• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Knowledge Of Angels' Essay.

Extracts from this document...


'Knowledge Of Angels' Essay Question "Wait," said Beneditx. "You speak like a man who, seeing that a twig springs from a branch and that many twigs spring from a branch and that many twigs spring from many branches, denies the existence of a trunk to the tree. Follow the multiplicity back and back, and you will find the single trunk." In this extract, Beneditx and Palinor argue about the existence of God. Show how the key idea about the proof of God's existence is presented in the dialogues between Beneditx and Palinor. One of the focal points in Paton Walsh's novel 'Knowledge Of Angles' is the question of whether or not God exists. She presents this argument to the reader in a number of ways, but the bulk of the argument is put across through the dialogues between Beneditx and Palinor. Severo assigned Beneditx to show Palinor that God exists by defeating Palinor's beliefs through argument. Palinor is reluctant to accept this proposal without a fight, and he battles with Beneditx throughout the book, constantly destroying whatever proof Beneditx cares to present him with. 'How could you assert that this being you imagine does not exist? ...read more.


It was very popular with some people, but others refused to accept it as a relevant way of answering a question. For example, 'it is sunny in the summer. It is sunny today, therefore it must be summertime.' This argument is not contradictory, but it cannot be branded as being pertinent unless we know for sure that it is summertime, which would be drawn from experience, providing an A Posteriori proof. The reason A Priori proofs were so popular when it came to arguing for the existence of God was because it was very hard to overcome. To say that God is perfect, is to say that he is perfect at everything, which means that he must exist. To say that God does not exist is to say that he is not perfect; therefore he is not God. The irony of these two arguments is that they essentially prove the same thing. The first argument states that God exists because to be perfect one must exist. The latter of the two is showing that in order for God not to exist, he must be flawed, so if he does not exist he cannot possibly be God. ...read more.


Beneditx replies by saying that God has revealed himself to humans, to which Palinor says that God has not revealed himself to humans, but humans have revealed God to themselves. He uses a practical demonstration to prove his point that to know something and to trust a person who says that they know something are two very different things. The very essence of this message is that A Priori proofs rely on trusting information derived from other sources; whereas A Posteriori proofs are founded upon knowledge drawn from ones own experience. Paton Walsh fundamentally shows the key idea about the proof of God's existence through A Priori and A Posteriori proofs put across to the reader in the dialogues between Beneditx and Palinor. The message that she puts across to the reader is that there is no way of knowing A Posteriori that God exists, but we can only assume A Priori that he must exist simply because in order to be God he must exist, an argument which in itself goes round in an endless circle. The arguments between Beneditx and Palinor do not reveal to us whether or not God truly exists, but simply that having knowledge and trusting knowledge are not the same thing, and that humans must make their own decision as to whether or not God exists. - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Revelation Essay

    God no longer needed to reveal Himself as a being, but instead his intentions for His people. God sent His only son to communicate to us that there is a way to be followed, to follow the path of Christ.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Things are caused by an external influence in a succession of events, however these events cannot go back to the beginning of time, there must have been a first cause and this was God. The third way identified the contingency of matter in the universe.

  1. Belief has been described as TOK essay

    In real-life situation, engineers would never take this value exactly, instead they will double or triple the value. This is simply because they can hardly proof the calculations to work in nature. Here, the concept of the notion is applicable where engineers just try to be certain about things they never could have seen.

  2. Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good ...

    The famous Goldbach Conjecture, which is said to be the most splendid pearl on the golden crown of mathematics, has

  1. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    What is being asked here is: Is it greater to exist in the mind alone or in the mind and in reality (or outside of the mind)? Anselm asks you to consider the painter, e.g. define which is greater: the reality of a painting as it exists in the mind

  2. How are the sources of knowledge used in 'Blood Wedding', 'Love in the Time ...

    "I sought out knowledgeable priests...to visit God and the Devil" (Line 11) He waited for the priests while they worshipped their God and did their rituals, which shows that he carefully observed every move they made with the hope that it might help him.

  1. Preliminary Interpretation of Descartes Meditations

    "it must be admitted that at least some other things are real, that they are even more simple and general and that it is from them, as if from true colours, that all those images of things in our thoughts, both true and false, are constructed" He continues by saying

  2. Theory of Knowledge.

    Some of the common things found with these religions and spiritual beliefs are a legitimately higher power, a happy ending for believer, a bad ending for those who goes against it. If we use our logic for justification combined with empirical evidence it is clear that these beliefs are shortcuts in getting people to do the right thing!

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work