• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good thing, and can only persons be harmful?

Extracts from this document...


Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good thing, and can only persons be harmful? Knowledge, like the biblical forbidden fruit, is enticing. The curiosity of human beings urges them to seek new knowledge, and the intelligence of human beings has spurs them to apply their known knowledge for their benefits. People seek knowledge to make use of it and create new knowledge. Since some human beings fail to apply their knowledge in a universally beneficial way, people blame knowledge itself to be evil. However, if examined with care, all knowledge is in itself neutral, and only its misguided application can be harmful. To begin with, I question myself, "What is knowledge?" Defined as a conceptual higher-level abstraction of information, knowledge can be categorized in two distinct areas: theoretical knowledge and practical or applied knowledge. Theoretical knowledge includes all scientific facts that can be proven and experienced by the senses, while practical knowledge includes all applications based on the former. ...read more.


This explains why anything in itself without any practical use is neutral. For example, when people grant water the meaning of "a clear, colorless, odorless, and tasteless liquid, essential for most plant and animal life and the most widely used of all solvents", water is beneficial. Nevertheless, for the people who encounter floods which bring affliction and suffering and cause enormous economical loss, water is a disaster. Let us refer back to the earlier example. Besides the negative utilization, the knowledge of committing a crime can also be used in criminology for crime prevention. Thus there are always two sides, and may be more, to every single thing in the universe. However, both of these two sides are subject to human manipulation. For example, floods are catastrophic because human beings come to this conclusion from their experience, but in themselves, floods simply consist of water molecules and impurities. Therefore, water is materially neutral, and all the moods, sentiments and attitudes that human beings have towards water are all based on their experiences with it. ...read more.


not been discovered to have any practical use; however, mathematicians are so fascinated by it not only because of the intellectual challenge that it provides, but also due to its possible future applications. Human beings are so curious and optimistic that they cannot help but explore new knowledge and expect advantages from it because instinctively, they believe knowledge is a good thing. In conclusion, human beings are innocent to the extent that they cannot agree on what knowledge they should seek and cannot decide how they will utilize the knowledge; but they are responsible for all applications they decide to use after discovering the value of their new knowledge. Knowledge itself is neutral and innocuous, as it cannot take the responsibility for causing the dire consequences created by human beings who misuse it. More importantly, we can neither blame human beings for being curious, nor knowledge for being neutral. Mankind is the most unpredictable thing one can think of, but if every human being cooperates, knowledge can be as beneficent as it should be. http://www.akri.org/museum/what.htm [SBSB1] [SBSB2] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Hide and Seek - poetry analysis

    Vernon Scannett uses several short, punchy sentences for impact and they make the poem sound panicked and very tense. It is now as though the person is desperately hiding from an enemy rather than just playing a game with peers.

  2. Theory of knowledge - Subjectivity versus Objectivity

    Religion in the past is hardly different from religion today with subtle differences in people's faiths.

  1. Describe the Christian cosmology and the Muslim cosmology.

    and therefore argues that the theory of evolution is not true. Muslims accept many scientific theories of creation, as they do not believe they challenge the accounts of the Qur'an but help them to understand more about Allah and the way in which he works.

  2. Is a knower's personal point of view an asset or an obstacle to be ...

    This is another case where the reasoning process is undermined. Much of emotion is dictated by an individual's environment and society. If a personal had been raised as a Christian his whole life, it is most likely that he will conform to Christian values.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Humans had to decide for themselves from 'epistemic distance' or a distance in the dimension of knowledge. The argument being that if God was present then humans would be overwhelmed by his presence and expectations, thus would always obey God not due to their own violation but because He was overlooking their every move.

  2. Aristotle believed that everything has a cause. He saw four different explanations for ...

    Instead Aristotle argued that knowledge of the form of a thing came from experience. However there is no direct evidence for Aristotle's claims either. He argues that we can have true knowledge only through direct sense experience. Empiricists believe that the world is knowable through sense experience and rationalists believe that reason (without the support of external experience)

  1. "The Sinner is often the Saint." In what way does Greene explore this paradox ...

    In relation to this whole idea of pity being Scobie's source of corruption, it can be said that although corruption is based on an emotion, and a desire to relieve pain rather than to cause it, thus suggesting that he should be regarded as a 'saint'.

  2. Is Perception the Source and Basis of Knowledge?

    Empiricism bases its entire doctrin on the belief that we must refer to experience as a source of knowledge. We have come to know this type of knowledge as a posteriori: knowledge that comes after or is dependent upon experience.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work