• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there an ethical difference between actively killing someone and letting someone die?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Moral Dilemmas This moral dilemma poses the question as to whether there is an ethical difference between actively killing someone and letting someone die. Is it morally wrong to kill someone but acceptable to let someone die? An active action is the process by which someone deliberately and uncontrovertibly does something, fully knowing and intending what the consequences will be. A passive action is the process by which someone deliberately does not act, even after knowing what the consequences will be. In the former case, the developer is going to indisputably kill six protestors, in order to prevent any opposition (an active action as this developer is going to actually kill them). ...read more.


?Thou shalt not kill but needst not strive, officiously, to keep alive?, Arthur Hugh Clough (1819-1861). But some people think this distinction is nonsense, since killing someone is a deliberate act, and so is deciding not to save someone. In active killing, a person is required to take an action with the intention that it will cause the death. In passive killing, a person lets someone die. However, this person is required to carry out an action (to not act) with the intention that it will cause death. So there is no real difference between passive and active killing, since both have the same result: the death of a person. ...read more.


One evening Jones sneaks into the bathroom where the child is having his bath. As he enters the bathroom he sees the boy fall over, hit his head on the side of the bath and slide face-down under the water. Jones is delighted; he doesn't rescue the child but stands by the bath, and watches as the child drowns. This doctrine is currently the position of the law. There is no obligation to save someone but you are classed a murderer if you actively kill someone. However, most people would say that this difference between their moral guilt is nil. In my opinion, although there might be a moral difference between these cases, there is not an ethical reason to distinguish the two. Therefore, you would only be justified in stopping both of these building works, or allowing them both to go ahead. 09/03/2011 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    Ethics in practise could justify killing someone, where basic morality and Aristotle naming actions that are bad in themselves could never allow that. To begin to conclude, it is obvious that the acquisition of ethics can be found in the reasoning of both Plato and Aristotle in the way that they treat the issue of justice.

  2. life after death

    a true Christian working in the name of god and went to heaven. This teaches Christians in order to go to heaven you must change yourself in your actions and in your heart and truly believing in god. "When he ascended to the heights, he led a crowd of captives

  1. Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions ...

    Nevertheless, words such as 'good' have descriptive and prescriptive value in order to set standards. For example 'stealing is wrong' is an opinion from an Emotivist's point of view, which incurs a descriptive meaning. Conversely, 'you ought not to steal' is a prescriptive point of view.

  2. "Medical research in the U.K. is being suffocated by excessive governance and ethical review".

    research ethics committees in health and social care.18 Group members examined aspects concerning remit, administration, operation, and workload of ethics committees in England. Their main tasks were to explore the presence of unnecessary regulations that hinder future research approvals. Other objectives of this group were to find solutions to any

  1. How Successful is The Co-operative Banks Ethical policy?

    Firstly, employees will feel more motivated as a result of two factors, both of which make he employees more motivated and therefore more productive: a. They will feel they are a part of a firm that is trying to make the world better.

  2. What in your opinion is the difference between doing the best thing and doing ...

    It seems therefore as if doing the right thing must involve a good intention, and a sense of duty. Another example, which is less obvious, is that if you are a person who loves meat, but does not eat it because you believe it is wrong to kill animals, you

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work