• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kantians believe promises should always be kept even if breaking brings about benefits because if everyone starts breaking promises what is the point of making one.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Dr. Kirk McDermind Philosophy 100 10 March 2008 Essay 2- Kantians think promises must always be kept, in every circumstance A Kantian is another form of deontologists who believes that everyone should do what is morally right according to their beliefs without fear of consequences, yet they should never use people as "means to your end but as ends in themselves" (Martin 130). They are driven by the duty to show others respect. Kantian believes in respect and that we can use people to get what we want, as long as we respect them (by helping them get what they want/need) while we use them. As long as there is mutual respect toward each other while seeking one's own benefit, then it is ok. The situation with Kantian and her promise to coach her friends son to become a doctor even though he will kill patients is a hard one for a character like Kantian. Kantian could go two ways. Either keep the promise and coach her friends son or not coach and save future patients lives. ...read more.

Middle

Kantian's categorical imperative is telling her she has to keep her promise without questioning it. It will be morally good to keep a promise but bad to release a negligent doctor in society. Although it may benefit society Kantian could not careless because he will never break a promise even if society stands to benefit. "The reason you couldn't will that everyone should break promises when that would bring benefits is that if everyone did that, then the whole concept of promising would become meaningless"(133). Although society will stand to benefit from Kantians broken promise, she can not break her promise. Since Kantian has no "consideration of consequences" and believe they "are totally irreverent to moral thinking" (133). Breaking a promise is out of the question for Kantian even if she is teaching a boy who might accidentally murder people. Kantian is a complex character, even though he/she says that they will never break a promise, they have a loop hole in their belief that can make them. ...read more.

Conclusion

This will go against my belied and morals and I am not Kantian without my beliefs and morals." In the end Kantian has two ways to solve his problem and both ways will in a way go against his morals and go against his beliefs. One way Kantian could go is keep the promise and another way Kantian could go is respect himself, the future patients of the killer surgeon, his job, and break the promise. The smart choice will be to break the promise because the promise show that her friend and her friends son is using Kantian in a disrespectful way. If they respected Kantian they would know and understand his morals and they will see that the promise is disrespecting Kantian and everyone who is going to suffer from the situation if Kantian keeps the promise. So the whole promise was made by going against Kantians beliefs on respect and when Kantian sees this he will break the promise. Kantian would say " I, Kantian make promises based on Respect and if the promise I made is disrespectful in anyway to anyone then that cannot be a promise that Kantian made and definitely not a promise Kantian will keep". ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    My analysis of Christian Aid's work is that it is a very generous, good, and coherent campaign, my reasons for which are as follows. It is a very worthwhile scheme, because certain countries are benefiting from these schemes and

  2. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    Utilitarianism maintains that it is about numbers, because five peoples suffering being alleviated for the cost of one is justified. For the healthy individual, this type of personal detachment from one's own life is impossible (Harwood 181). This argument is sufficient to discredit utilitarianism, but there are a number of

  1. life after death

    This quote proves that heaven and hell exsists, but this is based on belief. I can understand why someone would agree with this statement, if a person is atheist or believes that there isn't a heaven or hell then the belief is no one has to worry about what happens next.

  2. Different religious and philosophical views on controversial topics.

    Again however they would say that we are obliged to give around 10% of our total income to charity and as such only giving on comic relief shows our disregard for Christ's teachings. Thus comic relief is proof of our sin.

  1. "Miller's plays show is that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises" ...

    and although he realises that some of them will lead to unhappiness, he still maintains the concept in the play of concealing things - "I suspected my father and I did nothing about it". This shows that Chris would rather keep the idea that Joe could have killed 21 pilots,

  2. How might a moral relativist respond to the claim that people should always tell ...

    Ethical non-cognitivism rejects both these positions. Naturalism is denied because, as Moore demonstrated, it commits the naturalistic fallacy; and Moore's own teaching is rejected because there exists no simple quality called 'good' disclosed by intuition; because indeed ethical propositions are non-cognitive, communicating no knowledge whatsoever and containing nothing therefore that can be rendered true or false.

  1. What do I mean when I say, 'I know', and why should anyone believe ...

    You might be thinking: 'why would the textbook be wrong if we are supposed to learn what a heart is like, surely the school wants us to learn what things really look like?' but there is still -however slim- chance that the school is trying to teach you lies.

  2. To what extent, if at all, should conscience be ignored when making moral decisions?

    This means that my initial moral reacition to a situation may not be the same as our first moral decision, which is the product of our power of reason, both are equally as important in moral decision-making. Bishop Butler asserts "conscience automatically exerts its power over us it is God given."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work