• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Iraq: A Focus Misdirected.

Extracts from this document...


Iraq: A Focus Misdirected The attacks launched against the US on September 11, 2001 caused a downward spiral of events that continue to this day. In my opinion, the American decision to invade Iraq was not a wise strategy to deter terrorism in the world for several reasons. First of all, the history of U.S. / Iraqi relations is contradictory to the U.S. decision to invade Iraq. There are many well-known facts regarding Iraq, but there are also many assumptions that remain unconfirmed. Finally, such a decision was a poor one because the 9/11 attacks were neither planned nor carried out by Iraqis. Saddam Hussein took over control of Iraq in 1979, and one year later initiated the Iraq-Iran war that was to last eight years.1 In 1982, U.S. President Reagan removed Iraq from the American list of known terrorist countries. By 1983, the Americans were supplying various Middle-Eastern countries with weapons of mass destruction and the supplies to build such weapons. They had pledged to do whatever necessary to prevent Iraq from losing its war with Iran. ...read more.


willingly supplied the Iraqis with the weapons that allowed them to carry out such an invasion.3 Then there are the conjectures: Iraq may have chemical weapons, and they may be developing nuclear weapons. It seems rather hypocritical that a nation like the United States would accuse others of having such weapons when they themselves are quite possibly the world's most armed nation. Iraq doesn't even come a close second, yet they are the target of the U.S.'s attention. The American government required Iraq to allow unrestricted U.N. inspection. Through examination of past events, like those in Germany in the late 1940's4, it would be highly unlikely that the U.S. would willingly submit to the same requests they put upon Iraq. Finally, Iraq was in no way directly related to the terrorist attacks on the United States. The American government took advantage of the support of their people on the issue of terrorism. Because of their fear and insecurity, American citizens blindly supported the attack on Iraq even though it had nothing to do with terrorism. ...read more.


was not completely justified in their actions. Had they waited to gain additional world support and built a stronger case for an invasion, it would have justified military movement. If however, George Bush wished to eliminate terrorism, his efforts would have been better focused in Afghanistan, the home of those responsible for the tragedy on September 11, 2001. Other Noteworthy Sources: "Hussein, Saddam", Biography.com (c)1996-2003, A&E Television Networks 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.biography.com/search/article.isp?aid=9347918&search=Saddam+Hussein> "Top Ten Reasons Why the US Should Not Invade Iraq", GlobalExchange.org (c)2003-2017, Global Exchange 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/iraq/invadeIraq082702.html> Iraq: A Focus Misdirected Vanessa Versteeg December 16, 2003 Mr. R. Brine Global History 12 1 "Iraq Timeline" InfoPlease.com (c)2003 Family Education Network 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.infoplease.com/spot/iraqtimeline1.htm> 2 "Arming Iraq: A Chronology of U.S. Involvement" Infowars.com (c)2002-2003 Alex Jones, All Rights reserved 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.infowars.com/print/iraq/arming_iraq.htm> 3 "The Case Against War on Iraq" CommonDreams.org (c)2002 Globe Newspaper Company 7 Dec 2003 <http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0819-01.htm> 4 "The Berlin Blockade" Viewpoints, Susan Aliphat et al. (c)1993 Prentice Hall Canada Inc., Scarborough, Ontario 7 Dec 2003 5 "Public Growing Tired of Being Misled on Facts in Iraq" RetroPoll.org 8 Dec 2003 <http://www.retropoll.org/press_release_poll03.htm> 6 "FAIR Notes Clark's Admission of Bush Lies Starting on 9-11" RetroPoll.org 8 Dec 2003 <http://www.retropoll.org/from_news.htm#bushlines> ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. &amp;quot;Should America have gone to war against Iraq?&amp;quot;

    They call it the "war on terrorism". America wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussein's regime and restore Iraq to the people of Iraq. There were people who hated Saddam but were forced to respect him.

  2. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    The following table considers how these approaches to the prevention of family violence fit within the health promotion framework provided by the Ottawa Charter. Ottawa Charter Area for Action Family violence prevention activities Building healthy public policy * Government legislation and strategy; * Education of children and young people (school policies); * Universal screening (organisational policies).

  1. Nelson Mandela, &amp;quot;Little more than a terrorist&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;An abused leader of his people&amp;quot;?

    Although to some extent saying that he was working with the communists Mandela also excuses this to say that it was their only choice and they were given no other option. The NP saw the communists as a bad influence because of their ideas so Mandela would already be suspected

  2. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    Although the crisis ended peacefully, the United States did not escape unscathed as Americans began to question their safety and the idea of the being an untouchable nation no longer prevailed; the United States would constantly have to do be on the defensive and build greater political safeguards.

  1. We are in Iraq to liberate the oppressed population, and everyday the Iraqi people's ...

    You will be held for the duration of the conflict then released to your families. However, if you fight, you will die. In places such as Bas'ra our troops are ready, ready to fight, ready to liberate. In the oil fields of the west, our soldiers man oil wells.

  2. &amp;amp;#145;Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security&amp;amp;#146; (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    the use of nuclear weapons or the way in that the Arms Race works. So therefore there are Christians who believe in the use of nuclear weapons and others who disagree. I think that nuclear weapons are good as a threat and can be prevent against war in that way,

  1. Source based discussion on the events at Sharpville.

    Also in this picture we cannot see if the policemen are carrying any form of weapons. They seem to be empty handed as do the crowd but we cannot make sure. All in all we cannot be sure of the reliability of either of these photos but they are still useful and interesting to study.

  2. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    In addition during the Gulf War, Iraq possessed chemical and biological weapons but refused to use them, even when they were defeated in Kuwait and allied forces pushed over the Iraqi border. They didn't use them during any of the time period since the Gulf War.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work