• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kant’s moral theory

Extracts from this document...


The main question which Kant's moral theory was designed to answer is: 'what is the nature of morality?' this question can also be put in different ways: 'what is a moral action as contrasted with a non-moral one?' or again, 'what is the difference between a person who acts morally and one who does not?' Kant believe that this question, or set of questions, could be answered that the key to it lay in distinguishing between acts done from 'inclination' and acts done from a 'sense of duty'. People often indulge in a certain course of action because they are forced to. For instance, if I am waylaid by a thief, I will be forced to turn my money over to him if I have any, or if I refuse, I am forced to suffer the consequences. In such a case, we would not ordinarily describe my actions as being 'voluntary actions', or 'actions done because I wanted to'. Nor would we say that I was 'doing my duty'. In this instance. Not a free agent; I am properly described as not acting either 'inclination' or 'from duty' but rather as 'being compelled to do it.' Hence, it is a requisite of any act being done from 'inclination' or 'duty' that it be the act of a free agent. ...read more.


Accordingly, the action was done neither from duty nor from direct inclination, but merely a selfish view. On the other hand, it is a duty to maintain one's life; and in addition, everyone has also a direct inclination to do so. But on this account the often-anxious care which most men take for it has no intrinsic worth, and their maxim no moral import. They preserve their life as duty requires, no doubt, but not because duty requires. On the other hand, if adversity and hopeless sorrow have completely taken away the relish for life; if the unfortunate one, strong in mind, indignant at his fate, rather than desponding or dejected wishes for death, and yet preserves his life without loving it - from inclination or fear but from duty - then his maxim has a moral worth. As can be seen from the above quotation, Kant differs sharply from the utilitarians in stressing that the essence of morality is to be found in the motive from which an act is done. All such motives reduced to one - keeps promises by accident, or who repays debts to avoid punishment or who feels that it is to his/ her who feels that it is to his/her advantage in the long run to do so, is not moral. ...read more.


should hold good as a universal law, for myself as well as for others? And should I be able to say to myself, 'everyone may make a deceitful promise when he finds himself in a difficulty from which he cannot otherwise extricate himself?' then I presently become aware that while I can will the lie, I can by no means will that lying should be my future actions to those who would not believe this allegation, or if they over-hastily did so, would pay me back in my own coin. Hence my maxim, as soon as it should be made a universal law, would necessarily destroy itself. I do not, therefore, need any far-reaching penetration to discern what I have to do in order that my will may be morally good. Inexperienced in the course of the world, incapable of being prepared for all its contingencies, I only ask myself: canst thou also will that thy maxim should be a universal law? If not, then it must be rejected and that not because of a disadvantage accruing from it to myself or even to others, but because it cannot enter as a principle into a possible universal legislation, and reason extorts from me immediate respect for such legislation. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain how a Hindu marriage service might guide a couple in their married life?

    The sacred texts consider abortion a crime because it is against the principle of ahimsa (non-violence), as it does not respect the life of the foetus, and prevents the rebirth of the atman (soul) in the foetus. But many modern Hindus also believe that it is better for a child

  2. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    It provides endless happiness as an incentive to do the right thing. It allows for flexibility in being partial. We can generally recognize "bad" character when we see it. Virtue theory is easy to adapt to because it's an extremely universal ethical theory, which does not require the belief in a higher being such as god.

  1. A classmate has cheated. You have seen him/her. Discuss the several elements from a ...

    For instance, hard working, well prepared for the tasks, obey the regulations and take action in a fair way, etc. Moreover, virtue theory also states the importance of avoiding the bad habit. The student should avoid being lazy and prepare properly for the exam.

  2. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    Singer has twisted his thought experiments so that they only deal with the here and now; it seems absurd to ask why the child is in the pond in the first place, which is what we should do. Singer declares that constant poverty, a cyclone and civil war were the reasons why the people of Bengal were suffering so much.

  1. Kantians believe promises should always be kept even if breaking brings about benefits because ...

    That is respect if Kantian believes the promise he or she has made is disrespectful to others he or she will break that promise. For example, let say Kantian has made a promise to collect money for his church and has to do this by going from house to house asking for donations.

  2. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    The utilitarian principle requires that we first evaluate both the good and bad consequences of an action; then we determine whether the total good consequences is greater the total bad consequences. If the good consequences are greater, then the action is morally right.

  1. The philosophy of morality.

    Justification is what deals with determining right action and appropriate beliefs. We can not have knowledge of a belief with out justification, but at the same time, we can be justified in believing something which is false, for example if someone were sitting in a room with no windows and

  2. Do Some of Us Take the Moral High Ground?

    as a species maintain our sustainability for future generations.Our actions today will have an impact on their values attitudes and beliefs. Bauman cites Beck ,Bauman 1992,who states that in our quest for industrialization,be it in the form of progress or modernisation ;we have over stepped the mark and we are now living in what he calls arisk society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work