• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is it possible to update the cosmological argument for the existence of god

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is it possible to update the Cosmological argument for the existence of God? The term cosmological comes from the Greek language, meaning 'world' or 'universe.' The argument is based on facts about the world. The topic of cosmology refers to the study of the universe. The cosmological argument begins with a general claim about the physical universe e.g. that some events have causes and that there must be a supernatural agent to somehow explain this fact. The argument seems to say that there cannot be an infinite series of causes, they have to stop somewhere. One scholar who supports this idea is St. Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas invented the 'five ways' by which he tried to demonstrate god's existence philosophically. Aquinas' third way was the most thoroughly examined of all his ways. This way was his argument from contingency and necessity. It states that some things are contingent, and if everything were contingent there would have been a time when there was nothing. Something now exists and not everything is contingent, so there must be a necessary thing, which gets its necessity from itself. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore the reason why there is something at all rather than nothing must come from outside the world. For a sufficient reason to account for such things there must be a being, which is able to create existence. Such a being must exist of itself because there is something rather than nothing. Therefore a necessary being exists, which we call god. Copleston formulated three key premises. In his first premise, Copleston claims that all things in the universe are 'might not have beens' in that they are dependent on something else for their existence. Nothing in the universe is non-dependent. Copleston's second premise moves from saying that everything in the universe is contingent to the claim that the universe as a whole is contingent. He says it would be possible to argue that the universe as a whole is necessary and that everything within the universe depends on the universe as a necessarily existent totality. Copleston's third premise argues that whatever the universe depends on has to be necessary and that whatever this is, is the same as the god of religious belief. ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps matter is coming into existence all the time. The Kalam argument depends on the universe having a beginning whether the big bang is true or not. If the big bang didn't happen then the second premise fails. Some philosophers argue that even if there was a first cause of the universe, there is no proof that this cause is God. The first cause could be anything. For example, David Hume argued that the first cause could be the material physical world rather than god. This is just as satisfactory an explanation as God. The success of the different versions of the Cosmological Argument depend on a willingness to ask the question, 'Why is there a universe?' If you simply accept that the universe is just there and does not need an explanation, or that it is explained by an infinite regress, then the Cosmological Argument fails. God must also be shown to be a simpler or better ultimate explanation than the brute fact of the existence of the universe. Lindsay Graham U63 1 St. Thomas Aquinas, Teacher's notes 2 The Puzzle of God, Peter Vardy, Chapter 8 3 The Puzzle of God, Peter Vardy, Chapter 8 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    boundless, and one thing wouldn't follow another so the wood would be hot without even being burnt.. This is impossible; therefore Aquinas assumed the world was finite. He did not accept a series of infinite movers either. As a result he said that there was a point at which the first movement occurred, bought about by a first mover.

  2. Describe the Christian cosmology and the Muslim cosmology.

    Some Christians, liberalists, say that the accounts in the Bible are not supposed to be interpreted literally as scientific or historical accounts of the how the universe was made. They were written thousands of years ago so they are stories could have been changed as they were passed down the generations.

  1. "If God made the world, then he must be absent without leave!" Write an ...

    If our planet were one hundred miles further away from the sun, we would die of the extreme cold that us, as humans, and other animals cannot possibly tolerate. Many people refuse to accept the above-mentioned facts to be 'coincidences.'

  2. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    Rush Rhees maintains this view. He says: "If you tried to explain to someone who had no idea of religion that there was a first cause, you could be arguing as follows: There must be a first cause, a Something - and this something is more powerful, whatever that means,

  1. Examine the key features of the cosmological argument for the existence of God St ...

    This backs the cosmological theory. This is added to by Ed Miller whose theory is that if the universe is infinite it has an infinite number of series of days, the end of an infinite series of days would never be reached therefore we would never reach today.

  2. Examine the key features of the Cosmological for the existence of God. For what ...

    This would be a logical impossibility. Aquinas rejected an infinite series of causes and believed that there must have been a first, uncaused, cause, to which 'everyone gives the name God'. The third way identified the contingency of matter in the universe. The world consists of contingent items. That is, items that could have existed differently.

  1. Science does not as yet have a full understanding of the universe. However, it ...

    However, genetic engineering may lead to the creation of such a perfect species that there may be no room for the weaker, more ordinary humans in the 'super-fit race' of the future. Ultimately one has to ask, when will it all end?

  2. Does God Exist?

    This is because God is omnipotent and his existence doesn't rely upon anything else, he is unque unlike anty contingenmt items eg a perfect island. With everything else in the world-apart from God-their existence is reliant upon something else. However, God's existence is part of his essence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work