• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good thing, and can only persons be harmful?

Extracts from this document...


Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good thing, and can only persons be harmful? Knowledge, like the biblical forbidden fruit, is enticing. The curiosity of human beings urges them to seek new knowledge, and the intelligence of human beings has spurs them to apply their known knowledge for their benefits. People seek knowledge to make use of it and create new knowledge. Since some human beings fail to apply their knowledge in a universally beneficial way, people blame knowledge itself to be evil. However, if examined with care, all knowledge is in itself neutral, and only its misguided application can be harmful. To begin with, I question myself, "What is knowledge?" Defined as a conceptual higher-level abstraction of information, knowledge can be categorized in two distinct areas: theoretical knowledge and practical or applied knowledge. Theoretical knowledge includes all scientific facts that can be proven and experienced by the senses, while practical knowledge includes all applications based on the former. ...read more.


This explains why anything in itself without any practical use is neutral. For example, when people grant water the meaning of "a clear, colorless, odorless, and tasteless liquid, essential for most plant and animal life and the most widely used of all solvents", water is beneficial. Nevertheless, for the people who encounter floods which bring affliction and suffering and cause enormous economical loss, water is a disaster. Let us refer back to the earlier example. Besides the negative utilization, the knowledge of committing a crime can also be used in criminology for crime prevention. Thus there are always two sides, and may be more, to every single thing in the universe. However, both of these two sides are subject to human manipulation. For example, floods are catastrophic because human beings come to this conclusion from their experience, but in themselves, floods simply consist of water molecules and impurities. Therefore, water is materially neutral, and all the moods, sentiments and attitudes that human beings have towards water are all based on their experiences with it. ...read more.


not been discovered to have any practical use; however, mathematicians are so fascinated by it not only because of the intellectual challenge that it provides, but also due to its possible future applications. Human beings are so curious and optimistic that they cannot help but explore new knowledge and expect advantages from it because instinctively, they believe knowledge is a good thing. In conclusion, human beings are innocent to the extent that they cannot agree on what knowledge they should seek and cannot decide how they will utilize the knowledge; but they are responsible for all applications they decide to use after discovering the value of their new knowledge. Knowledge itself is neutral and innocuous, as it cannot take the responsibility for causing the dire consequences created by human beings who misuse it. More importantly, we can neither blame human beings for being curious, nor knowledge for being neutral. Mankind is the most unpredictable thing one can think of, but if every human being cooperates, knowledge can be as beneficent as it should be. http://www.akri.org/museum/what.htm [SBSB1] [SBSB2] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Describe the Christian cosmology and the Muslim cosmology.

    They feel that scientific theories only show peoples' growing understanding of what was revealed to the Prophet Muhammed by Allah. Christians have two main views. One of these is Conservatism. Conservatives all believe that scripture originated with God himself and take the pages of the Bible quite literally.

  2. Aristotle believed that everything has a cause. He saw four different explanations for ...

    Aristotle criticises Plato for failing to support his belief in the "Realm of Forms" with evidence. However Aristotle doesn't provide concrete evidence for believing that this material world is the source of true knowledge. Religious believers may argue that revelation from God is a source of true knowledge and understanding.

  1. Hide and Seek - poetry analysis

    Vernon Scannett uses several short, punchy sentences for impact and they make the poem sound panicked and very tense. It is now as though the person is desperately hiding from an enemy rather than just playing a game with peers.

  2. Compare the respective approaches of rationalism and empiricism towards a theory of knowledge ...

    "I have a body", "Black is not white" ii) Demonstrative We put simple ideas together to form complex ones, to demonstrate something, e.g. "heat of sun is like heat from a fire". iii) Sensitive This form of knowledge is the most uncertain, as it relies on the senses, e.g.

  1. Theory of knowledge - Subjectivity versus Objectivity

    In itself, this is a great limitation. Subjectivity by itself is not enough in the knowing process. Objectivity is required if we are to truly know. A "characteristic" of objectivity is the fact that it arises from subjectivity itself. Subjective thinking has been the basis for the knowing process for thousands of years and only in the modern age has objectivity arisen.

  2. What is Knowledge? Explain and Illustrate

    No experience is needed for this to be classed as 'knowledge' but these statements are true. This also applies to logic and deductive reasoning. Knowledge by Acquaintance Knowing something or someone is not the same as knowing facts about something or someone.

  1. "True" and "false" seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually ...

    An example is Aristotle- even though he was an eminent philosopher and the first recognized physician, he believed that the Earth is flat- just like anyone else at that time. Additionally, it is not always so easy to say whether somebody deserves to be an authority or not.

  2. Theory of Knowledge.

    This is a simple example on how we have been influenced without us noticing. If angels do exist and they happen to be an old lady with a broomstick then maybe we have burnt a couple of them in the past.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work