• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

Extracts from this document...


Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language [This is an old set of notes used to attempt to simply explain the challenge to religious language posed by Logical Positivism] Introduction Religious language appears to be used by most religious believers without any sense of there being a problem with what they are saying. For them the term 'God' itself is freely applied and used. No difficulties are detected in the application of that 'name'. However, theologians and philosophers recognise that 'God-talk' is a much more complex matter than often appears. Moreover, one branch of philosophy has argued that 'God-talk' is meaningless. The following statements highlight the complexity: * God loves us like a father * God is my rock * God wrestled with Jacob * God was crucified. Does religious language have the same meaning as 'ordinary language'? And what gives 'ordinary language' its sense anyway? Can a non-believer understand the language of a believer? What are the main issues involved? * How does one decide what, if any, language about God is appropriate? * How do we decide what language used of God is to be understood as literal, symbolic or metaphorical?[1] * How should language about God be understood if God is not a phenomenal being? God is often held to be timeless, spaceless and bodiless - such a God will not be able to love, wrestle, or act like human persons. How, if God is completely different from anything that comes within the range of our experience, can we speak of God in ways that we speak of other things in our world? ...read more.


In other words, Flew challenges the believer to specify what would count as a falsification of her religious claims; and he argues that if nothing could then the claims are vacuous. On the one hand, Flew's suggestions could possibly free the LP challenge from its narrow conception of experience as sense experience that can potentially be verifiable, to include more general types of experience and language that can be falsifiable. For e.g., whereas the 'strong' VP has problems with statements of love (since they cannot strictly be verified), the FP can include them by asking negatively what type of conditions would falsify the statement that 'Romeo and Juliet were greatly in love'. --- However, critics have recognised that what Flew really wants is some set of empirically observable conditions which would falsify theological assertions.[3] --- In Flew's parable, is it really unreasonable to argue for the existence of a gardener who tends that plot when it is perfectly possible to notice how extremely odd that piece of land is when compared to its surroundings? --- The sceptic and the believer do not disagree, in Flew's parable, on what counts as evidence, but only on what counts as a proper/legitimate interpretation of that evidence. Does that mean that there is not a possible 'true' or 'false', as non-cognitivists advance? And does it mean that either interpretation given is any less rational than the other? Finally, the fact that one reassesses and modifies one's original proposal/hypothesis is surely a reasonable thing to do - unless, of course, there is overwhelming evidence that the general hypothesis is not true. Then, but only then, is it irrational to continue to modify it. ...read more.


While, in some sense the resurrection of Jesus from the dead is not an historical event (it is an eschatological event) a certain understanding of it and its significance would be drastically altered if the, in principle verifiable, empty tomb incident turned out to be a hoax of some kind. Conclusion Logical Positivism was an attempt to take seriously the progresses made in scientific knowledge for the philosophical project. In so doing it intended to purge philosophical thinking and speaking of all that was unworthy of decent philosophical conversation. However, in so summarily and easily dismissing theological statements as meaningless the LPs failed to account for the great variety of the types of religious utterances, which include many other sorts of things than mere statements/factual propositions. As such, when applying itself to the issue of religious language (and also arguably to the whole epistemological and methodological endeavour) Logical Positivism is too simplistic and na�ve. Perhaps, then, to say that statements are not 'factually meaningful' is no more than to say that they do not have meaning in the way that scientific statements have meaning. Viewed in this sort of way, the work of the LPs may be understood as the beginnings of a large task of mapping different sorts of linguistic meaning, and different ways of getting that meaning. The LPs themselves did not see it that way, but in particular the later work of Wittgenstein indicated that Logical Positivism was inadequate and that there was a further programme of work to be done in mapping linguistic meaning. Bultmann believed myths had to be reinterpreted, and he did that existentially. He saw the resurrection not as a history fact, but as a miracle of faith in the lives of the disciples ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Religious believers have faith in God even when God seems to be allowing things ...

    Statements about religious belief are actually descriptions of the grammar of the religious game. This implies that something cannot be both a rule of grammar and at the same time a description of reality. This approach leaves the religious language game forever defining its own rules.

  2. a1 a2 a3 and part b religious coursework

    There are also many other references in the Qur'an that God created everything in six days. There is no clear creationist order in the traditional view of Islamic cosmology, but it states that God created the sun, moon, stars and planets.

  1. Science Is The Language Of God

    But, what if God did not want his words to be understood only by those select few? God would obviously want the whole world to know his words, his thoughts, his desires. Sure, everyone can read the Bhagvad Gita or the Bible or the Koran, but how many will understand what they are reading?

  2. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    One of the evidentialist's arguments is that you should never believe anything on insufficient evidence. What I have to ask is what would be sufficient evidence? William James said 'sometimes you should believe even when there is insufficient evidence. If Christianity is going to make a real difference to someone's life then they cannot wait for the evidence.'

  1. Corporate religious experiences such as the Toronto blessing tell us nothing about god. Discuss

    As I have examined the different types of religious experience, individual and corporate, finding out weather they show any signs of an argument of proof of God. I have been looking in to the nature of revelation and how this might been seen as an attempt to answer the question of how so many believers might feel they know God.

  2. corporate religious experience such as the toronto blessing tell us nothing about god

    Before we can answer the question of whether corporate religious experience such as Toronto can tell us anything about God, we must first examine the evidence and reach a conclusion as to whether these experiences are genuine as opposed to some kind "universal obsessional neurosis" - (a psychological illness as suggested by Freud)

  1. I am going to be looking at how the religion of Hinduism relates to ...

    As a Hindu, I personally believe that it is my duty, to keep the environment clean, as God has given us this beautiful universe and by keeping it clean, we as humans are, showing a sign of gratefulness towards God.

  2. In which ways has science challenged religious beliefs? There are hundreds of disputes since ...

    According to the bible and the story of creation in Genesis God is pictured as a hands on power for the construction the planet and is directly involved in Creation. Ptolemy who was an astronomer influenced the Christian view of the planets.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work