• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kant’s moral theory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The main question which Kant's moral theory was designed to answer is: 'what is the nature of morality?' this question can also be put in different ways: 'what is a moral action as contrasted with a non-moral one?' or again, 'what is the difference between a person who acts morally and one who does not?' Kant believe that this question, or set of questions, could be answered that the key to it lay in distinguishing between acts done from 'inclination' and acts done from a 'sense of duty'. People often indulge in a certain course of action because they are forced to. For instance, if I am waylaid by a thief, I will be forced to turn my money over to him if I have any, or if I refuse, I am forced to suffer the consequences. In such a case, we would not ordinarily describe my actions as being 'voluntary actions', or 'actions done because I wanted to'. Nor would we say that I was 'doing my duty'. In this instance. Not a free agent; I am properly described as not acting either 'inclination' or 'from duty' but rather as 'being compelled to do it.' Hence, it is a requisite of any act being done from 'inclination' or 'duty' that it be the act of a free agent. ...read more.

Middle

Accordingly, the action was done neither from duty nor from direct inclination, but merely a selfish view. On the other hand, it is a duty to maintain one's life; and in addition, everyone has also a direct inclination to do so. But on this account the often-anxious care which most men take for it has no intrinsic worth, and their maxim no moral import. They preserve their life as duty requires, no doubt, but not because duty requires. On the other hand, if adversity and hopeless sorrow have completely taken away the relish for life; if the unfortunate one, strong in mind, indignant at his fate, rather than desponding or dejected wishes for death, and yet preserves his life without loving it - from inclination or fear but from duty - then his maxim has a moral worth. As can be seen from the above quotation, Kant differs sharply from the utilitarians in stressing that the essence of morality is to be found in the motive from which an act is done. All such motives reduced to one - keeps promises by accident, or who repays debts to avoid punishment or who feels that it is to his/ her who feels that it is to his/her advantage in the long run to do so, is not moral. ...read more.

Conclusion

should hold good as a universal law, for myself as well as for others? And should I be able to say to myself, 'everyone may make a deceitful promise when he finds himself in a difficulty from which he cannot otherwise extricate himself?' then I presently become aware that while I can will the lie, I can by no means will that lying should be my future actions to those who would not believe this allegation, or if they over-hastily did so, would pay me back in my own coin. Hence my maxim, as soon as it should be made a universal law, would necessarily destroy itself. I do not, therefore, need any far-reaching penetration to discern what I have to do in order that my will may be morally good. Inexperienced in the course of the world, incapable of being prepared for all its contingencies, I only ask myself: canst thou also will that thy maxim should be a universal law? If not, then it must be rejected and that not because of a disadvantage accruing from it to myself or even to others, but because it cannot enter as a principle into a possible universal legislation, and reason extorts from me immediate respect for such legislation. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain how a Hindu marriage service might guide a couple in their married life?

    The sacred texts consider abortion a crime because it is against the principle of ahimsa (non-violence), as it does not respect the life of the foetus, and prevents the rebirth of the atman (soul) in the foetus. But many modern Hindus also believe that it is better for a child

  2. Kantians believe promises should always be kept even if breaking brings about benefits because ...

    The idea of disrespect goes against his beliefs. I believe Kantian will choose not to kept her promise because of that one word, respect. Respect and treating others with respect is as important to Kantian the keeping promises. Kantian will see that her friend and her friends son are not respecting her.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    a view on whether the sanctity of life should be regarded as a moral absolute. But what do Ethical theories say on the sanctity of life? To any Teleological theory, there are no absolutes, so what does this say about the sanctity of life?

  2. The Canterbury Tales: A Moral Reading.

    The person that understands this knows that love will find them and if they truly do love someone, they will become theirs. In the Reeves tale, a miller cheats two men out of what they paid for. To get back at him, they sleep with his wife and daughter.

  1. A classmate has cheated. You have seen him/her. Discuss the several elements from a ...

    Basing on these three main theories, argumentation will be given in the coming chapters. Thesis Firstly, the "Virtue Theory" will be taken into consideration for the case. Virtue theory points out that it is important for human to develop good habits of character instead of giving straight rules on what to do and what not to do.

  2. How would you answer the question, "Why be Moral?"

    Naturally we all want what is good to us and for others, therefore we limit ourselves to doing bad deeds. Our initial response is, if we want good to be done to us, we will do good for others. If we do not want any bad to happen to us, we will not do anything bad to others.

  1. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    However, if thought through, Singer's ideal still encounters problems; one only has to think about the consequences of his ideal to see how meaningless it would become. If Singer's argument was consistently applied, and we gave away everything apart from that which we needed for 'basic necessities' no one would

  2. Do Some of Us Take the Moral High Ground?

    only a few seconds, is classed in law, as murder.So, who is playing God;what are their qualifications;and where are the boundaries.For the purpose of this essay the author aims to focus on the role that technology has played in the field of genetics and reproduction.As it is through reproduction we

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work