• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Miller's plays show is that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises" To what extent does this claim apply to All My Sons?

Extracts from this document...


A critic has written that "Miller's plays show is that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises" To what extent does this claim apply to All My Sons? The critique about Miller's plays applies directly to the central theme, and protagonist of All My Sons. It could be argued, that Joe Keller's moral compromise, in that he allowed a batch of faulty cylinder heads to be shipped out and used in planes, resulted in the death of 21 pilots, was done to achieve happiness. For example, Joe claims he had to ship out the cylinder heads in order to keep the business running for Chris' future. "You're a boy, what could I do! ...a hundred and twenty cracked...you're out of business". This therefore shows that Joe felt happiness could only be achieved by earning money, although the money would come from making a moral compromise. In the same way, Joe uses the excuse of money which supposedly creates happiness, to justify what he did - "you wanted money so I made money...what must I be forgiven?" This quote is very telling of the fact that Joe Keller - the main character of Miller's All My Sons - believes that money is the root of happiness, and that he did nothing wrong in shipping out cracked cylinder heads i.e. making a moral compromise, because it would lead to the Keller family having money. ...read more.


The critic's view that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises in Miller's plays is again shown when looking at the main plot from a different angle. For example, the fact that moral compromises are made not only by Joe shipping out faulty cylinder heads - "you (Joe) thought they'd crash" - but by the fact that Kate is aware of what Joe did, yet both her and Joe conceal the truth from everyone - including their son. Kate conceals the truth in that she lies for Joe because if she admitted to everyone the truth that Joe in fact shipped out the faulty cylinder heads she would be admitting that Larry was dead. "Your brother's alive...because if he's dead your father killed him". Therefore, in terms of Kate, making moral compromises is the only way to achieve happiness, because if she admits to people that Joe shipped out faulty cylinder heads, she would be admitting that Joe killed her son - "God does not let a son be killed by his father". All the characters in the play at some point make moral compromises; the difference between them is whether the result is happiness. Chris appears to be the most moral character throughout the story, in that he does want to make moral compromises from the very beginning. "We've made a terrible mistake with mother...being dishonest with her. That kind of thing always pays off". ...read more.


Miller uses irony in his way of showing that certain characters believe that happiness can only be achieved by moral compromises. When Joe is explaining to Chris and Ann about how it was 'Steve's fault' that the faulty cylinders were shipped out, Ann says "He [Joe] just wants everybody happy". This therefore demonstrates the idea that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises. By Joe lying about the fact that Steve was the one who is guilty - "if I could have gone in that day I'd-a told him - junk 'em...but he was afraid", he is supposedly creating happiness. Therefore, making moral compromises is the only way to achieve happiness where Joe is concerned, as telling the truth would lead to great unhappiness for Joe. It could also be said that this irony foreshadows the idea that Joe may be trying to make people happy, however in the end, he will be the one that disrupts all happiness within the family. The Mail on Sunday commented that Miller was "a towering figure who represents the writer as a true moral force". However when considering All My Sons, the majority of the play, and in fact, all the characters, take part in deceit, lies, and secrets - that is to say they make moral compromises. Overall, these moral compromises lead to happiness in the short term, however long term, these secrets, lies, and moral compromises will be revealed and cause the downfall of the characters and disintegration of relationships which previously created happiness. Michelle Bailey ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

    operated on immediately in order to save her life and her babies life and the other is an elderly women who has just had a stroke and will die unless she is seen to immediately.

  2. How Does Virtue Ethics apply to Business Ethics?

    The counter argument is that we learn from our experiences over time to find out for ourselves what is right and wrong. However, is this acceptable to allow for this self growth? It may take years for someone to find the right path, they may never find it or they may think they have found it but it is incorrect.

  1. The Dual, Blurred Symbolism of The Scarlet Letter

    She is able to bear the burden of the letter because it is in the open; there is nothing she can do to hide it from the world. It is in this way that she can begin to transform herself and the ignominious A into something greater.

  2. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    The principal of utility is simple and easily understood making this school of thought accessible to anyone. It appeals to the human sense of logic that happiness equals good and pain equals bad. On this premise the distinction between good and bad is easily seen and therefore also easily abided too.

  1. Kantians believe promises should always be kept even if breaking brings about benefits because ...

    Kantian at first would say I made a promise and I have to keep it. It is my duty as a person who has morals to keep their promise. I have agreed to prepare the boy for medical school. Kantian would also say the " I have a duty toward

  2. life after death

    "Explain how a particular belief in an afterlife may affect the way in which followers of this religion may live their lives" If Christians believe that there is a heaven and hell then they will live there lives in the straight way always worshiping god.

  1. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    It is argued whether or not it is a useful method for the basis of decision making. Therefore in order to create a coherent conclusion it is necessary that I analyze the strengths and weaknesses of virtue theory. Virtue theory focuses on the importance of the person, and the development

  2. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    been given the right to do what we please with it, in this instance, is God's power limited to just giving life? Because if we have been given life to do as we please with it, then with that, all god's power and control, which is what is implied in the sanctity of life, is taken away.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work