesn't match our interpretation of the Bible we simply write it off by claiming science is surely wrong. We could also say that "the Bible is wrong" and that since the Bible is a book whose main value is in spiritual areas - faith and practice - it is not necessary to expect it to be completely accurate in practical areas e.g. Science. I believe that if the god of the Bible is true, then the same God must have created the laws of science, and therefore is guiding evolution. If both arguments are used together, then I think that there is a much stronger case to explain creation and start of the universe. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    The mechanism through which this theory of evolution worked is called natural selection; it is the belief that if an animal were to be born with a new trait or characteristic beneficial to survival, then it would thrive. As an animal with this new characteristic would have to devote less

  2. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    (The Blind Watchmaker, p.13) Theist, Richard Swinbuurne believes that Dawkins is misleading because he ignores a chief premise of the Argument from Design; whether or not there is a sense of purpose of our existence. For those who believe there is, Darwin has not provided an ultimate explanation one way

  1. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    So the cause of a chair is the carpenter, plus materials and tools. If the totality is no more than the aggregate, then once one has explained the existence of each item in the aggregate, there is no more to explain.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    But this response may miss the point of the objection, which is not that big bang cosmologists represent the singularity as unreal, but that the singularity is unreal, given reasonable principles for interpreting scientific theories. This is the position of William Lane Craig and Richard Swinburne.

  1. John Milton's Paradise Lost is an Epic biblical poem with 12 sections, the first ...

    Milton was a man in utter conflict In terms of religious beliefs, he was a devout Cristian and therefore, to him, there was no question of God's existence, beauty, benevolancy and goodness. Consquently, Satan was the personification of evil and the antithesis of moral good since Satan represents everything opposite to God.

  2. Bereshit, the first word in Genesis translates to "in a beginning"

    Firstly, according to Nahum M. Sarna, the word 'myth' is often "identified with fairy tale and associated with the imaginary and the fantastic"10, which is not the type of myth that either the Priestly or Yahwistic sources had intended.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    There are too many variations from individual to individual for the conscience to be considered the word of God that would not only be a mistaken law but a highly dangerous one. The same criticism can be applied to objective law.

  2. The Conflict between Religion and Science

    * The theory of evolution basically took God out of the equation for the creation of man. This was the foundation of the Christian belief. * Scientists claimed that 'religion had been disproved' and that the bible was shown to be 'untrue'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work