• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Iraq: A Focus Misdirected.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Iraq: A Focus Misdirected The attacks launched against the US on September 11, 2001 caused a downward spiral of events that continue to this day. In my opinion, the American decision to invade Iraq was not a wise strategy to deter terrorism in the world for several reasons. First of all, the history of U.S. / Iraqi relations is contradictory to the U.S. decision to invade Iraq. There are many well-known facts regarding Iraq, but there are also many assumptions that remain unconfirmed. Finally, such a decision was a poor one because the 9/11 attacks were neither planned nor carried out by Iraqis. Saddam Hussein took over control of Iraq in 1979, and one year later initiated the Iraq-Iran war that was to last eight years.1 In 1982, U.S. President Reagan removed Iraq from the American list of known terrorist countries. By 1983, the Americans were supplying various Middle-Eastern countries with weapons of mass destruction and the supplies to build such weapons. They had pledged to do whatever necessary to prevent Iraq from losing its war with Iran. ...read more.

Middle

willingly supplied the Iraqis with the weapons that allowed them to carry out such an invasion.3 Then there are the conjectures: Iraq may have chemical weapons, and they may be developing nuclear weapons. It seems rather hypocritical that a nation like the United States would accuse others of having such weapons when they themselves are quite possibly the world's most armed nation. Iraq doesn't even come a close second, yet they are the target of the U.S.'s attention. The American government required Iraq to allow unrestricted U.N. inspection. Through examination of past events, like those in Germany in the late 1940's4, it would be highly unlikely that the U.S. would willingly submit to the same requests they put upon Iraq. Finally, Iraq was in no way directly related to the terrorist attacks on the United States. The American government took advantage of the support of their people on the issue of terrorism. Because of their fear and insecurity, American citizens blindly supported the attack on Iraq even though it had nothing to do with terrorism. ...read more.

Conclusion

was not completely justified in their actions. Had they waited to gain additional world support and built a stronger case for an invasion, it would have justified military movement. If however, George Bush wished to eliminate terrorism, his efforts would have been better focused in Afghanistan, the home of those responsible for the tragedy on September 11, 2001. Other Noteworthy Sources: "Hussein, Saddam", Biography.com (c)1996-2003, A&E Television Networks 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.biography.com/search/article.isp?aid=9347918&search=Saddam+Hussein> "Top Ten Reasons Why the US Should Not Invade Iraq", GlobalExchange.org (c)2003-2017, Global Exchange 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/iraq/invadeIraq082702.html> Iraq: A Focus Misdirected Vanessa Versteeg December 16, 2003 Mr. R. Brine Global History 12 1 "Iraq Timeline" InfoPlease.com (c)2003 Family Education Network 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.infoplease.com/spot/iraqtimeline1.htm> 2 "Arming Iraq: A Chronology of U.S. Involvement" Infowars.com (c)2002-2003 Alex Jones, All Rights reserved 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.infowars.com/print/iraq/arming_iraq.htm> 3 "The Case Against War on Iraq" CommonDreams.org (c)2002 Globe Newspaper Company 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0819-01.htm> 4 "The Berlin Blockade" Viewpoints, Susan Aliphat et al. (c)1993 Prentice Hall Canada Inc., Scarborough, Ontario 7 Dec 2003 5 "Public Growing Tired of Being Misled on Facts in Iraq" RetroPoll.org 8 Dec 2003 <http://www.retropoll.org/press_release_poll03.htm> 6 "FAIR Notes Clark's Admission of Bush Lies Starting on 9-11" RetroPoll.org 8 Dec 2003 <http://www.retropoll.org/from_news.htm#bushlines> ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Nelson Mandela, &amp;quot;Little more than a terrorist&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;An abused leader of his people&amp;quot;?

    He was suspected by the government and they were looking for an excuse to get rid of him. Source E also seems to back up Mandela and prove that he is not a terrorist, the left hand image shows him in a suit and tie looking very business like.

  2. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    The problem with dismissing UN advice is that the UN with become considerably less influential, and will have less power over current affairs in the world. However, if the UK and US are correct in believing that Saddam has WMD then they would have made and accurate decision in discharging the UN's guidance.

  1. Ought The UK and The USA attack Iraq?

    US Federal Law also expressly prohibits the assassination of foreign leaders. Given these laws and precedents, any invasion of Iraq could result in US and UK leaders, as well as soldiers, facing trial. I believe that the US in particular has already gone too far in their war against Iraq.

  2. &amp;amp;#145;Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security&amp;amp;#146; (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    but there are chances when they may go wrong and cause fatal damage. There would also be more money to spend on the starving and homeless people. On the whole it cannot be said whether Christians agree or disagree on this matter because their views very immensely.

  1. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    Parenting Programmes A huge diversity of parenting programmes are available throughout the world, most programmes within Aotearoa New Zealand operate from a parenting skills development base rather than addressing parenting issues (Dalziel). Parenting programmes do not fit neatly into a primary, secondary or tertiary prevention model as they vary considerably

  2. Biological weapons

    We can also see that the use of biological weapon cannot protect yourself, I mean that if you start a biological attack, you can also be touched by it; and we could think that this danger would prevent some biological attacks because people would be afraid to put their own lives in danger to create massive damage on a population.

  1. Biological terrorism.

    Medication is limited and treatment is short. When infected with one of these agents, life expectancy becomes very short ("Plague..."). The thought of biological warfare started with the Romans using dead animals to poison the enemies water supply, but it was not until 1918 that the Japanese would form a special military unit dedicated to biological warfare.

  2. &amp;quot;Should America have gone to war against Iraq?&amp;quot;

    The war aims of the US were achieved as Kuwait was liberated from Iraq and peace settled into the Kuwaiti region. America started getting more curious on the disposal of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. In 1993, Iraq attempted to assassinate the former President George Bush in Kuwait.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work