• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is God timeless or eternal? The cosmological argument.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is God timeless or eternal? The cosmological argument. The fourth century philosopher, St Augustine made this statement concerning time: 'what is time? When no-one asks me I know. But when I am asked to explain it I can't.' Time is a human construction, the twenty four time zones were established in 1884 because of the innovation of the railway system. The calendar itself is also a human invention devised to coincide with the movements of the planets. The modern world seems to be obsessed with time and the immediate future and this has lost us the opportunity to reflect on the past. This, according to Paul Davies, is an important part of a person's character as memories and past experiences create personality. The human being's lifespan is totally inconsequential relative to the history of the universe and although we are insignificant on a cosmic scale a person's memories can shape their influences. ...read more.

Middle

Human beings are finite and are therefore bound up with potentiality for change. Everything that moves does so in temporality and spatiality and so only a finite being can develop and acquire more knowledge. However, we understand God to be omniscient and so he cannot have the potential to learn more. Aquinas uses this logic to conclude that God is timeless in that he exists outside of time as we understand it. This also suggests that God is immutable. This is because to move would require time and space and God lives outside of these. All matter and finite beings have the potential to move and improve and because God lives outside of time God must be completely unchanging and never anything but God. The cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument and is defined by Aquinas in three ways. ...read more.

Conclusion

A potential infinite exists if it is always possible to add one to a number, for example the days in the future as more events are constantly being added. The actual infinite is complete at all times. It is simply the biggest number possible so half of the number equals the number itself as both are the largest possible. This is illogical and hard to comprehend but is a set mathematical concept. The Kalam version of the cosmological argument is based on the concept of infinity. The past cannot be infinite because that would mean it was possible to constantly add another yesterday which would mean today would never arrive. The present does exist and so the past is not infinite. It must therefore have had a beginning and since nothing can cause itself it must have had a cause. This cause was God. Hannah Fleming L6E 14.10.03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    The same is true of Trethowan and Owen. Even if objective moral law does exist, there are still no grounds for suggesting that God exists. Regarding Kant's argument that objective law is required because only God can ensure our goal is met, and it is illogical to aim for something outside of our reach.

  2. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    Thomas Aquinas based his '5 ways' on the studies of Greek philosophy; philosophers like Aristotle and Plato who also argued that motion and change are bought about by something external to the things they happen to. He used the details of change, causation, contingency, variation and purpose, and based to base his '5 ways' on.

  1. A) What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Therefore it is necessary to admit to a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name God" Aquinas rejects the idea of infinite regress as there can be no first cause in an infinite regress. The third way he describes God is by saying that God is necessary and he has the quality of aseity.

  2. Does God Exist?

    We know they are true independently of experience e.g. We do not need to check that all circle as are round because a circle cannot be anything else but round, it is tur by definition. In order to determine the soundness of the argument, we need to consider, not the probability of any evidence but the logical coherence of the argument.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    The first step is the introduction of the so-called 'Einstein equation,' which is the heart of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.8 Einstein's equation says, in simplified terms, that the geometry (curvature) of spacetime is determined by the distribution of mass and energy in spacetime.

  2. What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God?

    The example he used was of fire making wood hot: - Wood has the potential to become hot, and it is fire that changes it to achieve that potential. For the wood to change, actuality (a state of being) is required, as if it wasn't the wood would have to

  1. The Cosmological Argument

    Nothing is able to change without a force changing it. Aquinas calls this the unchanged changer, God. According to Aquinas, nothing would exist unless God had the power to change it. He created the universe as it is by continuously changing actus into potentia.

  2. Examine the key features of the cosmological argument.

    Also the argument is based on experience of the world, which all of us can find it easy to relate to and understand. His second way is - the uncaused causer. This follows a similar line of argument but replaces motion with cause.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work