• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is God timeless or eternal? The cosmological argument.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is God timeless or eternal? The cosmological argument. The fourth century philosopher, St Augustine made this statement concerning time: 'what is time? When no-one asks me I know. But when I am asked to explain it I can't.' Time is a human construction, the twenty four time zones were established in 1884 because of the innovation of the railway system. The calendar itself is also a human invention devised to coincide with the movements of the planets. The modern world seems to be obsessed with time and the immediate future and this has lost us the opportunity to reflect on the past. This, according to Paul Davies, is an important part of a person's character as memories and past experiences create personality. The human being's lifespan is totally inconsequential relative to the history of the universe and although we are insignificant on a cosmic scale a person's memories can shape their influences. ...read more.

Middle

Human beings are finite and are therefore bound up with potentiality for change. Everything that moves does so in temporality and spatiality and so only a finite being can develop and acquire more knowledge. However, we understand God to be omniscient and so he cannot have the potential to learn more. Aquinas uses this logic to conclude that God is timeless in that he exists outside of time as we understand it. This also suggests that God is immutable. This is because to move would require time and space and God lives outside of these. All matter and finite beings have the potential to move and improve and because God lives outside of time God must be completely unchanging and never anything but God. The cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument and is defined by Aquinas in three ways. ...read more.

Conclusion

A potential infinite exists if it is always possible to add one to a number, for example the days in the future as more events are constantly being added. The actual infinite is complete at all times. It is simply the biggest number possible so half of the number equals the number itself as both are the largest possible. This is illogical and hard to comprehend but is a set mathematical concept. The Kalam version of the cosmological argument is based on the concept of infinity. The past cannot be infinite because that would mean it was possible to constantly add another yesterday which would mean today would never arrive. The present does exist and so the past is not infinite. It must therefore have had a beginning and since nothing can cause itself it must have had a cause. This cause was God. Hannah Fleming L6E 14.10.03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Cosmological Argument

    It cannot apply to something that we have not experienced. Some philosophers argue that even if there was a first cause, there is no proof that this is God of classical theism. The first cause could be physical or natural.

  2. Does God Exist?

    This is because God is omnipotent and his existence doesn't rely upon anything else, he is unque unlike anty contingenmt items eg a perfect island. With everything else in the world-apart from God-their existence is reliant upon something else. However, God's existence is part of his essence.

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    He basically argued that everything is in motion, and this must eventually lead to a first mover who is uncaused. Therefore Plato came up with the conclusion of God, and defined God as the 'first cause' or the 'first mover'.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Supporters of the principle have compared nature to a machine and like all good machines it requires a designer. Kant argued that the design argument relied on the concept that there was design, regularity, order and purpose in the universe as a result of a designer, who imposed order on to everything.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    If the intersection occurs in the past, such that the spacetime paths emerge from the point of intersection and gradually curve away from each other, the point of intersection would appear to constitute the beginning of spacetime. This possibility leads to a discussion of the next relevant aspect of big bang cosmology.

  2. Examine the key features of the cosmological argument.

    Aquinas concluded that common sense observation tells us that no object creates itself. In other words some previous object had to create it. He believed that God was the uncaused first cause who begun the chain of existence for all things.

  1. What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God?

    The example he used was of fire making wood hot: - Wood has the potential to become hot, and it is fire that changes it to achieve that potential. For the wood to change, actuality (a state of being) is required, as if it wasn't the wood would have to

  2. How does Paul change his speeches according to his audience?

    They would understand that the first section of his speech was the Kerygma, and that he was using that as a base to say that he had God ion his side. This means that Paul will have to change his speech when he is preaching primarally to Gentiles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work