• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is what promotes the greatest good for the greatest number necessarily morally right?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is what promotes the greatest good for the greatest number necessarily morally right? The question posed in the title above is one that utilitarianism tries to answer. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory, first developed by Jeremy Bentham, which is only interested in the ends (consequentialist) and not the manner in which those ends are achieved. The way utilitarianism determines between a right and wrong action, is by seeing which promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number, and this is known as the Principle of Utility. Bentham also believed that it was possible to calculate the amount of happiness using Hedons (Positive), and Dolors (Negative) as the units of measurement, and therefore the action that has the most Hedons is the right action. This was known as the Utilitarian Calculus. However to answer the title question we need to see whether Bentham's theory always results in an action that is necessarily morally right. ...read more.

Middle

This poses a moral problem, as most people would agree that it is not a morally correct thing to have inequality. Another problem of the utilitarian calculus is that not everything can be quantified, and therefore not everything can be calculated using Hedons and Dolors. Things such as love and emotion cannot be quantified, but these too can bring us pleasure and happiness, and there is that danger that we might ignore them because they cannot be easily measured. Many writers have criticized Bentham's work, and it was John Stuart Mill's aim to improve on Bentham's ideas. Mill introduced the distinction between higher and lower pleasures. He claimed that Bentham's utilitarianism made humans no better than pigs, if all we aimed to do was have sex, eat and sleep. Mill therefore said that it is not just the quantity that matters (e.g. five sweets may be better than one), but also the quality, which he described as pleasures that stimulate the mind. ...read more.

Conclusion

However a Rule Utilitarian would say that it is not right, because everyone, no matter what the circumstance, should follow the same rule. In this situation not breaking the speed limit would result in bringing less happiness compared to if you broke the speed limit, and therefore you cannot be considered a utilitarian. If on the other hand you are a Rule Utilitarian who believes that sometimes it is fine to break the rules on utilitarianism terms, then you are no longer a Rule Utilitarian and are effectively collapsing back into an Act Utilitarian. To conclude, something that promotes the greatest good for the greatest number can be morally right however it is not always the case. As shown above there are many problems with utilitarianism and it does not approach such ideas as fairness. Utilitarianism is results based (consequentialist) and does not care about the manner in which the results are achieved. This is a major problem when talking about morality and therefore my opinion is that, what promotes the greatest good for the greatest number is not necessarily morally right. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    one cannot state that the actual amount of pain is any less for me or any more for her. It is strictly in the individual and each situation can only be evaluated on a contextual basis. Pleasure and pain are solely subjective experiences; there is no accounting or disputing matters of taste.

  2. Utilitarianism is a contrast to classic approaches to ethics. One of the main features ...

    One of the problems with the Hedonic Calculus was that it judged the quantity of happiness i.e. the number of people but not the quality of the happiness therefore problems arise in assessing it's value. Different pleasures bring different amounts of happiness to different people but in Bentham�s theory all pleasures are equal.

  1. Euthanasia can never be justified

    Destroy not yourselves. Surely Allah is ever merciful to you. Surah 4:29 Prophet Mohammed warned Muslims that those who commit suicide will go to hell. He said that if one is suffering they should turn to Allah for help. O ye who believe seek help with patient perseverance and Prayer; surely Allah is with those who patiently persevere.

  2. Gap between reason and emotion

    In addition she also is "simply succumbed to universal feelings of isolation and despair" (A Tragedy in Santa Monica) because she "suffered the humiliation of a previous failed marriage" (A Tragedy in Santa Monica) As a result, emotion is just another step after reasoning to justify moral decision and with

  1. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    Otherwise the action is wrong. (Business Ethics 1999) To put this more simply, it is a moral principle that when a course of action produces greatest balance of benefits over harms for everybody that are affected. Then this action is morally right, otherwise, it is wrong.

  2. "The greatest happiness for the greatest number" Using ToK thinking and terms, how far ...

    However, the problem is: is it a temporary happiness or a permanent happiness? Since humans have unlimited wants, we are always unsatisfied. Playing a bit more Play Station today does not mean that I will play less tomorrow. But yet this would result in an opportunity cost, which is the

  1. What are the main features of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? Examine and consider ...

    Bentham devised The Principle of Utility, claiming that an action can be determined right or wrong by its 'utility', or usefulness. The usefulness of an action refers to the amount of pleasure or happiness is caused by it. In order to ensure that the right course of action is taken,

  2. Is a good action always that which promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest ...

    They also believe that the ultimate good is happiness and the ultimate evil is unhappiness. But is happiness something that is always being sought for its own sake? Surely happiness is a response to a given situation and not being sought for its own sake.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work