Is faith purely emotional or is it possible to provide a rational justification for religious belief?

Authors Avatar

T.O.K.

Is faith purely emotional or is it possible to provide a rational justification for religious belief?

         

I would like to firstly substitute some of the words with simpler alternatives.  Hence, is faith/trust purely an expression of instinct/emotional or is it possible to provide justification on a logical basis/rational justification for religious belief/acceptance.

        On comparing the two stands of emotion and rationale it therefore becomes obvious that the two are most definitely opposites. Though I agree that at times the two may have similar responses their approach is different and so logic and instinct are certainly different as well.

Join now!

        For example;

The religious cleric may abstain from war because he claims God told him to do so.  Yet the atheist may also abstain on the grounds that war causes destruction of property and life as well as economic instability.

So clearly while both are abstaining from war, they are doing so for different reasons.

However, to look more closely at ‘faith’, we can consider it from a different standpoint.  People can have faith in their religion because of ‘evidence’ that they find.  For example,

The scientist boasted in 1999 on his discovery of the death of a white star. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay